Message ID | 20231221174412.210807-1-bb@ti.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | sync am65x device tree with Linux v6.7-rc1 | expand |
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:43:46AM -0600, Bryan Brattlof wrote: > Hello Everyone! > > This series gets the am65x booting again along with syncing the device > tree files with v6.7-rc1 Linux. > > The bulk of these patches unify the WKUP SPL board file with the arm64 > files to make future syncs from Linux much easier. In the end the DTBs > should look a lot like what the DTBs look like for the am64x which > is fairly similar to the am65x. > > For those interested in what UART boot looks like: > https://paste.sr.ht/~bryanb/7df8a645dc548912cd806abd5ecab967ef3287bc > > Thanks for reviewing and happy holidays > ~Bryan For the series, Tested-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Nishanth, does this path work for you?
On 15:00-20231221, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:43:46AM -0600, Bryan Brattlof wrote: > > > Hello Everyone! > > > > This series gets the am65x booting again along with syncing the device > > tree files with v6.7-rc1 Linux. > > > > The bulk of these patches unify the WKUP SPL board file with the arm64 > > files to make future syncs from Linux much easier. In the end the DTBs > > should look a lot like what the DTBs look like for the am64x which > > is fairly similar to the am65x. > > > > For those interested in what UART boot looks like: > > https://paste.sr.ht/~bryanb/7df8a645dc548912cd806abd5ecab967ef3287bc > > > > Thanks for reviewing and happy holidays > > ~Bryan > > For the series, > Tested-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> > > Nishanth, does this path work for you? > Other than the minor comments provided in the relevant patches, The following files also need sync up with v6.7-rc1. k3-am65-iot2050-common-pg2.dtsi k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi k3-am6528-iot2050-basic-common.dtsi k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-common.dtsi k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2.dts Jan - could you look at syncing those once an update to this series is posted? We could probably have a smoother v6.8-rc1 from then on.
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 06:39:28AM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 15:00-20231221, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:43:46AM -0600, Bryan Brattlof wrote: > > > > > Hello Everyone! > > > > > > This series gets the am65x booting again along with syncing the device > > > tree files with v6.7-rc1 Linux. > > > > > > The bulk of these patches unify the WKUP SPL board file with the arm64 > > > files to make future syncs from Linux much easier. In the end the DTBs > > > should look a lot like what the DTBs look like for the am64x which > > > is fairly similar to the am65x. > > > > > > For those interested in what UART boot looks like: > > > https://paste.sr.ht/~bryanb/7df8a645dc548912cd806abd5ecab967ef3287bc > > > > > > Thanks for reviewing and happy holidays > > > ~Bryan > > > > For the series, > > Tested-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> > > > > Nishanth, does this path work for you? > > > > Other than the minor comments provided in the relevant patches, > > The following files also need sync up with v6.7-rc1. > > k3-am65-iot2050-common-pg2.dtsi > k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi > k3-am6528-iot2050-basic-common.dtsi > k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-common.dtsi > k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2.dts > > Jan - could you look at syncing those once an update to this series is > posted? We could probably have a smoother v6.8-rc1 from then on. I hope that by v6.8-rc1 time we'll have merged Sumit's patch series and so instead TI platforms will move to the v6.7-dts tag there, and then v6.8-dts once that's out.
On 27.12.23 13:39, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 15:00-20231221, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:43:46AM -0600, Bryan Brattlof wrote: >> >>> Hello Everyone! >>> >>> This series gets the am65x booting again along with syncing the device >>> tree files with v6.7-rc1 Linux. >>> >>> The bulk of these patches unify the WKUP SPL board file with the arm64 >>> files to make future syncs from Linux much easier. In the end the DTBs >>> should look a lot like what the DTBs look like for the am64x which >>> is fairly similar to the am65x. >>> >>> For those interested in what UART boot looks like: >>> https://paste.sr.ht/~bryanb/7df8a645dc548912cd806abd5ecab967ef3287bc >>> >>> Thanks for reviewing and happy holidays >>> ~Bryan >> >> For the series, >> Tested-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> >> >> Nishanth, does this path work for you? >> > > Other than the minor comments provided in the relevant patches, > > The following files also need sync up with v6.7-rc1. > > k3-am65-iot2050-common-pg2.dtsi > k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi > k3-am6528-iot2050-basic-common.dtsi > k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-common.dtsi > k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2.dts > > Jan - could you look at syncing those once an update to this series is > posted? We could probably have a smoother v6.8-rc1 from then on. > We currently plan to sync once support for the new SM variant is in the upstream DT. Do you see other changes that would benefit from an earlier sync? Jan
On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 08:27:34AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 27.12.23 13:39, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > On 15:00-20231221, Tom Rini wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:43:46AM -0600, Bryan Brattlof wrote: > >> > >>> Hello Everyone! > >>> > >>> This series gets the am65x booting again along with syncing the device > >>> tree files with v6.7-rc1 Linux. > >>> > >>> The bulk of these patches unify the WKUP SPL board file with the arm64 > >>> files to make future syncs from Linux much easier. In the end the DTBs > >>> should look a lot like what the DTBs look like for the am64x which > >>> is fairly similar to the am65x. > >>> > >>> For those interested in what UART boot looks like: > >>> https://paste.sr.ht/~bryanb/7df8a645dc548912cd806abd5ecab967ef3287bc > >>> > >>> Thanks for reviewing and happy holidays > >>> ~Bryan > >> > >> For the series, > >> Tested-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> > >> > >> Nishanth, does this path work for you? > >> > > > > Other than the minor comments provided in the relevant patches, > > > > The following files also need sync up with v6.7-rc1. > > > > k3-am65-iot2050-common-pg2.dtsi > > k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi > > k3-am6528-iot2050-basic-common.dtsi > > k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-common.dtsi > > k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2.dts > > > > Jan - could you look at syncing those once an update to this series is > > posted? We could probably have a smoother v6.8-rc1 from then on. > > > > We currently plan to sync once support for the new SM variant is in the > upstream DT. Do you see other changes that would benefit from an earlier > sync? So this sync is because the ref platforms at least do not boot, is iot2050 currently booting?
On 02.01.24 18:42, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 08:27:34AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 27.12.23 13:39, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> On 15:00-20231221, Tom Rini wrote: >>>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:43:46AM -0600, Bryan Brattlof wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello Everyone! >>>>> >>>>> This series gets the am65x booting again along with syncing the device >>>>> tree files with v6.7-rc1 Linux. >>>>> >>>>> The bulk of these patches unify the WKUP SPL board file with the arm64 >>>>> files to make future syncs from Linux much easier. In the end the DTBs >>>>> should look a lot like what the DTBs look like for the am64x which >>>>> is fairly similar to the am65x. >>>>> >>>>> For those interested in what UART boot looks like: >>>>> https://paste.sr.ht/~bryanb/7df8a645dc548912cd806abd5ecab967ef3287bc >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for reviewing and happy holidays >>>>> ~Bryan >>>> >>>> For the series, >>>> Tested-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> >>>> >>>> Nishanth, does this path work for you? >>>> >>> >>> Other than the minor comments provided in the relevant patches, >>> >>> The following files also need sync up with v6.7-rc1. >>> >>> k3-am65-iot2050-common-pg2.dtsi >>> k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi >>> k3-am6528-iot2050-basic-common.dtsi >>> k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-common.dtsi >>> k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2.dts >>> >>> Jan - could you look at syncing those once an update to this series is >>> posted? We could probably have a smoother v6.8-rc1 from then on. >>> >> >> We currently plan to sync once support for the new SM variant is in the >> upstream DT. Do you see other changes that would benefit from an earlier >> sync? > > So this sync is because the ref platforms at least do not boot, is > iot2050 currently booting? It was booting with ~v2024.01-rc4 before Christmas, didn't try latest master yet. Jan
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 06:10:55AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 02.01.24 18:42, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 08:27:34AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> On 27.12.23 13:39, Nishanth Menon wrote: > >>> On 15:00-20231221, Tom Rini wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:43:46AM -0600, Bryan Brattlof wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hello Everyone! > >>>>> > >>>>> This series gets the am65x booting again along with syncing the device > >>>>> tree files with v6.7-rc1 Linux. > >>>>> > >>>>> The bulk of these patches unify the WKUP SPL board file with the arm64 > >>>>> files to make future syncs from Linux much easier. In the end the DTBs > >>>>> should look a lot like what the DTBs look like for the am64x which > >>>>> is fairly similar to the am65x. > >>>>> > >>>>> For those interested in what UART boot looks like: > >>>>> https://paste.sr.ht/~bryanb/7df8a645dc548912cd806abd5ecab967ef3287bc > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks for reviewing and happy holidays > >>>>> ~Bryan > >>>> > >>>> For the series, > >>>> Tested-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> > >>>> > >>>> Nishanth, does this path work for you? > >>>> > >>> > >>> Other than the minor comments provided in the relevant patches, > >>> > >>> The following files also need sync up with v6.7-rc1. > >>> > >>> k3-am65-iot2050-common-pg2.dtsi > >>> k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi > >>> k3-am6528-iot2050-basic-common.dtsi > >>> k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-common.dtsi > >>> k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2.dts > >>> > >>> Jan - could you look at syncing those once an update to this series is > >>> posted? We could probably have a smoother v6.8-rc1 from then on. > >>> > >> > >> We currently plan to sync once support for the new SM variant is in the > >> upstream DT. Do you see other changes that would benefit from an earlier > >> sync? > > > > So this sync is because the ref platforms at least do not boot, is > > iot2050 currently booting? > > It was booting with ~v2024.01-rc4 before Christmas, didn't try latest > master yet. OK, then it should still be fine but please do confirm if you have the cycles, thanks.