mbox

Please pull 'next' branch of 4xx tree

Message ID CA+5PVA4n_G9mtUcExUuJoMWGuWWDh1h1hCPWe-DEy38G5qg40Q@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Delegated to: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jwboyer/powerpc-4xx.git next

Message

Josh Boyer March 16, 2012, 1:41 p.m. UTC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Ben,

A small pull request for linux-next.  This adds some commits for Bluestone
from APM, and updates the location of my tree in MAINTAINERS back to
kernel.org.

Stephen, could you change linux-next to pull from this tree instead of the
infradead one?

josh

The following changes since commit 01e8ec4417d3c484986af0adaa0ae6632e0a59cd:

  powerpc: Fix power4/970 idle code regression with lockdep
(2012-03-16 09:28:17 +1100)

are available in the git repository at:
  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jwboyer/powerpc-4xx.git next

Josh Boyer (1):
      MAINTAINERS: Update PowerPC 4xx tree

Vinh Nguyen Huu Tuong (3):
      powerpc/44x: The bug fixed support for APM821xx SoC and Bluestone board
      powerpc/44x: Add support PCI-E for APM821xx SoC and Bluestone board
      powerpc/44x: Add additional device support for APM821xx SoC and
Bluestone board

 MAINTAINERS                                |    2 +-
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bluestone.dts        |  127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c             |    2 +-
 arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Kconfig         |    1 +
 arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/ppc44x_simple.c |    2 +-
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c           |   70 +++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=SHv8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Comments

Stephen Rothwell March 16, 2012, 2:50 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Josh,

On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:41:38 -0400 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Stephen, could you change linux-next to pull from this tree instead of the
> infradead one?

Done.