| Message ID | cover.1587713792.git.ashwinh@vmware.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Backport to 4.9- ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity | expand |
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:51:34AM +0530, ashwin-h wrote: > [PATCH 1/5] ext4: avoid declaring fs inconsistent due to invalid file > handles > This patch is backported as functionality in this commit is used by > Patch 2 in this patchset. > > [PATCH 2/5] ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity > Backport to 4.9 > > [PATCH 3/5] ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal > [PATCH 4/5] ext4: fix block validity checks for journal inodes using > [PATCH 5/5] ext4: unsigned int compared against zero > Fixes issues found in Patch 2 in this patchset. > > These patches addresses CVE-2019-19319 I can't take patches for 4.9 that are not also in 4.14, for the obvious reason that you never want to upgrade to a newer kernel and get regressions. So can you provide a backported series for the 4.14 tree too? Then I can take these. thanks, greg k-h
I have sent patches for 4.14 tree
Thanks,
Ashwin
On 29/04/20, 6:29 PM, "Greg KH" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:51:34AM +0530, ashwin-h wrote:
> [PATCH 1/5] ext4: avoid declaring fs inconsistent due to invalid file
> handles
> This patch is backported as functionality in this commit is used by
> Patch 2 in this patchset.
>
> [PATCH 2/5] ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity
> Backport to 4.9
>
> [PATCH 3/5] ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal
> [PATCH 4/5] ext4: fix block validity checks for journal inodes using
> [PATCH 5/5] ext4: unsigned int compared against zero
> Fixes issues found in Patch 2 in this patchset.
>
> These patches addresses CVE-2019-19319
I can't take patches for 4.9 that are not also in 4.14, for the obvious
reason that you never want to upgrade to a newer kernel and get
regressions.
So can you provide a backported series for the 4.14 tree too? Then I
can take these.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:39:45PM +0000, Ashwin H wrote:
> I have sent patches for 4.14 tree
Thank you, all of these are now queued up.
greg k-h
[PATCH 1/5] ext4: avoid declaring fs inconsistent due to invalid file handles This patch is backported as functionality in this commit is used by Patch 2 in this patchset. [PATCH 2/5] ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity Backport to 4.9 [PATCH 3/5] ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal [PATCH 4/5] ext4: fix block validity checks for journal inodes using [PATCH 5/5] ext4: unsigned int compared against zero Fixes issues found in Patch 2 in this patchset. These patches addresses CVE-2019-19319 Colin Ian King (1): ext4: unsigned int compared against zero Theodore Ts'o (4): ext4: avoid declaring fs inconsistent due to invalid file handles ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal inode ext4: fix block validity checks for journal inodes using indirect blocks fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/ext4/ext4.h | 15 ++++++++++++-- fs/ext4/extents.c | 12 +++++++---- fs/ext4/ialloc.c | 2 +- fs/ext4/inode.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 2 +- fs/ext4/namei.c | 4 ++-- fs/ext4/resize.c | 5 +++-- fs/ext4/super.c | 19 +++++------------ 9 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)