Message ID | 1336430840-27232-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 0964f6a27b3574d9210c59ec883cbb3fff78a78d |
Headers | show |
Am 08.05.2012 09:32, schrieb Artem Bityutskiy: > Since you are submitting often, you may save me a bit of editing if you > prefix UBI patches with just "UBI:" :-) But I do not mind amending > patches if you don't. > Will do. :) Thanks, //richard
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 00:47 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > !!(x < y) and (x < y) are identical expressions. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Thanks, pushed to l2-mtd.git. Since you are submitting often, you may save me a bit of editing if you prefix UBI patches with just "UBI:" :-) But I do not mind amending patches if you don't. Thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.c index 12c43b4..8d24435 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.c @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static int compare_lebs(struct ubi_device *ubi, const struct ubi_scan_leb *seb, } /* Obviously the LEB with lower sequence counter is older */ - second_is_newer = !!(sqnum2 > seb->sqnum); + second_is_newer = (sqnum2 > seb->sqnum); /* * Now we know which copy is newer. If the copy flag of the PEB with
!!(x < y) and (x < y) are identical expressions. Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> --- drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)