| Message ID | 20200224091602.15306-1-ilan.peer@intel.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Support PASN with SAE, FILS and FT | expand |
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:15:48AM +0200, Ilan Peer wrote: > The patch set continues the work introduced in the previous patch set: > "Support base Pre association Security Negotiation (PASN)" > > The patch set adds support for SAE, FILS and FT key derivation as part > of PASN authentication. > > In addition, support is also added for PASN comeback flow. As the anti > clogging for PASN can use the infra used for SAE anti clogging and > comeback, the patch set includes changes that allow sharing of code > for both SAE and PASN. > > Ilan Peer (14): > PASN: Support PASN with SAE key derivation > AP: Support PASN with SAE key derivation > tests: Add PASN tests with SAE > PASN: Support PASN with FILS key derivation > AP: Support PASN with FILS key derivation > tests: Add PASN with FILS tests > AP: Rename SAE anti clogging variables and functions > AP: Move anti clogging handling code > AP: Add support for PASN comeback flow > PASN: Add support for comeback flow to the wpa_supplicant > tests: Add PASN test with comeback flow > PASN: Support PASN with FT key derivation > AP: Support PASN with FT key derivation > tests: Add PASN tests with FT key derivation Taken into account the comments I have on many (if not more or less all) patches in the previous set regarding whether P802.11az/D2.0 is stable enough to be included in hostap.git, I'd expect that most of these would not be applicable without the earlier patches. As such, I'm dropping this set from my queue until the previous set has been addressed (which may need to wait for P802.11az to standard initial SA ballot to get the ANA assignments done). Does that sound fine to you or is there something in these that should be considered earlier?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> > Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2020 00:28 > To: Peer, Ilan <ilan.peer@intel.com> > Cc: hostap@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Support PASN with SAE, FILS and FT > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:15:48AM +0200, Ilan Peer wrote: > > The patch set continues the work introduced in the previous patch set: > > "Support base Pre association Security Negotiation (PASN)" > > > > The patch set adds support for SAE, FILS and FT key derivation as part > > of PASN authentication. > > > > In addition, support is also added for PASN comeback flow. As the anti > > clogging for PASN can use the infra used for SAE anti clogging and > > comeback, the patch set includes changes that allow sharing of code > > for both SAE and PASN. > > > > Ilan Peer (14): > > PASN: Support PASN with SAE key derivation > > AP: Support PASN with SAE key derivation > > tests: Add PASN tests with SAE > > PASN: Support PASN with FILS key derivation > > AP: Support PASN with FILS key derivation > > tests: Add PASN with FILS tests > > AP: Rename SAE anti clogging variables and functions > > AP: Move anti clogging handling code > > AP: Add support for PASN comeback flow > > PASN: Add support for comeback flow to the wpa_supplicant > > tests: Add PASN test with comeback flow > > PASN: Support PASN with FT key derivation > > AP: Support PASN with FT key derivation > > tests: Add PASN tests with FT key derivation > > Taken into account the comments I have on many (if not more or less all) > patches in the previous set regarding whether P802.11az/D2.0 is stable > enough to be included in hostap.git, I'd expect that most of these would not > be applicable without the earlier patches. As such, I'm dropping this set from > my queue until the previous set has been addressed (which may need to > wait for P802.11az to standard initial SA ballot to get the ANA assignments > done). > > Does that sound fine to you or is there something in these that should be > considered earlier? > Sure. Lets wait for things to be more stable. Thanks, Ilan.