[next] rtc: ds1307: check for failed memory allocation on wdt

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Currently a failed memory allocation will lead to a null pointer
dereference on point wdt.  Fix this by checking for a failed allocation
and adding error return handling to function ds1307_wdt_register.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference null return")
Fixes: fd90d48db037 ("rtc: ds1307: add support for watchdog timer on ds1388")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

On 02/04/2020 14:14:41+0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Currently a failed memory allocation will lead to a null pointer
> dereference on point wdt.  Fix this by checking for a failed allocation
> and adding error return handling to function ds1307_wdt_register.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference null return")
> Fixes: fd90d48db037 ("rtc: ds1307: add support for watchdog timer on ds1388")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
> index fad042118862..95c5b6facc59 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
> @@ -1665,14 +1665,16 @@ static const struct watchdog_ops ds1388_wdt_ops = {
>  
>  };
>  
> -static void ds1307_wdt_register(struct ds1307 *ds1307)
> +static int ds1307_wdt_register(struct ds1307 *ds1307)
>  {
>  	struct watchdog_device	*wdt;
>  
>  	if (ds1307->type != ds_1388)
> -		return;
> +		return 0;
>  
>  	wdt = devm_kzalloc(ds1307->dev, sizeof(*wdt), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!wdt)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	wdt->info = &ds1388_wdt_info;
>  	wdt->ops = &ds1388_wdt_ops;
> @@ -1683,10 +1685,13 @@ static void ds1307_wdt_register(struct ds1307 *ds1307)
>  	watchdog_init_timeout(wdt, 0, ds1307->dev);
>  	watchdog_set_drvdata(wdt, ds1307);
>  	devm_watchdog_register_device(ds1307->dev, wdt);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  #else
> -static void ds1307_wdt_register(struct ds1307 *ds1307)
> +static int ds1307_wdt_register(struct ds1307 *ds1307)
>  {
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_WATCHDOG_CORE */
>  
> @@ -1979,9 +1984,9 @@ static int ds1307_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  
>  	ds1307_hwmon_register(ds1307);
>  	ds1307_clks_register(ds1307);
> -	ds1307_wdt_register(ds1307);
> +	err = ds1307_wdt_register(ds1307);
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return err;

As the watchdog is optional and the RTC can work properly without the
watchdog driver being compiled, my opinion is that the error should not
be returned.

On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 02:14:41PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> @@ -1979,9 +1984,9 @@ static int ds1307_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  
>  	ds1307_hwmon_register(ds1307);
>  	ds1307_clks_register(ds1307);
> -	ds1307_wdt_register(ds1307);
> +	err = ds1307_wdt_register(ds1307);
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return err;
>  
>  exit:
>  	return err;

This bit is weird.  I guess just delete the "return 0;" without
introducing a new "return err;".

regards,
dan carpenter