| Message ID | 1563985835-12013-1-git-send-email-frank.heimes@canonical.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Enhanced CPU-MF hardware counters - kernel part (LP: 1836860) | expand |
On 7/24/19 9:30 AM, frank.heimes@canonical.com wrote: > Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836860 > > SRU Justification: > > [Impact] > > * Enhanced CPU-MF hardware counters - fix lack of support of new hardware > > [Fix] > > * 46a984ffb86c8542fa510656fa8cb33befe8ee8f 46a984ff "s390/cpum_cf: Add support for CPU-MF SVN 6" > > * 820bace734722715c643dcb5f74b502cb912d4eb 820bace "s390/cpumf: Add extended counter set definitions for model 8561 and 8562" > > [Test Case] > > * try CPU-Measurement Facility counter on z14 and next generation hardware - only IBM can do that now > > [Regression Potential] > > * The regression potential can be considered as low since these changes are limited to arch/s390 > > * do only touch perf_* code > > * and mainly add code (rather than modify or remove) > > [Other Info] > > * first commit is taken from 5.2, second from 5.3-rc1 > > Thomas Richter (2): > From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> > From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> > > arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c | 15 +++-- > arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf_events.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > Acked-by: Connor Kuehl <connor.kuehl@canonical.com>
On 24.07.19 18:30, frank.heimes@canonical.com wrote: > Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836860 > > SRU Justification: > > [Impact] > > * Enhanced CPU-MF hardware counters - fix lack of support of new hardware > > [Fix] > > * 46a984ffb86c8542fa510656fa8cb33befe8ee8f 46a984ff "s390/cpum_cf: Add support for CPU-MF SVN 6" > > * 820bace734722715c643dcb5f74b502cb912d4eb 820bace "s390/cpumf: Add extended counter set definitions for model 8561 and 8562" > > [Test Case] > > * try CPU-Measurement Facility counter on z14 and next generation hardware - only IBM can do that now > > [Regression Potential] > > * The regression potential can be considered as low since these changes are limited to arch/s390 > > * do only touch perf_* code > > * and mainly add code (rather than modify or remove) > > [Other Info] > > * first commit is taken from 5.2, second from 5.3-rc1 > > Thomas Richter (2): > From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> > From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> > > arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c | 15 +++-- > arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf_events.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > The series you request, nominate for you should. Acked-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
On 2019-07-24 18:30:33 , frank.heimes@canonical.com wrote: > Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836860 > > SRU Justification: > > [Impact] > > * Enhanced CPU-MF hardware counters - fix lack of support of new hardware > > [Fix] > > * 46a984ffb86c8542fa510656fa8cb33befe8ee8f 46a984ff "s390/cpum_cf: Add support for CPU-MF SVN 6" > > * 820bace734722715c643dcb5f74b502cb912d4eb 820bace "s390/cpumf: Add extended counter set definitions for model 8561 and 8562" > > [Test Case] > > * try CPU-Measurement Facility counter on z14 and next generation hardware - only IBM can do that now > > [Regression Potential] > > * The regression potential can be considered as low since these changes are limited to arch/s390 > > * do only touch perf_* code > > * and mainly add code (rather than modify or remove) > > [Other Info] > > * first commit is taken from 5.2, second from 5.3-rc1 > > Thomas Richter (2): > From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> > From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> > > arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c | 15 +++-- > arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf_events.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.7.4 > > > -- > kernel-team mailing list > kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team