[U-Boot,v3,3/4] ARM: bcm283x: Set rpi_bcm283x_base at run-time

From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>

As part of the effort to create one binary for several bcm83x SoCs
we use the SoC compatible to decide which IO base address we use.

Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>

---

Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2:
- rename BCM2838 to BCM2711 in the correct patch
- push rpi_bcm283x_base into the .data section

 arch/arm/mach-bcm283x/Kconfig |  6 ----
 arch/arm/mach-bcm283x/init.c  | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

On 12.11.19 13:00, matthias.bgg@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>
>
> As part of the effort to create one binary for several bcm83x SoCs
> we use the SoC compatible to decide which IO base address we use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>


Is there any reason we can't just base on the ranges property of the 
/soc node instead? That way we don't duplicate the base offset all over 
the place.

Alex


>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2:
> - rename BCM2838 to BCM2711 in the correct patch
> - push rpi_bcm283x_base into the .data section
>
>   arch/arm/mach-bcm283x/Kconfig |  6 ----
>   arch/arm/mach-bcm283x/init.c  | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm283x/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-bcm283x/Kconfig
> index b08275f598..e8e0ff0eb4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm283x/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm283x/Kconfig
> @@ -202,10 +202,4 @@ config SYS_SOC
>   config SYS_CONFIG_NAME
>   	default "rpi"
>   
> -config BCM283x_BASE
> -	hex
> -	default "0x20000000" if BCM2835
> -	default "0x3f000000" if BCM2836 || BCM2837
> -	default "0xfe000000" if BCM2711
> -
>   endmenu
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm283x/init.c b/arch/arm/mach-bcm283x/init.c
> index d36017e823..d374fb60ba 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm283x/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm283x/init.c
> @@ -7,8 +7,48 @@
>    */
>   
>   #include <common.h>
> +#include <dm/device.h>
>   
> -unsigned long rpi_bcm283x_base;
> +#define PDATA_BCM2835	0
> +#define PDATA_BCM2836	1
> +#define PDATA_BCM2837	2
> +#define PDATA_BCM2711	3
> +
> +unsigned long rpi_bcm283x_base = 0x3f000000;
> +
> +struct bcm283x_pdata {
> +	unsigned long io_base;
> +};
> +
> +struct bcm283x_pdata pdata_bcm283x[] = {
> +	[PDATA_BCM2835] = {
> +		.io_base = 0x20000000,
> +	},
> +	[PDATA_BCM2836] = {
> +		.io_base = 0x3f000000,
> +	},
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> +	[PDATA_BCM2837] = {
> +		.io_base = 0x3f000000,
> +	},
> +	[PDATA_BCM2711] = {
> +		.io_base = 0xfe000000,
> +	},
> +#endif
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * I/O address space varies on different chip versions.
> + * We set the base address by inspecting the DTB.
> + */
> +static const struct udevice_id board_ids[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm2835", .data = PDATA_BCM2835},
> +	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm2836", .data = PDATA_BCM2836},
> +	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm2837", .data = PDATA_BCM2837},
> +	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm2838", .data = PDATA_BCM2711},
> +	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm2711", .data = PDATA_BCM2711},
> +	{ },
> +};
>   
>   int arch_cpu_init(void)
>   {
> @@ -19,10 +59,28 @@ int arch_cpu_init(void)
>   
>   int mach_cpu_init(void)
>   {
> -	rpi_bcm283x_base = CONFIG_BCM283x_BASE;
> +	const struct udevice_id *of_match = board_ids;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	rpi_bcm283x_base = 0;
> +
> +	while (of_match->compatible) {
> +		struct bcm283x_pdata pdat;
> +
> +		ret = fdt_node_check_compatible(gd->fdt_blob, 0,
> +						of_match->compatible);
> +		if (!ret) {
> +			pdat = pdata_bcm283x[of_match->data];
> +			rpi_bcm283x_base = pdat.io_base;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		of_match++;
> +	}
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> +
>   #ifdef CONFIG_ARMV7_LPAE
>   void enable_caches(void)
>   {