Message ID | 20191121140830.2.I68b9a92ed4def031c3f247d3b49996a2512d762d@changeid |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | Convert cros-ec-i2c-tunnel to MFD Cell | expand |
Hi Raul, On 21/11/19 22:10, Raul E Rangel wrote: > The initial patch was using the incorrect identifier. > > Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org> > --- > There are currently no boards using the identifier so it's fine to > change it. > Right, I don't see GOOG001A being used but also I don't see GOOG0012. Anyway, for the CrOS EC side, the change looks good to me. I think this will go through the I2C tree? Acked-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> Thanks, Enric > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c > index ac2412755f0a..5d91e33eb600 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c > @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id cros_ec_i2c_of_match[] = { > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cros_ec_i2c_of_match); > > static const struct acpi_device_id cros_ec_i2c_tunnel_acpi_id[] = { > - { "GOOG001A", 0 }, > + { "GOOG0012", 0 }, > { } > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, cros_ec_i2c_tunnel_acpi_id); >
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 9:23 AM Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> wrote: > > Hi Raul, > > On 21/11/19 22:10, Raul E Rangel wrote: > > The initial patch was using the incorrect identifier. > > > > Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org> > > --- > > There are currently no boards using the identifier so it's fine to > > change it. > > > > Right, I don't see GOOG001A being used but also I don't see GOOG0012. Anyway, > for the CrOS EC side, the change looks good to me. I think this will go through > the I2C tree? > Is you were curious, here is the firmware patch: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/coreboot/+/1928674
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 02:10:51PM -0700, Raul E Rangel wrote: > The initial patch was using the incorrect identifier. > > Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org> Applied to for-next, thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c index ac2412755f0a..5d91e33eb600 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id cros_ec_i2c_of_match[] = { MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cros_ec_i2c_of_match); static const struct acpi_device_id cros_ec_i2c_tunnel_acpi_id[] = { - { "GOOG001A", 0 }, + { "GOOG0012", 0 }, { } }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, cros_ec_i2c_tunnel_acpi_id);
The initial patch was using the incorrect identifier. Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org> --- There are currently no boards using the identifier so it's fine to change it. drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)