diff mbox series

[v9,bpf-next,2/3] libbpf: add support for command BPF_ENABLE_STATS

Message ID 20200430071506.1408910-3-songliubraving@fb.com
State Accepted
Delegated to: BPF Maintainers
Headers show
Series bpf: sharing bpf runtime stats with | expand

Commit Message

Song Liu April 30, 2020, 7:15 a.m. UTC
bpf_enable_stats() is added to enable given stats.

Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c      | 10 ++++++++++
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h      |  1 +
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map |  1 +
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

Comments

Alexei Starovoitov May 2, 2020, 8 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:15 AM Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> wrote:
>
> bpf_enable_stats() is added to enable given stats.
>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
...
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> index 335b457b3a25..1901b2777854 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_load_btf(void *btf, __u32 btf_size, char *log_buf,
>  LIBBPF_API int bpf_task_fd_query(int pid, int fd, __u32 flags, char *buf,
>                                  __u32 *buf_len, __u32 *prog_id, __u32 *fd_type,
>                                  __u64 *probe_offset, __u64 *probe_addr);
> +LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);

I see odd warning here while building selftests

In file included from runqslower.c:10:
.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf.h:234:38:
warning: ‘enum bpf_stats_type’ declared inside parameter list will not
be visible outside of this definition or declaration
  234 | LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);

Since this warning is printed only when building runqslower
and the rest of selftests are fine, I'm guessing
it's a makefile issue with order of includes?

Andrii, could you please take a look ?
Not urgent. Just flagging for visibility.
Song Liu May 4, 2020, 5:45 p.m. UTC | #2
> On May 2, 2020, at 1:00 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:15 AM Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> wrote:
>> 
>> bpf_enable_stats() is added to enable given stats.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> ...
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
>> index 335b457b3a25..1901b2777854 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
>> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_load_btf(void *btf, __u32 btf_size, char *log_buf,
>> LIBBPF_API int bpf_task_fd_query(int pid, int fd, __u32 flags, char *buf,
>>                                 __u32 *buf_len, __u32 *prog_id, __u32 *fd_type,
>>                                 __u64 *probe_offset, __u64 *probe_addr);
>> +LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);
> 
> I see odd warning here while building selftests
> 
> In file included from runqslower.c:10:
> .../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf.h:234:38:
> warning: ‘enum bpf_stats_type’ declared inside parameter list will not
> be visible outside of this definition or declaration
>  234 | LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);
> 
> Since this warning is printed only when building runqslower
> and the rest of selftests are fine, I'm guessing
> it's a makefile issue with order of includes?
> 
> Andrii, could you please take a look ?
> Not urgent. Just flagging for visibility.

The following should fix it. 

Thanks,
Song

=========================== 8< ==============================

From 485c28c8e2cbcc22aa8fcda82f8f599411faa755 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 10:36:26 -0700
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] runqslower: include proper uapi/bpf.h

runqslower doesn't specify include path for uapi/bpf.h. This causes the
following warning:

In file included from runqslower.c:10:
.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf.h:234:38:
warning: 'enum bpf_stats_type' declared inside parameter list will not
be visible outside of this definition or declaration
  234 | LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);

Fix this by adding -I tools/includ/uapi to the Makefile.

Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
---
 tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile b/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile
index 8a6f82e56a24..722a29a988cd 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile
+++ b/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ BPFTOOL ?= $(DEFAULT_BPFTOOL)
 LIBBPF_SRC := $(abspath ../../lib/bpf)
 BPFOBJ := $(OUTPUT)/libbpf.a
 BPF_INCLUDE := $(OUTPUT)
-INCLUDES := -I$(OUTPUT) -I$(BPF_INCLUDE) -I$(abspath ../../lib)
+INCLUDES := -I$(OUTPUT) -I$(BPF_INCLUDE) -I$(abspath ../../lib)        \
+       -I$(abspath ../../include/uapi)
 CFLAGS := -g -Wall

 # Try to detect best kernel BTF source
--
2.24.1
Andrii Nakryiko May 4, 2020, 6:32 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 10:47 AM Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 2, 2020, at 1:00 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:15 AM Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> bpf_enable_stats() is added to enable given stats.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> > ...
> >> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> >> index 335b457b3a25..1901b2777854 100644
> >> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> >> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> >> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_load_btf(void *btf, __u32 btf_size, char *log_buf,
> >> LIBBPF_API int bpf_task_fd_query(int pid, int fd, __u32 flags, char *buf,
> >>                                 __u32 *buf_len, __u32 *prog_id, __u32 *fd_type,
> >>                                 __u64 *probe_offset, __u64 *probe_addr);
> >> +LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);
> >
> > I see odd warning here while building selftests
> >
> > In file included from runqslower.c:10:
> > .../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf.h:234:38:
> > warning: ‘enum bpf_stats_type’ declared inside parameter list will not
> > be visible outside of this definition or declaration
> >  234 | LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);
> >
> > Since this warning is printed only when building runqslower
> > and the rest of selftests are fine, I'm guessing
> > it's a makefile issue with order of includes?
> >
> > Andrii, could you please take a look ?
> > Not urgent. Just flagging for visibility.
>
> The following should fix it.
>
> Thanks,
> Song
>
> =========================== 8< ==============================
>
> From 485c28c8e2cbcc22aa8fcda82f8f599411faa755 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 10:36:26 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] runqslower: include proper uapi/bpf.h
>
> runqslower doesn't specify include path for uapi/bpf.h. This causes the
> following warning:
>
> In file included from runqslower.c:10:
> .../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf.h:234:38:
> warning: 'enum bpf_stats_type' declared inside parameter list will not
> be visible outside of this definition or declaration
>   234 | LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);
>
> Fix this by adding -I tools/includ/uapi to the Makefile.
>
> Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> ---

LGTM. Thanks!

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>

>  tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile b/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile
> index 8a6f82e56a24..722a29a988cd 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile
> @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ BPFTOOL ?= $(DEFAULT_BPFTOOL)
>  LIBBPF_SRC := $(abspath ../../lib/bpf)
>  BPFOBJ := $(OUTPUT)/libbpf.a
>  BPF_INCLUDE := $(OUTPUT)
> -INCLUDES := -I$(OUTPUT) -I$(BPF_INCLUDE) -I$(abspath ../../lib)
> +INCLUDES := -I$(OUTPUT) -I$(BPF_INCLUDE) -I$(abspath ../../lib)        \
> +       -I$(abspath ../../include/uapi)
>  CFLAGS := -g -Wall
>
>  # Try to detect best kernel BTF source
> --
> 2.24.1
>
Alexei Starovoitov May 10, 2020, 1:03 a.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 10:45 AM Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 2, 2020, at 1:00 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:15 AM Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> bpf_enable_stats() is added to enable given stats.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> > ...
> >> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> >> index 335b457b3a25..1901b2777854 100644
> >> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> >> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> >> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_load_btf(void *btf, __u32 btf_size, char *log_buf,
> >> LIBBPF_API int bpf_task_fd_query(int pid, int fd, __u32 flags, char *buf,
> >>                                 __u32 *buf_len, __u32 *prog_id, __u32 *fd_type,
> >>                                 __u64 *probe_offset, __u64 *probe_addr);
> >> +LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);
> >
> > I see odd warning here while building selftests
> >
> > In file included from runqslower.c:10:
> > .../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf.h:234:38:
> > warning: ‘enum bpf_stats_type’ declared inside parameter list will not
> > be visible outside of this definition or declaration
> >  234 | LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);
> >
> > Since this warning is printed only when building runqslower
> > and the rest of selftests are fine, I'm guessing
> > it's a makefile issue with order of includes?
> >
> > Andrii, could you please take a look ?
> > Not urgent. Just flagging for visibility.
>
> The following should fix it.
>
> Thanks,
> Song
>
> =========================== 8< ==============================
>
> From 485c28c8e2cbcc22aa8fcda82f8f599411faa755 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 10:36:26 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] runqslower: include proper uapi/bpf.h
>
> runqslower doesn't specify include path for uapi/bpf.h. This causes the
> following warning:
>
> In file included from runqslower.c:10:
> .../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf.h:234:38:
> warning: 'enum bpf_stats_type' declared inside parameter list will not
> be visible outside of this definition or declaration
>   234 | LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);
>
> Fix this by adding -I tools/includ/uapi to the Makefile.
>
> Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>

Applied.
In the future please always send patches as fresh email
otherwise they don't register in patchworks.
I applied this one manually.
Andrii Nakryiko June 21, 2020, 3:07 a.m. UTC | #5
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 10:47 AM Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 2, 2020, at 1:00 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:15 AM Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> bpf_enable_stats() is added to enable given stats.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> > ...
> >> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> >> index 335b457b3a25..1901b2777854 100644
> >> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> >> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> >> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_load_btf(void *btf, __u32 btf_size, char *log_buf,
> >> LIBBPF_API int bpf_task_fd_query(int pid, int fd, __u32 flags, char *buf,
> >>                                 __u32 *buf_len, __u32 *prog_id, __u32 *fd_type,
> >>                                 __u64 *probe_offset, __u64 *probe_addr);
> >> +LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);
> >
> > I see odd warning here while building selftests
> >
> > In file included from runqslower.c:10:
> > .../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf.h:234:38:
> > warning: ‘enum bpf_stats_type’ declared inside parameter list will not
> > be visible outside of this definition or declaration
> >  234 | LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);
> >
> > Since this warning is printed only when building runqslower
> > and the rest of selftests are fine, I'm guessing
> > it's a makefile issue with order of includes?
> >
> > Andrii, could you please take a look ?
> > Not urgent. Just flagging for visibility.
>
> The following should fix it.
>
> Thanks,
> Song
>
> =========================== 8< ==============================
>
> From 485c28c8e2cbcc22aa8fcda82f8f599411faa755 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 10:36:26 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] runqslower: include proper uapi/bpf.h
>
> runqslower doesn't specify include path for uapi/bpf.h. This causes the
> following warning:
>
> In file included from runqslower.c:10:
> .../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf.h:234:38:
> warning: 'enum bpf_stats_type' declared inside parameter list will not
> be visible outside of this definition or declaration
>   234 | LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);
>
> Fix this by adding -I tools/includ/uapi to the Makefile.
>
> Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> ---
>  tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile b/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile
> index 8a6f82e56a24..722a29a988cd 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile
> @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ BPFTOOL ?= $(DEFAULT_BPFTOOL)
>  LIBBPF_SRC := $(abspath ../../lib/bpf)
>  BPFOBJ := $(OUTPUT)/libbpf.a
>  BPF_INCLUDE := $(OUTPUT)
> -INCLUDES := -I$(OUTPUT) -I$(BPF_INCLUDE) -I$(abspath ../../lib)
> +INCLUDES := -I$(OUTPUT) -I$(BPF_INCLUDE) -I$(abspath ../../lib)        \
> +       -I$(abspath ../../include/uapi)
>  CFLAGS := -g -Wall
>
>  # Try to detect best kernel BTF source
> --
> 2.24.1
>

This is a partial work-around just for runqslower, which has a luxury
to access the very latest linux/bpf.h. Any other system that doesn't
have the very latest bpf.h header will get warnings about undefined
`enum bpf_stats_type` definition, even if they don't use
bpf_stats_enable(). I think the proper fix here is to add forward
declaration of this enum in libbpf/bpf.h. I'll send a patch in a few
minutes.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
index 8f2f0958d446..43322f0d6c7f 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
@@ -841,3 +841,13 @@  int bpf_task_fd_query(int pid, int fd, __u32 flags, char *buf, __u32 *buf_len,
 
 	return err;
 }
+
+int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type)
+{
+	union bpf_attr attr;
+
+	memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr));
+	attr.enable_stats.type = type;
+
+	return sys_bpf(BPF_ENABLE_STATS, &attr, sizeof(attr));
+}
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
index 335b457b3a25..1901b2777854 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
@@ -231,6 +231,7 @@  LIBBPF_API int bpf_load_btf(void *btf, __u32 btf_size, char *log_buf,
 LIBBPF_API int bpf_task_fd_query(int pid, int fd, __u32 flags, char *buf,
 				 __u32 *buf_len, __u32 *prog_id, __u32 *fd_type,
 				 __u64 *probe_offset, __u64 *probe_addr);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);
 
 #ifdef __cplusplus
 } /* extern "C" */
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
index 7cd49aa38005..e03bd4db827e 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@  LIBBPF_0.0.8 {
 
 LIBBPF_0.0.9 {
 	global:
+		bpf_enable_stats;
 		bpf_link_get_fd_by_id;
 		bpf_link_get_next_id;
 } LIBBPF_0.0.8;