Message ID | 20200820190635.379657-1-danielhb413@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/1] spapr_vscsi: do not allow device hotplug | expand |
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 04:06:35PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > We do not implement hotplug in the vscsi bus, but we forgot to > tell qdev about it. The result is that users are able to hotplug > devices in the vscsi bus, the devices appear in qdev, but they > aren't usable by the guest OS unless the user reboots it first. > > Setting qbus hotplug_handler to NULL will tell qdev-monitor, via > qbus_is_hotpluggable(), that we do not support hotplug operations > in spapr_vscsi. > > Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862059 > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> That was much easier than I feared. Nice! Applied to ppc-for-5.2. > --- > hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c > index d17dc03c73..57f0a1336f 100644 > --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c > +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c > @@ -1219,6 +1219,9 @@ static void spapr_vscsi_realize(SpaprVioDevice *dev, Error **errp) > > scsi_bus_new(&s->bus, sizeof(s->bus), DEVICE(dev), > &vscsi_scsi_info, NULL); > + > + /* ibmvscsi SCSI bus does not allow hotplug. */ > + qbus_set_hotplug_handler(BUS(&s->bus), NULL); > } > > void spapr_vscsi_create(SpaprVioBus *bus)
Cc'ing Markus On 8/20/20 9:06 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > We do not implement hotplug in the vscsi bus, but we forgot to > tell qdev about it. The result is that users are able to hotplug > devices in the vscsi bus, the devices appear in qdev, but they > aren't usable by the guest OS unless the user reboots it first. > > Setting qbus hotplug_handler to NULL will tell qdev-monitor, via > qbus_is_hotpluggable(), that we do not support hotplug operations > in spapr_vscsi. > > Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862059 > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> > --- > hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c > index d17dc03c73..57f0a1336f 100644 > --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c > +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c > @@ -1219,6 +1219,9 @@ static void spapr_vscsi_realize(SpaprVioDevice *dev, Error **errp) > > scsi_bus_new(&s->bus, sizeof(s->bus), DEVICE(dev), > &vscsi_scsi_info, NULL); > + > + /* ibmvscsi SCSI bus does not allow hotplug. */ > + qbus_set_hotplug_handler(BUS(&s->bus), NULL); Can't this be a problem later in DeviceClass::unrealize()? I was expecting something like, overwriting the parent bus type: -- >8 -- @@ -1271,6 +1271,7 @@ static void spapr_vscsi_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data) DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass); SpaprVioDeviceClass *k = VIO_SPAPR_DEVICE_CLASS(klass); + k->bus_type = NULL; /* ibmvscsi SCSI bus does not allow hotplug. */ k->realize = spapr_vscsi_realize; k->reset = spapr_vscsi_reset; k->devnode = spapr_vscsi_devnode; --- > } > > void spapr_vscsi_create(SpaprVioBus *bus) >
On 8/21/20 8:08 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Cc'ing Markus > > On 8/20/20 9:06 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >> We do not implement hotplug in the vscsi bus, but we forgot to >> tell qdev about it. The result is that users are able to hotplug >> devices in the vscsi bus, the devices appear in qdev, but they >> aren't usable by the guest OS unless the user reboots it first. >> >> Setting qbus hotplug_handler to NULL will tell qdev-monitor, via >> qbus_is_hotpluggable(), that we do not support hotplug operations >> in spapr_vscsi. >> >> Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862059 >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> >> --- >> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c >> index d17dc03c73..57f0a1336f 100644 >> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c >> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c >> @@ -1219,6 +1219,9 @@ static void spapr_vscsi_realize(SpaprVioDevice *dev, Error **errp) >> >> scsi_bus_new(&s->bus, sizeof(s->bus), DEVICE(dev), >> &vscsi_scsi_info, NULL); >> + >> + /* ibmvscsi SCSI bus does not allow hotplug. */ >> + qbus_set_hotplug_handler(BUS(&s->bus), NULL); > > Can't this be a problem later in DeviceClass::unrealize()? Not as far as I've tested. A call to qbus_set_hotplug_handler(bus,NULL) after setting it to NULL isn't breaking anything either (just tested). I verified before sending the patch that setting hotplug_handler to NULL is done in some unrealize() calls in buses, but not on devices. And I'm not sure which instance would cause an unrealize() in the device to fail if the hotplug_handler of the bus is NULL. As far as I'm concerned this shouldn't be happening in our case here, where we're not dealing with hotplug devices in the bus at all. Which potential problems are you referring to? > > I was expecting something like, overwriting the parent bus type: > > -- >8 -- > @@ -1271,6 +1271,7 @@ static void spapr_vscsi_class_init(ObjectClass > *klass, void *data) > DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass); > SpaprVioDeviceClass *k = VIO_SPAPR_DEVICE_CLASS(klass); > > + k->bus_type = NULL; /* ibmvscsi SCSI bus does not allow hotplug. */ > k->realize = spapr_vscsi_realize; > k->reset = spapr_vscsi_reset; > k->devnode = spapr_vscsi_devnode; > --- spapr_vscsi is not a bus, is an interface. Setting NULL to bus_type in spapr_vio breaks guest init: qemu-system-ppc64: /home/danielhb/qemu/hw/core/qdev.c:102: qdev_set_parent_bus: Assertion `dc->bus_type && object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(bus), dc->bus_type)' failed. Aborted I'm not so sure this would be better than what I'm doing either. qdev_device_add() calls qbus_is_hotpluggable() to see if the chosen bus allows hotplug. This function verifies if bus->hotplug_handler is NULL. What I'm doing is simply setting hotplug_handler to NULL in the SCSI bus instance that belongs to spapr_vscsi. As far as I understand this is a valid use of the qdev API - I should be able to set hotplug_handler to NULL if I don't want devices being hotplugged in the bus I'm instantiating. Either that, or qbus_is_hotpluggable() must check for something else that I can safely turn off. Thanks, DHB > >> } >> >> void spapr_vscsi_create(SpaprVioBus *bus) >> >
On 8/21/20 4:08 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > > > On 8/21/20 8:08 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> Cc'ing Markus >> >> On 8/20/20 9:06 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >>> We do not implement hotplug in the vscsi bus, but we forgot to >>> tell qdev about it. The result is that users are able to hotplug >>> devices in the vscsi bus, the devices appear in qdev, but they >>> aren't usable by the guest OS unless the user reboots it first. >>> >>> Setting qbus hotplug_handler to NULL will tell qdev-monitor, via >>> qbus_is_hotpluggable(), that we do not support hotplug operations >>> in spapr_vscsi. >>> >>> Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862059 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 3 +++ >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c >>> index d17dc03c73..57f0a1336f 100644 >>> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c >>> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c >>> @@ -1219,6 +1219,9 @@ static void spapr_vscsi_realize(SpaprVioDevice >>> *dev, Error **errp) >>> scsi_bus_new(&s->bus, sizeof(s->bus), DEVICE(dev), >>> &vscsi_scsi_info, NULL); >>> + >>> + /* ibmvscsi SCSI bus does not allow hotplug. */ >>> + qbus_set_hotplug_handler(BUS(&s->bus), NULL); >> >> Can't this be a problem later in DeviceClass::unrealize()? > > Not as far as I've tested. A call to qbus_set_hotplug_handler(bus,NULL) > after setting it to NULL isn't breaking anything either (just tested). > > I verified before sending the patch that setting hotplug_handler to > NULL is done in some unrealize() calls in buses, but not on devices. > And I'm not sure which instance would cause an unrealize() in the > device to fail if the hotplug_handler of the bus is NULL. As far as > I'm concerned this shouldn't be happening in our case here, where we're > not dealing with hotplug devices in the bus at all. > > Which potential problems are you referring to? I was wondering if qdev_unrealize() runs similar checks than qdev_realize(). > >> >> I was expecting something like, overwriting the parent bus type: >> >> -- >8 -- >> @@ -1271,6 +1271,7 @@ static void spapr_vscsi_class_init(ObjectClass >> *klass, void *data) >> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass); >> SpaprVioDeviceClass *k = VIO_SPAPR_DEVICE_CLASS(klass); >> >> + k->bus_type = NULL; /* ibmvscsi SCSI bus does not allow hotplug. */ >> k->realize = spapr_vscsi_realize; >> k->reset = spapr_vscsi_reset; >> k->devnode = spapr_vscsi_devnode; >> --- > > spapr_vscsi is not a bus, is an interface. Setting NULL to bus_type in > spapr_vio > breaks guest init: > > > qemu-system-ppc64: /home/danielhb/qemu/hw/core/qdev.c:102: > qdev_set_parent_bus: Assertion `dc->bus_type && > object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(bus), dc->bus_type)' failed. > Aborted > > > I'm not so sure this would be better than what I'm doing either. > qdev_device_add() > calls qbus_is_hotpluggable() to see if the chosen bus allows hotplug. This > function verifies if bus->hotplug_handler is NULL. What I'm doing is simply > setting hotplug_handler to NULL in the SCSI bus instance that belongs to > spapr_vscsi. As far as I understand this is a valid use of the qdev API - I > should be able to set hotplug_handler to NULL if I don't want devices being > hotplugged in the bus I'm instantiating. Either that, or > qbus_is_hotpluggable() > must check for something else that I can safely turn off. I'm not saying I know the correct way to do that, this is why I added Markus in the loop :) I'm wondering from an API point of view what is the best way to achieve what you want. I'm glad this works this way. > > > Thanks, > > > DHB > > > > >> >>> } >>> void spapr_vscsi_create(SpaprVioBus *bus) >>> >> >
On 8/21/20 11:12 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 8/21/20 4:08 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >> >> >> On 8/21/20 8:08 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> Cc'ing Markus >>> >>> On 8/20/20 9:06 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >>>> We do not implement hotplug in the vscsi bus, but we forgot to >>>> tell qdev about it. The result is that users are able to hotplug >>>> devices in the vscsi bus, the devices appear in qdev, but they >>>> aren't usable by the guest OS unless the user reboots it first. >>>> >>>> Setting qbus hotplug_handler to NULL will tell qdev-monitor, via >>>> qbus_is_hotpluggable(), that we do not support hotplug operations >>>> in spapr_vscsi. >>>> >>>> Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862059 >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> >>>> --- >>>> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 3 +++ >>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c >>>> index d17dc03c73..57f0a1336f 100644 >>>> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c >>>> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c >>>> @@ -1219,6 +1219,9 @@ static void spapr_vscsi_realize(SpaprVioDevice >>>> *dev, Error **errp) >>>> scsi_bus_new(&s->bus, sizeof(s->bus), DEVICE(dev), >>>> &vscsi_scsi_info, NULL); >>>> + >>>> + /* ibmvscsi SCSI bus does not allow hotplug. */ >>>> + qbus_set_hotplug_handler(BUS(&s->bus), NULL); >>> >>> Can't this be a problem later in DeviceClass::unrealize()? >> >> Not as far as I've tested. A call to qbus_set_hotplug_handler(bus,NULL) >> after setting it to NULL isn't breaking anything either (just tested). >> >> I verified before sending the patch that setting hotplug_handler to >> NULL is done in some unrealize() calls in buses, but not on devices. >> And I'm not sure which instance would cause an unrealize() in the >> device to fail if the hotplug_handler of the bus is NULL. As far as >> I'm concerned this shouldn't be happening in our case here, where we're >> not dealing with hotplug devices in the bus at all. >> >> Which potential problems are you referring to? > > I was wondering if qdev_unrealize() runs similar checks than > qdev_realize(). I have no idea. I would need to check/study the code to answer that. > >> >>> >>> I was expecting something like, overwriting the parent bus type: >>> >>> -- >8 -- >>> @@ -1271,6 +1271,7 @@ static void spapr_vscsi_class_init(ObjectClass >>> *klass, void *data) >>> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass); >>> SpaprVioDeviceClass *k = VIO_SPAPR_DEVICE_CLASS(klass); >>> >>> + k->bus_type = NULL; /* ibmvscsi SCSI bus does not allow hotplug. */ >>> k->realize = spapr_vscsi_realize; >>> k->reset = spapr_vscsi_reset; >>> k->devnode = spapr_vscsi_devnode; >>> --- >> >> spapr_vscsi is not a bus, is an interface. Setting NULL to bus_type in >> spapr_vio >> breaks guest init: >> >> >> qemu-system-ppc64: /home/danielhb/qemu/hw/core/qdev.c:102: >> qdev_set_parent_bus: Assertion `dc->bus_type && >> object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(bus), dc->bus_type)' failed. >> Aborted >> >> >> I'm not so sure this would be better than what I'm doing either. >> qdev_device_add() >> calls qbus_is_hotpluggable() to see if the chosen bus allows hotplug. This >> function verifies if bus->hotplug_handler is NULL. What I'm doing is simply >> setting hotplug_handler to NULL in the SCSI bus instance that belongs to >> spapr_vscsi. As far as I understand this is a valid use of the qdev API - I >> should be able to set hotplug_handler to NULL if I don't want devices being >> hotplugged in the bus I'm instantiating. Either that, or >> qbus_is_hotpluggable() >> must check for something else that I can safely turn off. > > I'm not saying I know the correct way to do that, this is why I added > Markus in the loop :) I'm wondering from an API point of view what is > the best way to achieve what you want. I'm glad this works this way. It's alright to question hehehe far too often we're remembered that 'works this way' is a looong way from 'this is the right way'. Let's see if Markus agrees with this approach or if there is a better way of doing it. I'll happily change for a safer approach that will not hit me in the back in the future. Thanks, DHB > >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> DHB >> >> >> >> >>> >>>> } >>>> void spapr_vscsi_create(SpaprVioBus *bus) >>>> >>> >> >
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> writes: > Cc'ing Markus > > On 8/20/20 9:06 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >> We do not implement hotplug in the vscsi bus, but we forgot to >> tell qdev about it. The result is that users are able to hotplug >> devices in the vscsi bus, the devices appear in qdev, but they >> aren't usable by the guest OS unless the user reboots it first. >> >> Setting qbus hotplug_handler to NULL will tell qdev-monitor, via >> qbus_is_hotpluggable(), that we do not support hotplug operations >> in spapr_vscsi. >> >> Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862059 >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> >> --- >> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c >> index d17dc03c73..57f0a1336f 100644 >> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c >> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c >> @@ -1219,6 +1219,9 @@ static void spapr_vscsi_realize(SpaprVioDevice *dev, Error **errp) >> >> scsi_bus_new(&s->bus, sizeof(s->bus), DEVICE(dev), >> &vscsi_scsi_info, NULL); >> + >> + /* ibmvscsi SCSI bus does not allow hotplug. */ >> + qbus_set_hotplug_handler(BUS(&s->bus), NULL); > > Can't this be a problem later in DeviceClass::unrealize()? Can't say offhand. Cc'ing QOM maintainers for actual expertise. A quick grep coughs up virtio_serial_device_realize() / virtio_serial_device_unrealize(), which set and unset the hotplug handler of a bus their device provides. Not the same as the code above, just a clue that messing with a bus's hotplug handler in a realize method can work. qbus_set_hotplug_handler() is entirely undocumented. It sets a link. Might be intended for use by the device that provides the bus. > I was expecting something like, overwriting the parent bus type: > > -- >8 -- > @@ -1271,6 +1271,7 @@ static void spapr_vscsi_class_init(ObjectClass > *klass, void *data) > DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass); > SpaprVioDeviceClass *k = VIO_SPAPR_DEVICE_CLASS(klass); > > + k->bus_type = NULL; /* ibmvscsi SCSI bus does not allow hotplug. */ > k->realize = spapr_vscsi_realize; > k->reset = spapr_vscsi_reset; > k->devnode = spapr_vscsi_devnode; k->bus_type does not exist. Do you mean dc->bus_type? TYPE_VIO_SPAPR_VSCSI_DEVICE is a subtype of TYPE_VIO_SPAPR_DEVICE is a subtype of TYPE_DEVICE. TYPE_DEVICE is bus-less, i.e. (concrete) instances do not plug into a bus. TYPE_VIO_SPAPR_DEVICE has bus_type TYPE_SPAPR_VIO_BUS, i.e. (concrete) instances plug into a TYPE_SPAPR_VIO_BUS. Both hot and cold plug. Zapping TYPE_VIO_SPAPR_VSCSI_DEVICE's bus_type makes it bus-less. I doubt that's okay. Also, it's not just about hot plug. What are you trying to accomplish?
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 08:27:28AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> writes: > > > Cc'ing Markus > > > > On 8/20/20 9:06 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > >> We do not implement hotplug in the vscsi bus, but we forgot to > >> tell qdev about it. The result is that users are able to hotplug > >> devices in the vscsi bus, the devices appear in qdev, but they > >> aren't usable by the guest OS unless the user reboots it first. > >> > >> Setting qbus hotplug_handler to NULL will tell qdev-monitor, via > >> qbus_is_hotpluggable(), that we do not support hotplug operations > >> in spapr_vscsi. > >> > >> Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862059 > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 3 +++ > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c > >> index d17dc03c73..57f0a1336f 100644 > >> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c > >> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c > >> @@ -1219,6 +1219,9 @@ static void spapr_vscsi_realize(SpaprVioDevice *dev, Error **errp) > >> > >> scsi_bus_new(&s->bus, sizeof(s->bus), DEVICE(dev), > >> &vscsi_scsi_info, NULL); > >> + > >> + /* ibmvscsi SCSI bus does not allow hotplug. */ > >> + qbus_set_hotplug_handler(BUS(&s->bus), NULL); > > > > Can't this be a problem later in DeviceClass::unrealize()? > > Can't say offhand. Cc'ing QOM maintainers for actual expertise. > > A quick grep coughs up virtio_serial_device_realize() / > virtio_serial_device_unrealize(), which set and unset the hotplug > handler of a bus their device provides. Not the same as the code above, Hm, it almost is, actually. Only difference is that virtio serial is setting the hotplug handler to something, rather than disabling it. > just a clue that messing with a bus's hotplug handler in a realize > method can work. > > qbus_set_hotplug_handler() is entirely undocumented. It sets a link. > Might be intended for use by the device that provides the bus. Heh. > > I was expecting something like, overwriting the parent bus type: > > > > -- >8 -- > > @@ -1271,6 +1271,7 @@ static void spapr_vscsi_class_init(ObjectClass > > *klass, void *data) > > DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass); > > SpaprVioDeviceClass *k = VIO_SPAPR_DEVICE_CLASS(klass); > > > > + k->bus_type = NULL; /* ibmvscsi SCSI bus does not allow hotplug. */ > > k->realize = spapr_vscsi_realize; > > k->reset = spapr_vscsi_reset; > > k->devnode = spapr_vscsi_devnode; > > k->bus_type does not exist. Do you mean dc->bus_type? Yeah, I'm pretty sure changing the bus type is going to be worse than setting the hotplug handler. > TYPE_VIO_SPAPR_VSCSI_DEVICE is a subtype of TYPE_VIO_SPAPR_DEVICE is a > subtype of TYPE_DEVICE. > > TYPE_DEVICE is bus-less, i.e. (concrete) instances do not plug into a > bus. > > TYPE_VIO_SPAPR_DEVICE has bus_type TYPE_SPAPR_VIO_BUS, i.e. (concrete) > instances plug into a TYPE_SPAPR_VIO_BUS. Both hot and cold plug. > > Zapping TYPE_VIO_SPAPR_VSCSI_DEVICE's bus_type makes it bus-less. I > doubt that's okay. Also, it's not just about hot plug. What are you > trying to accomplish? I'm pretty sure all of the above is not relevant. It's the subordinate bus of TYPE_VIO_SPAPR_VSCSI_DEVICE on which we want to disable hotplugging, not the parent bus. We can't hotplug spapr-vscsi controllers, but that's fine. What we're trying to address here is that the controller supports a TYPE_SCSI_BUS, onto which disks can normally be hotplugged, but not in this case.
diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c index d17dc03c73..57f0a1336f 100644 --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c @@ -1219,6 +1219,9 @@ static void spapr_vscsi_realize(SpaprVioDevice *dev, Error **errp) scsi_bus_new(&s->bus, sizeof(s->bus), DEVICE(dev), &vscsi_scsi_info, NULL); + + /* ibmvscsi SCSI bus does not allow hotplug. */ + qbus_set_hotplug_handler(BUS(&s->bus), NULL); } void spapr_vscsi_create(SpaprVioBus *bus)
We do not implement hotplug in the vscsi bus, but we forgot to tell qdev about it. The result is that users are able to hotplug devices in the vscsi bus, the devices appear in qdev, but they aren't usable by the guest OS unless the user reboots it first. Setting qbus hotplug_handler to NULL will tell qdev-monitor, via qbus_is_hotpluggable(), that we do not support hotplug operations in spapr_vscsi. Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862059 Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> --- hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)