| Message ID | 20191129094809.26684-9-frankja@linux.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | s390x: Protected Virtualization support | expand |
On 29.11.19 10:48, Janosch Frank wrote: > CPU resets for protected guests need to be done via Ultravisor > calls. Hence we need a way to issue these calls for each reset. > > As we formerly had only one reset function and it was called for > initial, as well as for the clear reset, we now need a new interface. > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> > --- > target/s390x/cpu.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- > target/s390x/kvm-stub.c | 10 +++++++++- > target/s390x/kvm.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h | 4 +++- > 4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c > index bd39cb54b7..52fefa1586 100644 > --- a/target/s390x/cpu.c > +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c > @@ -131,8 +131,18 @@ static void s390_cpu_reset(CPUState *s, cpu_reset_type type) > } > > /* Reset state inside the kernel that we cannot access yet from QEMU. */ > - if (kvm_enabled() && type != S390_CPU_RESET_NORMAL) { > - kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(cpu); > + if (kvm_enabled()) { > + switch (type) { > + case S390_CPU_RESET_CLEAR: > + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_clear(cpu); > + break; > + case S390_CPU_RESET_INITIAL: > + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_initial(cpu); > + break; > + case S390_CPU_RESET_NORMAL: > + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_normal(cpu); > + break; > + } I would have assumed you only have to do that for pv? For ordinary guests we can avoid unnecessary ioctls IMHO. > } > } > > diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c b/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c > index 5152e2bdf1..c4cd497f85 100644 > --- a/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c > +++ b/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c > @@ -83,7 +83,15 @@ void kvm_s390_cmma_reset(void) > { > } > > -void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(S390CPU *cpu) > +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_initial(S390CPU *cpu) > +{ > +} > + > +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_clear(S390CPU *cpu) > +{ > +} > + > +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_normal(S390CPU *cpu) > { > } > > diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c > index b802d02ff5..5b1ed3acb4 100644 > --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c > +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c > @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ static int cap_ri; > static int cap_gs; > static int cap_hpage_1m; > static int cap_protvirt; > +static int cap_vcpu_resets; > > static int active_cmma; > > @@ -346,6 +347,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s) > cap_mem_op = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP); > cap_s390_irq = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_INJECT_IRQ); > cap_protvirt = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED); > + cap_vcpu_resets = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS); > > if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_GMAP) > || !kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) { > @@ -407,20 +409,44 @@ int kvm_arch_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cs) > return 0; > } > > -void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(S390CPU *cpu) > +static void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(S390CPU *cpu, unsigned long type) > { > CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu); > > - /* The initial reset call is needed here to reset in-kernel > - * vcpu data that we can't access directly from QEMU > - * (i.e. with older kernels which don't support sync_regs/ONE_REG). > - * Before this ioctl cpu_synchronize_state() is called in common kvm > - * code (kvm-all) */ > + /* > + * The reset call is needed here to reset in-kernel vcpu data that > + * we can't access directly from QEMU (i.e. with older kernels > + * which don't support sync_regs/ONE_REG). Before this ioctl > + * cpu_synchronize_state() is called in common kvm code > + * (kvm-all). > + */ > + if (cap_vcpu_resets) { > + if (kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET, type)) { > + error_report("CPU reset type %ld failed on CPU %i", > + type, cs->cpu_index); > + } > + return;> + } This is broken for S390_CPU_RESET_NORMAL where we don't do a KVM_S390_INITIAL_RESET for !pv ... Can't we limit that new handling to pv only and keep it out of this path? [...]
On 11/29/19 11:47 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 29.11.19 10:48, Janosch Frank wrote: >> CPU resets for protected guests need to be done via Ultravisor >> calls. Hence we need a way to issue these calls for each reset. >> >> As we formerly had only one reset function and it was called for >> initial, as well as for the clear reset, we now need a new interface. >> >> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> >> --- >> target/s390x/cpu.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- >> target/s390x/kvm-stub.c | 10 +++++++++- >> target/s390x/kvm.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >> target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h | 4 +++- >> 4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c >> index bd39cb54b7..52fefa1586 100644 >> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.c >> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c >> @@ -131,8 +131,18 @@ static void s390_cpu_reset(CPUState *s, cpu_reset_type type) >> } >> >> /* Reset state inside the kernel that we cannot access yet from QEMU. */ >> - if (kvm_enabled() && type != S390_CPU_RESET_NORMAL) { >> - kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(cpu); >> + if (kvm_enabled()) { >> + switch (type) { >> + case S390_CPU_RESET_CLEAR: >> + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_clear(cpu); >> + break; >> + case S390_CPU_RESET_INITIAL: >> + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_initial(cpu); >> + break; >> + case S390_CPU_RESET_NORMAL: >> + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_normal(cpu); >> + break; >> + } > > I would have assumed you only have to do that for pv? For ordinary > guests we can avoid unnecessary ioctls IMHO. Remember the reset normal IRQ fix in KVM? Without it we're not architecture compliant. > >> } >> } >> >> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c b/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c >> index 5152e2bdf1..c4cd497f85 100644 >> --- a/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c >> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c >> @@ -83,7 +83,15 @@ void kvm_s390_cmma_reset(void) >> { >> } >> >> -void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(S390CPU *cpu) >> +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_initial(S390CPU *cpu) >> +{ >> +} >> + >> +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_clear(S390CPU *cpu) >> +{ >> +} >> + >> +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_normal(S390CPU *cpu) >> { >> } >> >> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c >> index b802d02ff5..5b1ed3acb4 100644 >> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c >> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c >> @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ static int cap_ri; >> static int cap_gs; >> static int cap_hpage_1m; >> static int cap_protvirt; >> +static int cap_vcpu_resets; >> >> static int active_cmma; >> >> @@ -346,6 +347,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s) >> cap_mem_op = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP); >> cap_s390_irq = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_INJECT_IRQ); >> cap_protvirt = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED); >> + cap_vcpu_resets = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS); >> >> if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_GMAP) >> || !kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) { >> @@ -407,20 +409,44 @@ int kvm_arch_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cs) >> return 0; >> } >> >> -void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(S390CPU *cpu) >> +static void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(S390CPU *cpu, unsigned long type) >> { >> CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu); >> >> - /* The initial reset call is needed here to reset in-kernel >> - * vcpu data that we can't access directly from QEMU >> - * (i.e. with older kernels which don't support sync_regs/ONE_REG). >> - * Before this ioctl cpu_synchronize_state() is called in common kvm >> - * code (kvm-all) */ >> + /* >> + * The reset call is needed here to reset in-kernel vcpu data that >> + * we can't access directly from QEMU (i.e. with older kernels >> + * which don't support sync_regs/ONE_REG). Before this ioctl >> + * cpu_synchronize_state() is called in common kvm code >> + * (kvm-all). >> + */ >> + if (cap_vcpu_resets) { >> + if (kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET, type)) { >> + error_report("CPU reset type %ld failed on CPU %i", >> + type, cs->cpu_index); >> + } >> + return;> + } > > This is broken for S390_CPU_RESET_NORMAL where we don't do a > KVM_S390_INITIAL_RESET for !pv ... > > Can't we limit that new handling to pv only and keep it out of this path? Look above > > > [...] > >
On 29.11.19 12:21, Janosch Frank wrote: > On 11/29/19 11:47 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 29.11.19 10:48, Janosch Frank wrote: >>> CPU resets for protected guests need to be done via Ultravisor >>> calls. Hence we need a way to issue these calls for each reset. >>> >>> As we formerly had only one reset function and it was called for >>> initial, as well as for the clear reset, we now need a new interface. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> >>> --- >>> target/s390x/cpu.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- >>> target/s390x/kvm-stub.c | 10 +++++++++- >>> target/s390x/kvm.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >>> target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h | 4 +++- >>> 4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c >>> index bd39cb54b7..52fefa1586 100644 >>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.c >>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c >>> @@ -131,8 +131,18 @@ static void s390_cpu_reset(CPUState *s, cpu_reset_type type) >>> } >>> >>> /* Reset state inside the kernel that we cannot access yet from QEMU. */ >>> - if (kvm_enabled() && type != S390_CPU_RESET_NORMAL) { >>> - kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(cpu); >>> + if (kvm_enabled()) { >>> + switch (type) { >>> + case S390_CPU_RESET_CLEAR: >>> + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_clear(cpu); >>> + break; >>> + case S390_CPU_RESET_INITIAL: >>> + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_initial(cpu); >>> + break; >>> + case S390_CPU_RESET_NORMAL: >>> + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_normal(cpu); >>> + break; >>> + } >> >> I would have assumed you only have to do that for pv? For ordinary >> guests we can avoid unnecessary ioctls IMHO. > > Remember the reset normal IRQ fix in KVM? > Without it we're not architecture compliant. Please spell that out somewhere. People reviewing this have no idea what's going on under the hood :)
On 29/11/2019 10.48, Janosch Frank wrote: > CPU resets for protected guests need to be done via Ultravisor > calls. Hence we need a way to issue these calls for each reset. > > As we formerly had only one reset function and it was called for > initial, as well as for the clear reset, we now need a new interface. > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> > --- [...] > diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c > index b802d02ff5..5b1ed3acb4 100644 > --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c > +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c > @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ static int cap_ri; > static int cap_gs; > static int cap_hpage_1m; > static int cap_protvirt; > +static int cap_vcpu_resets; > > static int active_cmma; > > @@ -346,6 +347,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s) > cap_mem_op = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP); > cap_s390_irq = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_INJECT_IRQ); > cap_protvirt = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED); > + cap_vcpu_resets = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS); > > if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_GMAP) > || !kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) { > @@ -407,20 +409,44 @@ int kvm_arch_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cs) > return 0; > } > > -void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(S390CPU *cpu) > +static void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(S390CPU *cpu, unsigned long type) > { > CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu); > > - /* The initial reset call is needed here to reset in-kernel > - * vcpu data that we can't access directly from QEMU > - * (i.e. with older kernels which don't support sync_regs/ONE_REG). > - * Before this ioctl cpu_synchronize_state() is called in common kvm > - * code (kvm-all) */ > + /* > + * The reset call is needed here to reset in-kernel vcpu data that > + * we can't access directly from QEMU (i.e. with older kernels > + * which don't support sync_regs/ONE_REG). Before this ioctl > + * cpu_synchronize_state() is called in common kvm code > + * (kvm-all). > + */ > + if (cap_vcpu_resets) { > + if (kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET, type)) { > + error_report("CPU reset type %ld failed on CPU %i", > + type, cs->cpu_index); > + } > + return; > + } > if (kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_S390_INITIAL_RESET, NULL)) { > error_report("Initial CPU reset failed on CPU %i", cs->cpu_index); > } Don't you want to check for type != KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET_NORMAL before doing the INITIAL_RESET here? > } > > +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_initial(S390CPU *cpu) > +{ > + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(cpu, KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET_INITIAL); > +} > + > +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_clear(S390CPU *cpu) > +{ > + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(cpu, KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET_CLEAR); > +} > + > +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_normal(S390CPU *cpu) > +{ > + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(cpu, KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET_NORMAL); > +} ... otherwise this might reset more things than expected? Or do I miss something here? Thomas
On 12/4/19 12:58 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 29/11/2019 10.48, Janosch Frank wrote: >> CPU resets for protected guests need to be done via Ultravisor >> calls. Hence we need a way to issue these calls for each reset. >> >> As we formerly had only one reset function and it was called for >> initial, as well as for the clear reset, we now need a new interface. >> >> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> >> --- > [...] >> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c >> index b802d02ff5..5b1ed3acb4 100644 >> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c >> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c >> @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ static int cap_ri; >> static int cap_gs; >> static int cap_hpage_1m; >> static int cap_protvirt; >> +static int cap_vcpu_resets; >> >> static int active_cmma; >> >> @@ -346,6 +347,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s) >> cap_mem_op = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP); >> cap_s390_irq = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_INJECT_IRQ); >> cap_protvirt = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED); >> + cap_vcpu_resets = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS); >> >> if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_GMAP) >> || !kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) { >> @@ -407,20 +409,44 @@ int kvm_arch_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cs) >> return 0; >> } >> >> -void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(S390CPU *cpu) >> +static void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(S390CPU *cpu, unsigned long type) >> { >> CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu); >> >> - /* The initial reset call is needed here to reset in-kernel >> - * vcpu data that we can't access directly from QEMU >> - * (i.e. with older kernels which don't support sync_regs/ONE_REG). >> - * Before this ioctl cpu_synchronize_state() is called in common kvm >> - * code (kvm-all) */ >> + /* >> + * The reset call is needed here to reset in-kernel vcpu data that >> + * we can't access directly from QEMU (i.e. with older kernels >> + * which don't support sync_regs/ONE_REG). Before this ioctl >> + * cpu_synchronize_state() is called in common kvm code >> + * (kvm-all). >> + */ >> + if (cap_vcpu_resets) { >> + if (kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET, type)) { >> + error_report("CPU reset type %ld failed on CPU %i", >> + type, cs->cpu_index); >> + } >> + return; >> + } >> if (kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_S390_INITIAL_RESET, NULL)) { >> error_report("Initial CPU reset failed on CPU %i", cs->cpu_index); >> } > > Don't you want to check for type != KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET_NORMAL before > doing the INITIAL_RESET here? > >> } >> >> +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_initial(S390CPU *cpu) >> +{ >> + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(cpu, KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET_INITIAL); >> +} >> + >> +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_clear(S390CPU *cpu) >> +{ >> + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(cpu, KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET_CLEAR); >> +} >> + >> +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_normal(S390CPU *cpu) >> +{ >> + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(cpu, KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET_NORMAL); >> +} > > ... otherwise this might reset more things than expected? > > Or do I miss something here? Hey Thomas I split out this patch into the "architectural compliance" patch series. Have a look into there, this is an old version. > > Thomas >
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c index bd39cb54b7..52fefa1586 100644 --- a/target/s390x/cpu.c +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c @@ -131,8 +131,18 @@ static void s390_cpu_reset(CPUState *s, cpu_reset_type type) } /* Reset state inside the kernel that we cannot access yet from QEMU. */ - if (kvm_enabled() && type != S390_CPU_RESET_NORMAL) { - kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(cpu); + if (kvm_enabled()) { + switch (type) { + case S390_CPU_RESET_CLEAR: + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_clear(cpu); + break; + case S390_CPU_RESET_INITIAL: + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_initial(cpu); + break; + case S390_CPU_RESET_NORMAL: + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_normal(cpu); + break; + } } } diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c b/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c index 5152e2bdf1..c4cd497f85 100644 --- a/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c +++ b/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c @@ -83,7 +83,15 @@ void kvm_s390_cmma_reset(void) { } -void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(S390CPU *cpu) +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_initial(S390CPU *cpu) +{ +} + +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_clear(S390CPU *cpu) +{ +} + +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_normal(S390CPU *cpu) { } diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c index b802d02ff5..5b1ed3acb4 100644 --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ static int cap_ri; static int cap_gs; static int cap_hpage_1m; static int cap_protvirt; +static int cap_vcpu_resets; static int active_cmma; @@ -346,6 +347,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s) cap_mem_op = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP); cap_s390_irq = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_INJECT_IRQ); cap_protvirt = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED); + cap_vcpu_resets = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS); if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_GMAP) || !kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) { @@ -407,20 +409,44 @@ int kvm_arch_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cs) return 0; } -void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(S390CPU *cpu) +static void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(S390CPU *cpu, unsigned long type) { CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu); - /* The initial reset call is needed here to reset in-kernel - * vcpu data that we can't access directly from QEMU - * (i.e. with older kernels which don't support sync_regs/ONE_REG). - * Before this ioctl cpu_synchronize_state() is called in common kvm - * code (kvm-all) */ + /* + * The reset call is needed here to reset in-kernel vcpu data that + * we can't access directly from QEMU (i.e. with older kernels + * which don't support sync_regs/ONE_REG). Before this ioctl + * cpu_synchronize_state() is called in common kvm code + * (kvm-all). + */ + if (cap_vcpu_resets) { + if (kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET, type)) { + error_report("CPU reset type %ld failed on CPU %i", + type, cs->cpu_index); + } + return; + } if (kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_S390_INITIAL_RESET, NULL)) { error_report("Initial CPU reset failed on CPU %i", cs->cpu_index); } } +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_initial(S390CPU *cpu) +{ + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(cpu, KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET_INITIAL); +} + +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_clear(S390CPU *cpu) +{ + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(cpu, KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET_CLEAR); +} + +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_normal(S390CPU *cpu) +{ + kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(cpu, KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET_NORMAL); +} + static int can_sync_regs(CPUState *cs, int regs) { return cap_sync_regs && (cs->kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs & regs) == regs; diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h b/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h index caf985955b..0b21789796 100644 --- a/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h +++ b/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h @@ -34,7 +34,9 @@ int kvm_s390_assign_subch_ioeventfd(EventNotifier *notifier, uint32_t sch, int vq, bool assign); int kvm_s390_cmma_active(void); void kvm_s390_cmma_reset(void); -void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu(S390CPU *cpu); +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_clear(S390CPU *cpu); +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_normal(S390CPU *cpu); +void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_initial(S390CPU *cpu); int kvm_s390_set_mem_limit(uint64_t new_limit, uint64_t *hw_limit); void kvm_s390_set_max_pagesize(uint64_t pagesize, Error **errp); void kvm_s390_crypto_reset(void);
CPU resets for protected guests need to be done via Ultravisor calls. Hence we need a way to issue these calls for each reset. As we formerly had only one reset function and it was called for initial, as well as for the clear reset, we now need a new interface. Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> --- target/s390x/cpu.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- target/s390x/kvm-stub.c | 10 +++++++++- target/s390x/kvm.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h | 4 +++- 4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)