Message ID | 203654d82a17e18f746b6eb1f27af62247f94abd.1592836143.git.fweimer@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | RFC: elf: glibc-hwcaps support | expand |
Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org> writes: > diff --git a/elf/dl-tunables.h b/elf/dl-tunables.h > index 969e50327b..f05eb50c2f 100644 > --- a/elf/dl-tunables.h > +++ b/elf/dl-tunables.h > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ > #ifndef _TUNABLES_H_ > #define _TUNABLES_H_ > > +#include <stdbool.h> > + LGTM. I think patches #1 and #2 should go in regardless of the other patches.
* Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho: > Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org> writes: > >> diff --git a/elf/dl-tunables.h b/elf/dl-tunables.h >> index 969e50327b..f05eb50c2f 100644 >> --- a/elf/dl-tunables.h >> +++ b/elf/dl-tunables.h >> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ >> #ifndef _TUNABLES_H_ >> #define _TUNABLES_H_ >> >> +#include <stdbool.h> >> + > > LGTM. Thanks. > I think patches #1 and #2 should go in regardless of the other patches. Yes, I think the ld.so --help stuff is independently useful. Florian
diff --git a/elf/dl-tunables.h b/elf/dl-tunables.h index 969e50327b..f05eb50c2f 100644 --- a/elf/dl-tunables.h +++ b/elf/dl-tunables.h @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ #ifndef _TUNABLES_H_ #define _TUNABLES_H_ +#include <stdbool.h> + #if !HAVE_TUNABLES static inline void __always_inline