diff mbox series

pinctrl: qcom: Move clearing pending IRQ to .irq_request_resources callback

Message ID 1604561884-10166-1-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org
State New
Headers show
Series pinctrl: qcom: Move clearing pending IRQ to .irq_request_resources callback | expand

Commit Message

Maulik Shah Nov. 5, 2020, 7:38 a.m. UTC
When GPIOs that are routed to PDC are used as output they can still latch
the IRQ pending at GIC. As a result the spurious IRQ was handled when the
client driver change the direction to input to starts using it as IRQ.

Currently such erroneous latched IRQ are cleared with .irq_enable callback
however if the driver continue to use GPIO as interrupt and invokes
disable_irq() followed by enable_irq() then everytime during enable_irq()
previously latched interrupt gets cleared.

This can make edge IRQs not seen after enable_irq() if they had arrived
after the driver has invoked disable_irq() and were pending at GIC.

Move clearing erroneous IRQ to .irq_request_resources callback as this is
the place where GPIO direction is changed as input and its locked as IRQ.

While at this add a missing check to invoke msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask()
from .irq_enable callback only when GPIO is not routed to PDC.

Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy")
Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Comments

Linus Walleij Nov. 10, 2020, 1:31 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 8:38 AM Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> wrote:

> When GPIOs that are routed to PDC are used as output they can still latch
> the IRQ pending at GIC. As a result the spurious IRQ was handled when the
> client driver change the direction to input to starts using it as IRQ.
>
> Currently such erroneous latched IRQ are cleared with .irq_enable callback
> however if the driver continue to use GPIO as interrupt and invokes
> disable_irq() followed by enable_irq() then everytime during enable_irq()
> previously latched interrupt gets cleared.
>
> This can make edge IRQs not seen after enable_irq() if they had arrived
> after the driver has invoked disable_irq() and were pending at GIC.
>
> Move clearing erroneous IRQ to .irq_request_resources callback as this is
> the place where GPIO direction is changed as input and its locked as IRQ.
>
> While at this add a missing check to invoke msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask()
> from .irq_enable callback only when GPIO is not routed to PDC.
>
> Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy")
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>

This looks critical so I applied it for fixes so we get some
rotation in linux-next.

If Bjorn has other opinions he will tell us :)

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Bjorn Andersson Nov. 10, 2020, 9:28 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue 10 Nov 07:31 CST 2020, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 8:38 AM Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> 
> > When GPIOs that are routed to PDC are used as output they can still latch
> > the IRQ pending at GIC. As a result the spurious IRQ was handled when the
> > client driver change the direction to input to starts using it as IRQ.
> >
> > Currently such erroneous latched IRQ are cleared with .irq_enable callback
> > however if the driver continue to use GPIO as interrupt and invokes
> > disable_irq() followed by enable_irq() then everytime during enable_irq()
> > previously latched interrupt gets cleared.
> >
> > This can make edge IRQs not seen after enable_irq() if they had arrived
> > after the driver has invoked disable_irq() and were pending at GIC.
> >
> > Move clearing erroneous IRQ to .irq_request_resources callback as this is
> > the place where GPIO direction is changed as input and its locked as IRQ.
> >
> > While at this add a missing check to invoke msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask()
> > from .irq_enable callback only when GPIO is not routed to PDC.
> >
> > Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy")
> > Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
> 
> This looks critical so I applied it for fixes so we get some
> rotation in linux-next.
> 
> If Bjorn has other opinions he will tell us :)
> 

No objections, the patch looks reasonable to me.

Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

Regards,
Bjorn
Doug Anderson Nov. 11, 2020, 4:09 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi,

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 11:38 PM Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> When GPIOs that are routed to PDC are used as output they can still latch
> the IRQ pending at GIC. As a result the spurious IRQ was handled when the
> client driver change the direction to input to starts using it as IRQ.
>
> Currently such erroneous latched IRQ are cleared with .irq_enable callback
> however if the driver continue to use GPIO as interrupt and invokes
> disable_irq() followed by enable_irq() then everytime during enable_irq()
> previously latched interrupt gets cleared.
>
> This can make edge IRQs not seen after enable_irq() if they had arrived
> after the driver has invoked disable_irq() and were pending at GIC.
>
> Move clearing erroneous IRQ to .irq_request_resources callback as this is
> the place where GPIO direction is changed as input and its locked as IRQ.
>
> While at this add a missing check to invoke msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask()
> from .irq_enable callback only when GPIO is not routed to PDC.
>
> Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy")
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> index c4bcda9..77a25bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> @@ -815,21 +815,14 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool status_clear)
>
>  static void msm_gpio_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
> -       /*
> -        * Clear the interrupt that may be pending before we enable
> -        * the line.
> -        * This is especially a problem with the GPIOs routed to the
> -        * PDC. These GPIOs are direct-connect interrupts to the GIC.
> -        * Disabling the interrupt line at the PDC does not prevent
> -        * the interrupt from being latched at the GIC. The state at
> -        * GIC needs to be cleared before enabling.
> -        */
> -       if (d->parent_data) {
> -               irq_chip_set_parent_state(d, IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, 0);
> +       struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +       struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> +
> +       if (d->parent_data)
>                 irq_chip_enable_parent(d);
> -       }
>
> -       msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(d, true);
> +       if (!test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->skip_wake_irqs))
> +               msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(d, true);

I'm happy that this patch landed and it seems a definite improvement.
However, it seems like we're still clearing important edges in the
case where the PDC isn't used.  Can't we just unconditionally move the
clearing to msm_gpio_irq_reqres()?

-Doug
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
index c4bcda9..77a25bd 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
@@ -815,21 +815,14 @@  static void msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool status_clear)
 
 static void msm_gpio_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	/*
-	 * Clear the interrupt that may be pending before we enable
-	 * the line.
-	 * This is especially a problem with the GPIOs routed to the
-	 * PDC. These GPIOs are direct-connect interrupts to the GIC.
-	 * Disabling the interrupt line at the PDC does not prevent
-	 * the interrupt from being latched at the GIC. The state at
-	 * GIC needs to be cleared before enabling.
-	 */
-	if (d->parent_data) {
-		irq_chip_set_parent_state(d, IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, 0);
+	struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+
+	if (d->parent_data)
 		irq_chip_enable_parent(d);
-	}
 
-	msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(d, true);
+	if (!test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->skip_wake_irqs))
+		msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(d, true);
 }
 
 static void msm_gpio_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
@@ -1104,6 +1097,19 @@  static int msm_gpio_irq_reqres(struct irq_data *d)
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto out;
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Clear the interrupt that may be pending before we enable
+	 * the line.
+	 * This is especially a problem with the GPIOs routed to the
+	 * PDC. These GPIOs are direct-connect interrupts to the GIC.
+	 * Disabling the interrupt line at the PDC does not prevent
+	 * the interrupt from being latched at the GIC. The state at
+	 * GIC needs to be cleared before enabling.
+	 */
+	if (d->parent_data && test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->skip_wake_irqs))
+		irq_chip_set_parent_state(d, IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, 0);
+
 	return 0;
 out:
 	module_put(gc->owner);