[TRIVIAL] Removed unused arm_sysctl_init().

Removed unused arm_sysctl_init().
     Renamed arm_sysctl_init1() into arm_sysctl_init().

     Signed-off-by: Alexander Barabash <alexander_barabash@mentor.com>

On 16 February 2012 17:37, Alexander Barabash
<alexander_barabash@mentor.com> wrote:
>
>    Removed unused arm_sysctl_init().
>    Renamed arm_sysctl_init1() into arm_sysctl_init().
>
>    Signed-off-by: Alexander Barabash <alexander_barabash@mentor.com>

This also is textually identical to a patch I just submitted
this week. Are you sure you aren't somehow laundering other
peoples' patches and resubmitting them?

Anyway, please don't commit to qemu-trivial, this is in arm-devs.next.

-- PMM

Am 16.02.2012 18:37, schrieb Alexander Barabash:
> 
>     Removed unused arm_sysctl_init().
>     Renamed arm_sysctl_init1() into arm_sysctl_init().
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Alexander Barabash <alexander_barabash@mentor.com>

This I believe I already reviewed in a patchset from Peter.

Not "trivial" but ARM.

Andreas

> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm_sysctl.c b/hw/arm_sysctl.c
> index 149c639..5f1237b 100644
> --- a/hw/arm_sysctl.c
> +++ b/hw/arm_sysctl.c
> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static void arm_sysctl_gpio_set(void *opaque, int
> line, int level)
>      }
>  }
> 
> -static int arm_sysctl_init1(SysBusDevice *dev)
> +static int arm_sysctl_init(SysBusDevice *dev)
>  {
>      arm_sysctl_state *s = FROM_SYSBUS(arm_sysctl_state, dev);
> 
> @@ -389,18 +389,6 @@ static int arm_sysctl_init1(SysBusDevice *dev)
>      return 0;
>  }
> 
> -/* Legacy helper function.  */
> -void arm_sysctl_init(uint32_t base, uint32_t sys_id, uint32_t proc_id)
> -{
> -    DeviceState *dev;
> -
> -    dev = qdev_create(NULL, "realview_sysctl");
> -    qdev_prop_set_uint32(dev, "sys_id", sys_id);
> -    qdev_init_nofail(dev);
> -    qdev_prop_set_uint32(dev, "proc_id", proc_id);
> -    sysbus_mmio_map(sysbus_from_qdev(dev), 0, base);
> -}
> -
>  static Property arm_sysctl_properties[] = {
>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("sys_id", arm_sysctl_state, sys_id, 0),
>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("proc_id", arm_sysctl_state, proc_id, 0),
> @@ -412,7 +400,7 @@ static void arm_sysctl_class_init(ObjectClass
> *klass, void *data)
>      DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>      SysBusDeviceClass *k = SYS_BUS_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> 
> -    k->init = arm_sysctl_init1;
> +    k->init = arm_sysctl_init;
>      dc->reset = arm_sysctl_reset;
>      dc->vmsd = &vmstate_arm_sysctl;
>      dc->props = arm_sysctl_properties;
> diff --git a/hw/primecell.h b/hw/primecell.h
> index ded0446..7337c3b 100644
> --- a/hw/primecell.h
> +++ b/hw/primecell.h
> @@ -5,9 +5,6 @@
>  /* Also includes some devices that are currently only used by the
>     ARM boards.  */
> 
> -/* arm_sysctl.c */
> -void arm_sysctl_init(uint32_t base, uint32_t sys_id, uint32_t proc_id);
> -
>  /* arm_sysctl GPIO lines */
>  #define ARM_SYSCTL_GPIO_MMC_WPROT 0
>  #define ARM_SYSCTL_GPIO_MMC_CARDIN 1

On 16 February 2012 18:18, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 16 February 2012 17:37, Alexander Barabash
> <alexander_barabash@mentor.com> wrote:
>>
>>    Removed unused arm_sysctl_init().
>>    Renamed arm_sysctl_init1() into arm_sysctl_init().
>>
>>    Signed-off-by: Alexander Barabash <alexander_barabash@mentor.com>
>
> This also is textually identical to a patch I just submitted
> this week. Are you sure you aren't somehow laundering other
> peoples' patches and resubmitting them?

For the avoidance of doubt, this last sentence should have
included the word "accidentally": it is a suggestion your workflow
might be broken, not an accusation.

-- PMM