| Message ID | 20120504170533.GO4141@pengutronix.de |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 07:05:33PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Currently we are still missing the clk patches for next in -next. It > should be fine to have these in arm-soc since probably no non-arm > architecture will convert to the clock framework in the next two weeks. Actually I've a patch which I keep pushing to the x86 maintainers to enable the clock API there (ideally we'd enable it on all architectures that don't currently have one of their own straight off). > So Mike, please consider sending the following pull request to Arnd: Seconded! I'd also like to get the wm831x driver in there, I've not been looking at it since it doesn't seem sensible to put the effort in until we've got stuff flowing into -next.
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 07:05:33PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Erm, no, this is not a pull request, more a request for a pull request. > > Currently we are still missing the clk patches for next in -next. It > should be fine to have these in arm-soc since probably no non-arm > architecture will convert to the clock framework in the next two weeks. > > Then finally we could merge SoC clk code in the arm-soc tree. BTW there > are lready spear clk patches in the arm-soc tree which conflict with > Mikes branch so Viresh might have to fix them (maybe he sent the fixes > already to the list, can't remember) > > > So Mike, please consider sending the following pull request to Arnd: > And please do not forget to pick up the patch below, Mike. Sascha Hauer (1): clk: add a fixed factor clock Since Russell has published his clkdev branch, with above patch picked up on clk-next, I have everything ready to send my platform porting. Thanks, Shawn
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 02:10:18PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > And please do not forget to pick up the patch below, Mike. > > Sascha Hauer (1): > clk: add a fixed factor clock > > Since Russell has published his clkdev branch, with above patch picked > up on clk-next, I have everything ready to send my platform porting. > Mike, I haven't seen the following fixup being picked up. Can you please do? http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.msm/2614/focus=2637
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 02:10:18PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: >> And please do not forget to pick up the patch below, Mike. >> >> Sascha Hauer (1): >> clk: add a fixed factor clock >> >> Since Russell has published his clkdev branch, with above patch picked >> up on clk-next, I have everything ready to send my platform porting. >> > Mike, I haven't seen the following fixup being picked up. Can you > please do? > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.msm/2614/focus=2637 Will do. Regards, Mike
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 07:05:33PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > I'd also like to get the wm831x driver in there, I've not been looking > at it since it doesn't seem sensible to put the effort in until we've > got stuff flowing into -next. One thing to think about is the fact that CONFIG_COMMON_CLK pulls in clkdev. x86 doesn't have an arch/x86/include/asm/clkdev.h last time I looked. Regards, Mike
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 07:20:18PM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Mark Brown > > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 07:05:33PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > I'd also like to get the wm831x driver in there, I've not been looking > > at it since it doesn't seem sensible to put the effort in until we've > > got stuff flowing into -next. > One thing to think about is the fact that CONFIG_COMMON_CLK pulls in > clkdev. x86 doesn't have an arch/x86/include/asm/clkdev.h last time I > looked. Everything seemed to manage to build happily enough when I was testing, this is how I was build testing, though I'm not immediately sure why looking again. This does seem like we're stuck in the same failure that we're in with gpiolib, and obviously the -next issues get in the way too :(
Erm, no, this is not a pull request, more a request for a pull request. Currently we are still missing the clk patches for next in -next. It should be fine to have these in arm-soc since probably no non-arm architecture will convert to the clock framework in the next two weeks. Then finally we could merge SoC clk code in the arm-soc tree. BTW there are lready spear clk patches in the arm-soc tree which conflict with Mikes branch so Viresh might have to fix them (maybe he sent the fixes already to the list, can't remember) So Mike, please consider sending the following pull request to Arnd: The following changes since commit 66f75a5d028beaf67c931435fdc3e7823125730c: Linux 3.4-rc4 (2012-04-21 14:47:52 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.linaro.org/people/mturquette/linux.git clk-next for you to fetch changes up to 0e1c03017549a9df513622b3f15ff38eb8d35a62: clk: clk_set_rate() must fail if CLK_SET_RATE_GATE is set and clk is enabled (2012-05-01 18:13:38 -0700) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mark Brown (2): clk: Remove comment for end of CONFIG_COMMON_CLK section clk: Constify parent name arrays Mike Turquette (6): clk: core: correct clk_set_rate kerneldoc clk: core: remove dead code paths clk: core: clk_calc_new_rates handles NULL parents clk: core: enforce clk_ops consistency clk: core: copy parent_names & return error codes clk: basic: improve parent_names & return errors Rajendra Nayak (2): clk: Make clk_get_rate() return 0 on error clk: constify parent name arrays in macros Rob Herring (2): clk: select CLKDEV_LOOKUP for COMMON_CLK clk: remove trailing whitespace from clk.h Saravana Kannan (1): clk: Use a separate struct for holding init data. Shawn Guo (7): clk: use kzalloc in clk_register_mux clk: remove unnecessary EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL clk: add "const" for clk_ops of basic clks clk: declare clk_ops of basic clks in clk-provider.h clk: always pass parent_rate into .round_rate clk: pass parent_rate into .set_rate clk: propagate round_rate for CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT case Viresh Kumar (5): clk: Fix typo in comment clk: clk-gate: Create clk_gate_endisable() clk: clk-private: Add DEFINE_CLK macro clk: Don't set clk->new_rate twice clk: clk_set_rate() must fail if CLK_SET_RATE_GATE is set and clk is enabled drivers/clk/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/clk/clk-divider.c | 68 +++++------ drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c | 49 ++++---- drivers/clk/clk-gate.c | 104 ++++++++--------- drivers/clk/clk-mux.c | 26 +++-- drivers/clk/clk.c | 265 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- include/linux/clk-private.h | 79 +++++-------- include/linux/clk-provider.h | 95 ++++++++------- include/linux/clk.h | 6 +- 9 files changed, 383 insertions(+), 310 deletions(-)