| Message ID | 20200914155714.GA43910@black.fi.intel.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [GIT,PULL] intel-pinctrl for 5.9-2 | expand |
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:57 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> One fix for v5.9 cycle from Hans.
Hm the pinctrl fixes are based on v5.9-rc2 and I got a ton of changes with this
so I suppose it is based on some other -rc.
I will attempt to just cherry-pick it to fixes.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:08 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:57 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > One fix for v5.9 cycle from Hans. > > Hm the pinctrl fixes are based on v5.9-rc2 and I got a ton of changes with this > so I suppose it is based on some other -rc. > > I will attempt to just cherry-pick it to fixes. It will break fast forward. Is it a problem to have v5.9-rc4 there?
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:43 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:08 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:57 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > One fix for v5.9 cycle from Hans. > > > > Hm the pinctrl fixes are based on v5.9-rc2 and I got a ton of changes with this > > so I suppose it is based on some other -rc. > > > > I will attempt to just cherry-pick it to fixes. > > It will break fast forward. Is it a problem to have v5.9-rc4 there? Not really other than it is kludgy to merge it in, but is it a problem that I just cherry-picked it and signed it off instead? Is something built on top of it since you're concerned about fast-forwarding? Yours, Linus Walleij
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:48 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:43 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:08 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:57 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > One fix for v5.9 cycle from Hans. > > > > > > Hm the pinctrl fixes are based on v5.9-rc2 and I got a ton of changes with this > > > so I suppose it is based on some other -rc. > > > > > > I will attempt to just cherry-pick it to fixes. > > > > It will break fast forward. Is it a problem to have v5.9-rc4 there? > > Not really other than it is kludgy to merge it in, but is it a problem > that I just cherry-picked it and signed it off instead? Is something > built on top of it since you're concerned about fast-forwarding? I rethought the scenario and I guess it should be fine. Please, go ahead with cherry picking (it's only one commit anyway). Thanks!
Hi Linus, One fix for v5.9 cycle from Hans. Thanks, With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko The following changes since commit f4d51dffc6c01a9e94650d95ce0104964f8ae822: Linux 5.9-rc4 (2020-09-06 17:11:40 -0700) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pinctrl/intel.git tags/intel-pinctrl-v5.9-2 for you to fetch changes up to 3488737093e7f60c7764b9a3cc66648adcbddca4: pinctrl: cherryview: Preserve CHV_PADCTRL1_INVRXTX_TXDATA flag on GPIOs (2020-09-07 11:56:43 +0300) ---------------------------------------------------------------- intel-pinctrl for v5.9-2 * Preserve Tx buffer inversion on Cherriview GPIOs The following is an automated git shortlog grouped by driver: cherryview: - Preserve CHV_PADCTRL1_INVRXTX_TXDATA flag on GPIOs ---------------------------------------------------------------- Hans de Goede (1): pinctrl: cherryview: Preserve CHV_PADCTRL1_INVRXTX_TXDATA flag on GPIOs drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-cherryview.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)