diff mbox

[-,linux-next] ARM: ptrace: Fix audit caused compile error

Message ID 1329825855-11902-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Peter Ujfalusi Feb. 21, 2012, 12:04 p.m. UTC
While trying to compile the kernel for ARM (omap2plus_defconfig) the kernel
build fails with:

arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c: In function ‘syscall_trace’:
arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:920:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘audit_syscall_exit’
arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘audit_syscall_entry’
arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:23: error: ‘AUDIT_ARCH_ARMEB’ undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:23: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.o] Error 1

The issue created by commit:
29ef73b7 Kernel: Audit Support For The ARM Platform

We need to include the linux/audit.h header to the arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
file to be able to compile the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Comments

Will Deacon Feb. 21, 2012, 1:16 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:04:15PM +0000, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> While trying to compile the kernel for ARM (omap2plus_defconfig) the kernel
> build fails with:
> 
> arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c: In function ‘syscall_trace’:
> arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:920:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘audit_syscall_exit’
> arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘audit_syscall_entry’
> arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:23: error: ‘AUDIT_ARCH_ARMEB’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:23: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.o] Error 1
> 
> The issue created by commit:
> 29ef73b7 Kernel: Audit Support For The ARM Platform
> 
> We need to include the linux/audit.h header to the arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
> file to be able to compile the kernel.

This was already reported and I think Russell was going to revert the
offending commit, since it needed some rework to handle little-endian
configurations.

I can't see the revert in any of the trees I'm tracking though...

Will
Russell King - ARM Linux Feb. 21, 2012, 1:30 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 01:16:17PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:04:15PM +0000, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > While trying to compile the kernel for ARM (omap2plus_defconfig) the kernel
> > build fails with:
> > 
> > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c: In function ‘syscall_trace’:
> > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:920:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘audit_syscall_exit’
> > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘audit_syscall_entry’
> > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:23: error: ‘AUDIT_ARCH_ARMEB’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:23: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > make[1]: *** [arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.o] Error 1
> > 
> > The issue created by commit:
> > 29ef73b7 Kernel: Audit Support For The ARM Platform
> > 
> > We need to include the linux/audit.h header to the arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
> > file to be able to compile the kernel.
> 
> This was already reported and I think Russell was going to revert the
> offending commit, since it needed some rework to handle little-endian
> configurations.
> 
> I can't see the revert in any of the trees I'm tracking though...

I never pushed that out because I thought someone was going to fix it.
Were any patches produced to fix it?  I can't see anything in the patch
system and I couldn't see anything on the list.

It seems the previous thread about it just died.  Oh well, I guess a
revert is what's required after all.
Eric Paris Feb. 21, 2012, 1:35 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 13:30 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 01:16:17PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:04:15PM +0000, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > > While trying to compile the kernel for ARM (omap2plus_defconfig) the kernel
> > > build fails with:
> > > 
> > > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c: In function ‘syscall_trace’:
> > > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:920:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘audit_syscall_exit’
> > > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘audit_syscall_entry’
> > > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:23: error: ‘AUDIT_ARCH_ARMEB’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:23: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > > make[1]: *** [arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.o] Error 1
> > > 
> > > The issue created by commit:
> > > 29ef73b7 Kernel: Audit Support For The ARM Platform
> > > 
> > > We need to include the linux/audit.h header to the arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
> > > file to be able to compile the kernel.
> > 
> > This was already reported and I think Russell was going to revert the
> > offending commit, since it needed some rework to handle little-endian
> > configurations.
> > 
> > I can't see the revert in any of the trees I'm tracking though...
> 
> I never pushed that out because I thought someone was going to fix it.
> Were any patches produced to fix it?  I can't see anything in the patch
> system and I couldn't see anything on the list.
> 
> It seems the previous thread about it just died.  Oh well, I guess a
> revert is what's required after all.

http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=132928424120369&w=2

???
Eric Paris Feb. 21, 2012, 1:49 p.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 08:35 -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 13:30 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 01:16:17PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:04:15PM +0000, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > > > While trying to compile the kernel for ARM (omap2plus_defconfig) the kernel
> > > > build fails with:
> > > > 
> > > > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c: In function ‘syscall_trace’:
> > > > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:920:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘audit_syscall_exit’
> > > > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘audit_syscall_entry’
> > > > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:23: error: ‘AUDIT_ARCH_ARMEB’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:23: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > > > make[1]: *** [arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.o] Error 1
> > > > 
> > > > The issue created by commit:
> > > > 29ef73b7 Kernel: Audit Support For The ARM Platform
> > > > 
> > > > We need to include the linux/audit.h header to the arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
> > > > file to be able to compile the kernel.
> > > 
> > > This was already reported and I think Russell was going to revert the
> > > offending commit, since it needed some rework to handle little-endian
> > > configurations.
> > > 
> > > I can't see the revert in any of the trees I'm tracking though...
> > 
> > I never pushed that out because I thought someone was going to fix it.
> > Were any patches produced to fix it?  I can't see anything in the patch
> > system and I couldn't see anything on the list.
> > 
> > It seems the previous thread about it just died.  Oh well, I guess a
> > revert is what's required after all.
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=132928424120369&w=2
> 
> ???

You probably meant the arch endian bug.  I wrote a patch for it, but
guess i never sent it.  It was just sitting on my audit arm branch.  So
I just sent that one as well.

Thanks Russell!
-Eric
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
index e33870f..8e41ad2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/elf.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
 #include <linux/ptrace.h>
+#include <linux/audit.h>
 #include <linux/user.h>
 #include <linux/security.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>