Message ID | 20191210033146.GA32522@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
Series | [net/tipc] Replace rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace_pointer() | expand |
On 12/10/19 11:31 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > This commit replaces the use of rcu_swap_protected() with the more > intuitively appealing rcu_replace_pointer() as a step towards removing > rcu_swap_protected(). > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiAsJLw1egFEE=Z7-GGtM6wcvtyytXZA1+BHqta4gg6Hw@mail.gmail.com/ > Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> > Cc: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> > Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> > Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org> > Cc: <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net> > > diff --git a/net/tipc/crypto.c b/net/tipc/crypto.c > index 990a872..64cf831 100644 > --- a/net/tipc/crypto.c > +++ b/net/tipc/crypto.c > @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static char *tipc_key_change_dump(struct tipc_key old, struct tipc_key new, > rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) > > #define tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ > - rcu_swap_protected((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) > + rcu_replace_pointer((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) (ptr) = rcu_replace_pointer((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) > > #define tipc_aead_rcu_replace(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ > do { \ > @@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ static bool tipc_crypto_key_try_align(struct tipc_crypto *rx, u8 new_pending) > > /* Move passive key if any */ > if (key.passive) { > - tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); > + tmp2 = rcu_replace_pointer(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); tipc_aead_rcu_swap() is only called here in TIPC module. If we use rcu_replace_pointer() to switch pointers instead of calling tipc_aead_rcu_swap() macro, I think we should completely remove tipc_aead_rcu_swap(). > x = (key.passive - key.pending + new_pending) % KEY_MAX; > new_passive = (x <= 0) ? x + KEY_MAX : x; > } >
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:36:59PM +0800, Ying Xue wrote: > On 12/10/19 11:31 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > This commit replaces the use of rcu_swap_protected() with the more > > intuitively appealing rcu_replace_pointer() as a step towards removing > > rcu_swap_protected(). > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiAsJLw1egFEE=Z7-GGtM6wcvtyytXZA1+BHqta4gg6Hw@mail.gmail.com/ > > Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> > > Cc: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> > > Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> > > Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org> > > Cc: <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net> > > > > diff --git a/net/tipc/crypto.c b/net/tipc/crypto.c > > index 990a872..64cf831 100644 > > --- a/net/tipc/crypto.c > > +++ b/net/tipc/crypto.c > > @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static char *tipc_key_change_dump(struct tipc_key old, struct tipc_key new, > > rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) > > > > #define tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ > > - rcu_swap_protected((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) > > + rcu_replace_pointer((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) > > (ptr) = rcu_replace_pointer((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) > > > > > #define tipc_aead_rcu_replace(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ > > do { \ > > @@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ static bool tipc_crypto_key_try_align(struct tipc_crypto *rx, u8 new_pending) > > > > /* Move passive key if any */ > > if (key.passive) { > > - tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); > > + tmp2 = rcu_replace_pointer(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); > > tipc_aead_rcu_swap() is only called here in TIPC module. If we use > rcu_replace_pointer() to switch pointers instead of calling > tipc_aead_rcu_swap() macro, I think we should completely remove > tipc_aead_rcu_swap(). Good catch, thank you! How about the following instead? Thanx, Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------ commit 4ee8e2c68b076867b7a5af82a38010fffcab611c Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Date: Mon Dec 9 19:13:45 2019 -0800 net/tipc: Replace rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace_pointer() This commit replaces the use of rcu_swap_protected() with the more intuitively appealing rcu_replace_pointer() as a step towards removing rcu_swap_protected(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiAsJLw1egFEE=Z7-GGtM6wcvtyytXZA1+BHqta4gg6Hw@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org> Cc: <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net> diff --git a/net/tipc/crypto.c b/net/tipc/crypto.c index 990a872..978d2db 100644 --- a/net/tipc/crypto.c +++ b/net/tipc/crypto.c @@ -257,9 +257,6 @@ static char *tipc_key_change_dump(struct tipc_key old, struct tipc_key new, #define tipc_aead_rcu_ptr(rcu_ptr, lock) \ rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) -#define tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ - rcu_swap_protected((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) - #define tipc_aead_rcu_replace(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ do { \ typeof(rcu_ptr) __tmp = rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), \ @@ -1189,7 +1186,7 @@ static bool tipc_crypto_key_try_align(struct tipc_crypto *rx, u8 new_pending) /* Move passive key if any */ if (key.passive) { - tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); + tmp2 = rcu_replace_pointer(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); x = (key.passive - key.pending + new_pending) % KEY_MAX; new_passive = (x <= 0) ? x + KEY_MAX : x; }
On 12/11/19 6:38 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > commit 4ee8e2c68b076867b7a5af82a38010fffcab611c > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> > Date: Mon Dec 9 19:13:45 2019 -0800 > > net/tipc: Replace rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace_pointer() > > This commit replaces the use of rcu_swap_protected() with the more > intuitively appealing rcu_replace_pointer() as a step towards removing > rcu_swap_protected(). > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiAsJLw1egFEE=Z7-GGtM6wcvtyytXZA1+BHqta4gg6Hw@mail.gmail.com/ > Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> > Cc: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> > Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> > Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org> > Cc: <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net> > Acked-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> > diff --git a/net/tipc/crypto.c b/net/tipc/crypto.c > index 990a872..978d2db 100644 > --- a/net/tipc/crypto.c > +++ b/net/tipc/crypto.c > @@ -257,9 +257,6 @@ static char *tipc_key_change_dump(struct tipc_key old, struct tipc_key new, > #define tipc_aead_rcu_ptr(rcu_ptr, lock) \ > rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) > > -#define tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ > - rcu_swap_protected((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) > - > #define tipc_aead_rcu_replace(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ > do { \ > typeof(rcu_ptr) __tmp = rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), \ > @@ -1189,7 +1186,7 @@ static bool tipc_crypto_key_try_align(struct tipc_crypto *rx, u8 new_pending) > > /* Move passive key if any */ > if (key.passive) { > - tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); > + tmp2 = rcu_replace_pointer(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); > x = (key.passive - key.pending + new_pending) % KEY_MAX; > new_passive = (x <= 0) ? x + KEY_MAX : x; > } >
Hi Ying, Paul, Please see my comments inline. Thanks! BR/Tuong -----Original Message----- From: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 8:32 AM To: paulmck@kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; mingo@kernel.org; tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; kernel-team@fb.com; torvalds@linux-foundation.org; davem@davemloft.net Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion] [PATCH net/tipc] Replace rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace_pointer() On 12/11/19 6:38 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > commit 4ee8e2c68b076867b7a5af82a38010fffcab611c > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> > Date: Mon Dec 9 19:13:45 2019 -0800 > > net/tipc: Replace rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace_pointer() > > This commit replaces the use of rcu_swap_protected() with the more > intuitively appealing rcu_replace_pointer() as a step towards removing > rcu_swap_protected(). > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiAsJLw1egFEE=Z7-GGtM6wcvtyytXZA1+BHqta4g g6Hw@mail.gmail.com/ > Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> > Cc: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> > Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> > Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org> > Cc: <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net> > Acked-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> > diff --git a/net/tipc/crypto.c b/net/tipc/crypto.c > index 990a872..978d2db 100644 > --- a/net/tipc/crypto.c > +++ b/net/tipc/crypto.c > @@ -257,9 +257,6 @@ static char *tipc_key_change_dump(struct tipc_key old, struct tipc_key new, > #define tipc_aead_rcu_ptr(rcu_ptr, lock) \ > rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) > > -#define tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ > - rcu_swap_protected((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) > - > #define tipc_aead_rcu_replace(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ > do { \ > typeof(rcu_ptr) __tmp = rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), \ > @@ -1189,7 +1186,7 @@ static bool tipc_crypto_key_try_align(struct tipc_crypto *rx, u8 new_pending) > > /* Move passive key if any */ > if (key.passive) { > - tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); > + tmp2 = rcu_replace_pointer(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); The 3rd parameter should be the lockdep condition checking instead of the spinlock's pointer i.e. "lockdep_is_held(&rx->lock)"? That's why I'd prefer to use the 'tipc_aead_rcu_swap ()' macro, which is clear & concise at least for the context here. It might be re-used later as well... > x = (key.passive - key.pending + new_pending) % KEY_MAX; > new_passive = (x <= 0) ? x + KEY_MAX : x; > } >
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 09:00:39AM +0700, Tuong Lien Tong wrote: > Hi Ying, Paul, > > Please see my comments inline. Thanks! Good catch! > BR/Tuong > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 8:32 AM > To: paulmck@kernel.org > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; mingo@kernel.org; > tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; kernel-team@fb.com; > torvalds@linux-foundation.org; davem@davemloft.net > Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion] [PATCH net/tipc] Replace rcu_swap_protected() > with rcu_replace_pointer() > > On 12/11/19 6:38 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > commit 4ee8e2c68b076867b7a5af82a38010fffcab611c > > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> > > Date: Mon Dec 9 19:13:45 2019 -0800 > > > > net/tipc: Replace rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace_pointer() > > > > This commit replaces the use of rcu_swap_protected() with the more > > intuitively appealing rcu_replace_pointer() as a step towards removing > > rcu_swap_protected(). > > > > Link: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiAsJLw1egFEE=Z7-GGtM6wcvtyytXZA1+BHqta4g > g6Hw@mail.gmail.com/ > > Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> > > Cc: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> > > Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> > > Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org> > > Cc: <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Acked-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> As in the following? If so, I will be very happy to apply your Acked-by. Thanx, Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------ commit 4c0855120704e7a578dc6862ae57babf6dc9bc77 Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Date: Mon Dec 9 19:13:45 2019 -0800 net/tipc: Replace rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace_pointer() This commit replaces the use of rcu_swap_protected() with the more intuitively appealing rcu_replace_pointer() as a step towards removing rcu_swap_protected(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiAsJLw1egFEE=Z7-GGtM6wcvtyytXZA1+BHqta4gg6Hw@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> [ paulmck: Updated based on Ying Xue and Tuong Lien Tong feedback. ] Cc: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org> Cc: <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net> diff --git a/net/tipc/crypto.c b/net/tipc/crypto.c index 990a872..39a13b4 100644 --- a/net/tipc/crypto.c +++ b/net/tipc/crypto.c @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static char *tipc_key_change_dump(struct tipc_key old, struct tipc_key new, rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) #define tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ - rcu_swap_protected((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) + rcu_replace_pointer((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) #define tipc_aead_rcu_replace(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ do { \ @@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ static bool tipc_crypto_key_try_align(struct tipc_crypto *rx, u8 new_pending) /* Move passive key if any */ if (key.passive) { - tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); + tmp2 = tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); x = (key.passive - key.pending + new_pending) % KEY_MAX; new_passive = (x <= 0) ? x + KEY_MAX : x; }
On 12/11/19 11:17 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >> Acked-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> > As in the following? If so, I will be very happy to apply your Acked-by. Yes. Thanks!
On 12/11/19 10:00 AM, Tuong Lien Tong wrote: >> >> /* Move passive key if any */ >> if (key.passive) { >> - tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); >> + tmp2 = rcu_replace_pointer(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, > &rx->lock); > The 3rd parameter should be the lockdep condition checking instead of the > spinlock's pointer i.e. "lockdep_is_held(&rx->lock)"? > That's why I'd prefer to use the 'tipc_aead_rcu_swap ()' macro, which is > clear & concise at least for the context here. It might be re-used later as > well... > Right. The 3rd parameter of rcu_replace_pointer() should be "lockdep_is_held(&rx->lock)" instead of "&rx->lock".
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 12:42:00PM +0800, Ying Xue wrote: > On 12/11/19 10:00 AM, Tuong Lien Tong wrote: > >> > >> /* Move passive key if any */ > >> if (key.passive) { > >> - tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); > >> + tmp2 = rcu_replace_pointer(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, > > &rx->lock); > > The 3rd parameter should be the lockdep condition checking instead of the > > spinlock's pointer i.e. "lockdep_is_held(&rx->lock)"? > > That's why I'd prefer to use the 'tipc_aead_rcu_swap ()' macro, which is > > clear & concise at least for the context here. It might be re-used later as > > well... > > > > Right. The 3rd parameter of rcu_replace_pointer() should be > "lockdep_is_held(&rx->lock)" instead of "&rx->lock". Like this? Thanx, Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------ commit 575bb4ba1b22383656760feb3d122e11656ccdfd Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Date: Mon Dec 9 19:13:45 2019 -0800 net/tipc: Replace rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace_pointer() This commit replaces the use of rcu_swap_protected() with the more intuitively appealing rcu_replace_pointer() as a step towards removing rcu_swap_protected(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiAsJLw1egFEE=Z7-GGtM6wcvtyytXZA1+BHqta4gg6Hw@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> [ paulmck: Updated based on Ying Xue and Tuong Lien Tong feedback. ] Cc: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org> Cc: <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net> diff --git a/net/tipc/crypto.c b/net/tipc/crypto.c index 990a872..c8c47fc 100644 --- a/net/tipc/crypto.c +++ b/net/tipc/crypto.c @@ -257,9 +257,6 @@ static char *tipc_key_change_dump(struct tipc_key old, struct tipc_key new, #define tipc_aead_rcu_ptr(rcu_ptr, lock) \ rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) -#define tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ - rcu_swap_protected((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) - #define tipc_aead_rcu_replace(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ do { \ typeof(rcu_ptr) __tmp = rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), \ @@ -1189,7 +1186,7 @@ static bool tipc_crypto_key_try_align(struct tipc_crypto *rx, u8 new_pending) /* Move passive key if any */ if (key.passive) { - tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); + tmp2 = rcu_replace_pointer(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, lockdep_is_held(&rx->lock)); x = (key.passive - key.pending + new_pending) % KEY_MAX; new_passive = (x <= 0) ? x + KEY_MAX : x; }
On 12/12/19 2:46 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 12:42:00PM +0800, Ying Xue wrote: >> On 12/11/19 10:00 AM, Tuong Lien Tong wrote: >>>> >>>> /* Move passive key if any */ >>>> if (key.passive) { >>>> - tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); >>>> + tmp2 = rcu_replace_pointer(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, >>> &rx->lock); >>> The 3rd parameter should be the lockdep condition checking instead of the >>> spinlock's pointer i.e. "lockdep_is_held(&rx->lock)"? >>> That's why I'd prefer to use the 'tipc_aead_rcu_swap ()' macro, which is >>> clear & concise at least for the context here. It might be re-used later as >>> well... >>> >> >> Right. The 3rd parameter of rcu_replace_pointer() should be >> "lockdep_is_held(&rx->lock)" instead of "&rx->lock". > > Like this? Yes, I think it's better to set the 3rd parameter of rcu_replace_pointer() with "lockdep_is_held(&rx->lock)". > > Thanx, Paul > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > commit 575bb4ba1b22383656760feb3d122e11656ccdfd > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> > Date: Mon Dec 9 19:13:45 2019 -0800 > > net/tipc: Replace rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace_pointer() > > This commit replaces the use of rcu_swap_protected() with the more > intuitively appealing rcu_replace_pointer() as a step towards removing > rcu_swap_protected(). > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiAsJLw1egFEE=Z7-GGtM6wcvtyytXZA1+BHqta4gg6Hw@mail.gmail.com/ > Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> > [ paulmck: Updated based on Ying Xue and Tuong Lien Tong feedback. ] > Cc: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> > Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> > Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org> > Cc: <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net> > > diff --git a/net/tipc/crypto.c b/net/tipc/crypto.c > index 990a872..c8c47fc 100644 > --- a/net/tipc/crypto.c > +++ b/net/tipc/crypto.c > @@ -257,9 +257,6 @@ static char *tipc_key_change_dump(struct tipc_key old, struct tipc_key new, > #define tipc_aead_rcu_ptr(rcu_ptr, lock) \ > rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) > > -#define tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ > - rcu_swap_protected((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) > - > #define tipc_aead_rcu_replace(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ > do { \ > typeof(rcu_ptr) __tmp = rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), \ > @@ -1189,7 +1186,7 @@ static bool tipc_crypto_key_try_align(struct tipc_crypto *rx, u8 new_pending) > > /* Move passive key if any */ > if (key.passive) { > - tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); > + tmp2 = rcu_replace_pointer(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, lockdep_is_held(&rx->lock)); > x = (key.passive - key.pending + new_pending) % KEY_MAX; > new_passive = (x <= 0) ? x + KEY_MAX : x; > } >
diff --git a/net/tipc/crypto.c b/net/tipc/crypto.c index 990a872..64cf831 100644 --- a/net/tipc/crypto.c +++ b/net/tipc/crypto.c @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static char *tipc_key_change_dump(struct tipc_key old, struct tipc_key new, rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) #define tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ - rcu_swap_protected((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) + rcu_replace_pointer((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock)) #define tipc_aead_rcu_replace(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \ do { \ @@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ static bool tipc_crypto_key_try_align(struct tipc_crypto *rx, u8 new_pending) /* Move passive key if any */ if (key.passive) { - tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); + tmp2 = rcu_replace_pointer(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock); x = (key.passive - key.pending + new_pending) % KEY_MAX; new_passive = (x <= 0) ? x + KEY_MAX : x; }
This commit replaces the use of rcu_swap_protected() with the more intuitively appealing rcu_replace_pointer() as a step towards removing rcu_swap_protected(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiAsJLw1egFEE=Z7-GGtM6wcvtyytXZA1+BHqta4gg6Hw@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org> Cc: <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>