diff mbox

pass -no_pie to LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC on darwin

Message ID 20111203152523.GA9331@bromo.med.uc.edu
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Jack Howarth Dec. 3, 2011, 3:25 p.m. UTC
FSF gcc currently doesn't handle -fno-pie and friends properly under Lion.
The darwin11 linker now defaults to -pie and must be explicitly passed -no_pie
in such cases. The following patch extends LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC to handle
those instances which should pass -no_pie to the linker. The gcc.dg/darwin-segaddr.c
testcase is also fixed by explicitly passing -fno-pie on dg-options since the test
is meaningless for PIE. These patches also eliminate the excessive error failure 
currently since in gcc.dg/20020312-2.c as -fno-pic will now pass -no_pie to the
linker which eliminates the linker warning...

ld: warning: PIE disabled. Absolute addressing (perhaps -mdynamic-no-pic) not allowed in code signed PIE, but used in _f from /var/tmp//ccVNy9V9.o. To fix this warning, don't compile with -mdynamic-no-pic or link with -Wl,-no_pie

Bootstrap and regression tested on x86_64-apple-darwin11. 

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-12/msg00287.html

Okay for gcc trunk and backports to gcc-4_5-branch/gcc-4_6-branch?
                Jack
Note that when -mmacosx-version-min=10.6 is used under Lion, the linker doesn't default
to -pie so only the case of targeting 10.7 or later has to be considered.

gcc/

2011-12-03  Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>

	* gcc/config/darwin10.h (LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC):
	  Pass -no_pie for non-PIC code when targeting 10.7 or later.

gcc/testsuite/

2011-12-03  Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>

	* gcc.dg/darwin-segaddr.c: Use -no-pie.

Comments

Mike Stump Dec. 4, 2011, 6:45 a.m. UTC | #1
On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:25 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> FSF gcc currently doesn't handle -fno-pie and friends properly under Lion.
> The darwin11 linker now defaults to -pie

> Okay for gcc trunk and backports to gcc-4_5-branch/gcc-4_6-branch?

Ok.
Jack Howarth Dec. 4, 2011, 5:09 p.m. UTC | #2
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 10:45:18PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:25 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > FSF gcc currently doesn't handle -fno-pie and friends properly under Lion.
> > The darwin11 linker now defaults to -pie
> 
> > Okay for gcc trunk and backports to gcc-4_5-branch/gcc-4_6-branch?
> 
> Ok.

Mike,
   Thanks for the commit. This leaves us with the boehm-gc testsuite failures...

FAIL: boehm-gc.c/gctest.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: boehm-gc.c/leak_test.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: boehm-gc.lib/staticrootstest.c -O2 execution test

at -m32/-m64 on x86_64-apple-darwin11 due to the -pie linker default. Iain had wanted
to leave these in place to encourage boehm-gc to be fixed but I doubt that is a realistic
goal in the near/middle term. Perhaps we could patch boehm-gc/testsuite/lib/boehm-gc.exp
to pass -fno-pie on darwin (now that it is functional)?
         Jack
Mike Stump Dec. 4, 2011, 5:28 p.m. UTC | #3
On Dec 4, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 10:45:18PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:25 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> FSF gcc currently doesn't handle -fno-pie and friends properly under Lion.
>>> The darwin11 linker now defaults to -pie
>> 
>>> Okay for gcc trunk and backports to gcc-4_5-branch/gcc-4_6-branch?
>> 
>> Ok.
> 
> Mike,
>   Thanks for the commit. This leaves us with the boehm-gc testsuite failures...
> 
> FAIL: boehm-gc.c/gctest.c -O2 execution test
> FAIL: boehm-gc.c/leak_test.c -O2 execution test
> FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c -O2 execution test
> FAIL: boehm-gc.lib/staticrootstest.c -O2 execution test
> 
> at -m32/-m64 on x86_64-apple-darwin11 due to the -pie linker default. Iain had wanted
> to leave these in place to encourage boehm-gc to be fixed but I doubt that is a realistic
> goal in the near/middle term. Perhaps we could patch boehm-gc/testsuite/lib/boehm-gc.exp
> to pass -fno-pie on darwin (now that it is functional)?

I think we should just find a way to add -fno-pie...  Are there any flags that are added because we are doing gc that we can key off of?
diff mbox

Patch

Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/darwin-segaddr.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/darwin-segaddr.c	(revision 181953)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/darwin-segaddr.c	(working copy)
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ 
 /* Check that -segaddr gets through and works.  */
 /* { dg-do run { target *-*-darwin* } } */
-/* { dg-options "-O0 -segaddr __TEST 0x200000" { target { *-*-darwin* && { ! lp64 } } } } */
-/* { dg-options "-O0 -segaddr __TEST 0x110000000" { target { *-*-darwin* && lp64 } } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O0 -segaddr __TEST 0x200000 -fno-pie" { target { *-*-darwin* && { ! lp64 } } } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O0 -segaddr __TEST 0x110000000 -fno-pie" { target { *-*-darwin* && lp64 } } } */
 
 extern void abort ();
 
Index: gcc/config/darwin10.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/darwin10.h	(revision 181953)
+++ gcc/config/darwin10.h	(working copy)
@@ -26,7 +26,9 @@  along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  
 #define LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC \
 "%:version-compare(>= 10.6 mmacosx-version-min= -no_compact_unwind) \
    %{!static:%{!static-libgcc: \
-      %:version-compare(>= 10.6 mmacosx-version-min= -lSystem) } } %G %L"
+      %:version-compare(>= 10.6 mmacosx-version-min= -lSystem) } } \
+   %{fno-pic|fno-PIC|fno-pie|fno-PIE|fapple-kext|mkernel|static|mdynamic-no-pic: \
+      %:version-compare(>= 10.7 mmacosx-version-min= -no_pie) } %G %L"
 
 #undef DEF_MIN_OSX_VERSION
 #define DEF_MIN_OSX_VERSION "10.6"