diff mbox series

[next] bpf: Test_verifier: fix spelling mistake "arithmatic" -> "arithmetic"

Message ID 20200331100030.41372-1-colin.king@canonical.com
State Accepted
Delegated to: BPF Maintainers
Headers show
Series [next] bpf: Test_verifier: fix spelling mistake "arithmatic" -> "arithmetic" | expand

Commit Message

Colin Ian King March 31, 2020, 10 a.m. UTC 
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

There are a couple of spelling mistakes in two literal strings, fix them.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Daniel Borkmann April 2, 2020, 10:50 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 3/31/20 12:00 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> There are a couple of spelling mistakes in two literal strings, fix them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Applied, thanks!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
index 4d0d09574bf4..a253a064e6e0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ 
 	.result = REJECT
 },
 {
-	"bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmatic. test1",
+	"bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmetic. test1",
 	.insns = {
 	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
 	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ 
 	.result = ACCEPT
 },
 {
-	"bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmatic. test2",
+	"bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmetic. test2",
 	.insns = {
 	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
 	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),