| Message ID | 20190718213001.24815-1-olteanv@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | NXP LS1021A-TSN Board | expand |
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 4:33 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote: > > This patchset adds initial support for the NXP LS1021A-TSN board, > an evaluation platform built in partnership with VVDN/Argonboards > for some IEEE 802.1 TSN features. > > It features a cleaned-up U-Boot board support taken from OpenIL, > as well as an eTSEC migration to DM_ETH. I picked up Bin Meng's > patch that converts the LS1021A-TWR (different board, same SoC): > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2018-May/330096.html > verified it on the LS1021A-TSN board I am submitting, and made a > few adjustments where necessary. > > TODO items: > - Make the eTSEC driver support fixed-link interfaces (necessary > for the enet2 <-> sja1105 internal port) > - Add driver for SJA1105 switch > - Potentially migrate the eTSEC MDIO bus driver to DM_MDIO and > expose the TBI PHY to mdio commands (useful for debugging), > once https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-June/371563.html > is merged. This series is merged at this point... are you wanting to do that migration now or do it sometime later? > > Bin Meng (1): > arm: ls1021atwr: Convert to use driver model TSEC driver > > Jianchao Wang (1): > Add support for the NXP LS1021A-TSN board > > Vladimir Oltean (7): > net: tsec: Refactor the readout of the tbi-handle property > net: tsec: Fix offset of MDIO registers for DM_ETH > net: tsec: Reverse Christmas tree notation > net: tsec: Make errors visible > net: tsec: Common handling of MAC station address for DM_ETH > net: tsec: Change compatible strings to match Linux > configs: ls1021atwr: Fix distro_bootcmd for QSPI boot > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 14 + > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/cpu.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/fdt.c | 10 + > arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 2 +- > arch/arm/dts/ls1021a-tsn.dts | 77 ++++++ > arch/arm/dts/ls1021a-twr.dtsi | 32 +++ > arch/arm/dts/ls1021a.dtsi | 30 +- > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Kconfig | 18 ++ > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/MAINTAINERS | 8 + > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Makefile | 3 + > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/README.rst | 97 +++++++ > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls1021atsn.c | 260 ++++++++++++++++++ > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_pbi.cfg | 15 + > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_rcw_sd.cfg | 8 + > board/freescale/ls1021atwr/ls1021atwr.c | 38 --- > configs/ls1021atsn_qspi_defconfig | 79 ++++++ > configs/ls1021atsn_sdcard_defconfig | 91 ++++++ > configs/ls1021atwr_nor_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig | 2 + > configs/ls1021atwr_nor_defconfig | 2 + > configs/ls1021atwr_nor_lpuart_defconfig | 2 + > configs/ls1021atwr_qspi_defconfig | 2 + > ...s1021atwr_sdcard_ifc_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig | 2 + > configs/ls1021atwr_sdcard_ifc_defconfig | 2 + > configs/ls1021atwr_sdcard_qspi_defconfig | 2 + > doc/device-tree-bindings/net/fsl-tsec-phy.txt | 4 +- > drivers/net/tsec.c | 59 ++-- > include/configs/ls1021atsn.h | 250 +++++++++++++++++ > include/configs/ls1021atwr.h | 30 +- > include/tsec.h | 4 +- > 29 files changed, 1038 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/ls1021a-tsn.dts > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Kconfig > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/MAINTAINERS > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Makefile > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/README.rst > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls1021atsn.c > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_pbi.cfg > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_rcw_sd.cfg > create mode 100644 configs/ls1021atsn_qspi_defconfig > create mode 100644 configs/ls1021atsn_sdcard_defconfig > create mode 100644 include/configs/ls1021atsn.h > > -- > 2.17.1 > > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
Hi Joe, On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 03:15, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 4:33 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This patchset adds initial support for the NXP LS1021A-TSN board, > > an evaluation platform built in partnership with VVDN/Argonboards > > for some IEEE 802.1 TSN features. > > > > It features a cleaned-up U-Boot board support taken from OpenIL, > > as well as an eTSEC migration to DM_ETH. I picked up Bin Meng's > > patch that converts the LS1021A-TWR (different board, same SoC): > > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2018-May/330096.html > > verified it on the LS1021A-TSN board I am submitting, and made a > > few adjustments where necessary. > > > > TODO items: > > - Make the eTSEC driver support fixed-link interfaces (necessary > > for the enet2 <-> sja1105 internal port) > > - Add driver for SJA1105 switch > > - Potentially migrate the eTSEC MDIO bus driver to DM_MDIO and > > expose the TBI PHY to mdio commands (useful for debugging), > > once https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-June/371563.html > > is merged. > > This series is merged at this point... are you wanting to do that > migration now or do it sometime later? > I think I would rather have these 9 patches merged first, now that they got reviewed, instead of reworking them again. > > > > Bin Meng (1): > > arm: ls1021atwr: Convert to use driver model TSEC driver > > > > Jianchao Wang (1): > > Add support for the NXP LS1021A-TSN board > > > > Vladimir Oltean (7): > > net: tsec: Refactor the readout of the tbi-handle property > > net: tsec: Fix offset of MDIO registers for DM_ETH > > net: tsec: Reverse Christmas tree notation > > net: tsec: Make errors visible > > net: tsec: Common handling of MAC station address for DM_ETH > > net: tsec: Change compatible strings to match Linux > > configs: ls1021atwr: Fix distro_bootcmd for QSPI boot > > > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 14 + > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/cpu.c | 2 +- > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/fdt.c | 10 + > > arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 2 +- > > arch/arm/dts/ls1021a-tsn.dts | 77 ++++++ > > arch/arm/dts/ls1021a-twr.dtsi | 32 +++ > > arch/arm/dts/ls1021a.dtsi | 30 +- > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Kconfig | 18 ++ > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/MAINTAINERS | 8 + > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Makefile | 3 + > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/README.rst | 97 +++++++ > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls1021atsn.c | 260 ++++++++++++++++++ > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_pbi.cfg | 15 + > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_rcw_sd.cfg | 8 + > > board/freescale/ls1021atwr/ls1021atwr.c | 38 --- > > configs/ls1021atsn_qspi_defconfig | 79 ++++++ > > configs/ls1021atsn_sdcard_defconfig | 91 ++++++ > > configs/ls1021atwr_nor_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig | 2 + > > configs/ls1021atwr_nor_defconfig | 2 + > > configs/ls1021atwr_nor_lpuart_defconfig | 2 + > > configs/ls1021atwr_qspi_defconfig | 2 + > > ...s1021atwr_sdcard_ifc_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig | 2 + > > configs/ls1021atwr_sdcard_ifc_defconfig | 2 + > > configs/ls1021atwr_sdcard_qspi_defconfig | 2 + > > doc/device-tree-bindings/net/fsl-tsec-phy.txt | 4 +- > > drivers/net/tsec.c | 59 ++-- > > include/configs/ls1021atsn.h | 250 +++++++++++++++++ > > include/configs/ls1021atwr.h | 30 +- > > include/tsec.h | 4 +- > > 29 files changed, 1038 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/ls1021a-tsn.dts > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Kconfig > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/MAINTAINERS > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Makefile > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/README.rst > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls1021atsn.c > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_pbi.cfg > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_rcw_sd.cfg > > create mode 100644 configs/ls1021atsn_qspi_defconfig > > create mode 100644 configs/ls1021atsn_sdcard_defconfig > > create mode 100644 include/configs/ls1021atsn.h > > > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > U-Boot mailing list > > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot Regards, -Vladimir
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:08 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 03:15, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 4:33 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > This patchset adds initial support for the NXP LS1021A-TSN board, > > > an evaluation platform built in partnership with VVDN/Argonboards > > > for some IEEE 802.1 TSN features. > > > > > > It features a cleaned-up U-Boot board support taken from OpenIL, > > > as well as an eTSEC migration to DM_ETH. I picked up Bin Meng's > > > patch that converts the LS1021A-TWR (different board, same SoC): > > > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2018-May/330096.html > > > verified it on the LS1021A-TSN board I am submitting, and made a > > > few adjustments where necessary. > > > > > > TODO items: > > > - Make the eTSEC driver support fixed-link interfaces (necessary > > > for the enet2 <-> sja1105 internal port) > > > - Add driver for SJA1105 switch > > > - Potentially migrate the eTSEC MDIO bus driver to DM_MDIO and > > > expose the TBI PHY to mdio commands (useful for debugging), > > > once https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-June/371563.html > > > is merged. > > > > This series is merged at this point... are you wanting to do that > > migration now or do it sometime later? > > > > I think I would rather have these 9 patches merged first, now that > they got reviewed, instead of reworking them again. Sounds good. Thanks, -Joe > > > > > > > Bin Meng (1): > > > arm: ls1021atwr: Convert to use driver model TSEC driver > > > > > > Jianchao Wang (1): > > > Add support for the NXP LS1021A-TSN board > > > > > > Vladimir Oltean (7): > > > net: tsec: Refactor the readout of the tbi-handle property > > > net: tsec: Fix offset of MDIO registers for DM_ETH > > > net: tsec: Reverse Christmas tree notation > > > net: tsec: Make errors visible > > > net: tsec: Common handling of MAC station address for DM_ETH > > > net: tsec: Change compatible strings to match Linux > > > configs: ls1021atwr: Fix distro_bootcmd for QSPI boot > > > > > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 14 + > > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/cpu.c | 2 +- > > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/fdt.c | 10 + > > > arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 2 +- > > > arch/arm/dts/ls1021a-tsn.dts | 77 ++++++ > > > arch/arm/dts/ls1021a-twr.dtsi | 32 +++ > > > arch/arm/dts/ls1021a.dtsi | 30 +- > > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Kconfig | 18 ++ > > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/MAINTAINERS | 8 + > > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Makefile | 3 + > > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/README.rst | 97 +++++++ > > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls1021atsn.c | 260 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_pbi.cfg | 15 + > > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_rcw_sd.cfg | 8 + > > > board/freescale/ls1021atwr/ls1021atwr.c | 38 --- > > > configs/ls1021atsn_qspi_defconfig | 79 ++++++ > > > configs/ls1021atsn_sdcard_defconfig | 91 ++++++ > > > configs/ls1021atwr_nor_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig | 2 + > > > configs/ls1021atwr_nor_defconfig | 2 + > > > configs/ls1021atwr_nor_lpuart_defconfig | 2 + > > > configs/ls1021atwr_qspi_defconfig | 2 + > > > ...s1021atwr_sdcard_ifc_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig | 2 + > > > configs/ls1021atwr_sdcard_ifc_defconfig | 2 + > > > configs/ls1021atwr_sdcard_qspi_defconfig | 2 + > > > doc/device-tree-bindings/net/fsl-tsec-phy.txt | 4 +- > > > drivers/net/tsec.c | 59 ++-- > > > include/configs/ls1021atsn.h | 250 +++++++++++++++++ > > > include/configs/ls1021atwr.h | 30 +- > > > include/tsec.h | 4 +- > > > 29 files changed, 1038 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/ls1021a-tsn.dts > > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Kconfig > > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/MAINTAINERS > > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Makefile > > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/README.rst > > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls1021atsn.c > > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_pbi.cfg > > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_rcw_sd.cfg > > > create mode 100644 configs/ls1021atsn_qspi_defconfig > > > create mode 100644 configs/ls1021atsn_sdcard_defconfig > > > create mode 100644 include/configs/ls1021atsn.h > > > > > > -- > > > 2.17.1 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > U-Boot mailing list > > > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > > > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot > > Regards, > -Vladimir > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 10:38, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:08 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Joe, > > > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 03:15, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 4:33 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > This patchset adds initial support for the NXP LS1021A-TSN board, > > > > an evaluation platform built in partnership with VVDN/Argonboards > > > > for some IEEE 802.1 TSN features. > > > > > > > > It features a cleaned-up U-Boot board support taken from OpenIL, > > > > as well as an eTSEC migration to DM_ETH. I picked up Bin Meng's > > > > patch that converts the LS1021A-TWR (different board, same SoC): > > > > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2018-May/330096.html > > > > verified it on the LS1021A-TSN board I am submitting, and made a > > > > few adjustments where necessary. > > > > > > > > TODO items: > > > > - Make the eTSEC driver support fixed-link interfaces (necessary > > > > for the enet2 <-> sja1105 internal port) > > > > - Add driver for SJA1105 switch > > > > - Potentially migrate the eTSEC MDIO bus driver to DM_MDIO and > > > > expose the TBI PHY to mdio commands (useful for debugging), > > > > once https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-June/371563.html > > > > is merged. > > > > > > This series is merged at this point... are you wanting to do that > > > migration now or do it sometime later? > > > > > > > I think I would rather have these 9 patches merged first, now that > > they got reviewed, instead of reworking them again. > > Sounds good. > Thanks, > -Joe > What does this mean, that we are waiting for Prabhakar's OK? Is the patchset going to get in through a single tree? Whose is it going to be? Thanks, -Vladimir > > > > > > > > > > Bin Meng (1): > > > > arm: ls1021atwr: Convert to use driver model TSEC driver > > > > > > > > Jianchao Wang (1): > > > > Add support for the NXP LS1021A-TSN board > > > > > > > > Vladimir Oltean (7): > > > > net: tsec: Refactor the readout of the tbi-handle property > > > > net: tsec: Fix offset of MDIO registers for DM_ETH > > > > net: tsec: Reverse Christmas tree notation > > > > net: tsec: Make errors visible > > > > net: tsec: Common handling of MAC station address for DM_ETH > > > > net: tsec: Change compatible strings to match Linux > > > > configs: ls1021atwr: Fix distro_bootcmd for QSPI boot > > > > > > > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 14 + > > > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/cpu.c | 2 +- > > > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/fdt.c | 10 + > > > > arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 2 +- > > > > arch/arm/dts/ls1021a-tsn.dts | 77 ++++++ > > > > arch/arm/dts/ls1021a-twr.dtsi | 32 +++ > > > > arch/arm/dts/ls1021a.dtsi | 30 +- > > > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Kconfig | 18 ++ > > > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/MAINTAINERS | 8 + > > > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Makefile | 3 + > > > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/README.rst | 97 +++++++ > > > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls1021atsn.c | 260 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_pbi.cfg | 15 + > > > > board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_rcw_sd.cfg | 8 + > > > > board/freescale/ls1021atwr/ls1021atwr.c | 38 --- > > > > configs/ls1021atsn_qspi_defconfig | 79 ++++++ > > > > configs/ls1021atsn_sdcard_defconfig | 91 ++++++ > > > > configs/ls1021atwr_nor_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig | 2 + > > > > configs/ls1021atwr_nor_defconfig | 2 + > > > > configs/ls1021atwr_nor_lpuart_defconfig | 2 + > > > > configs/ls1021atwr_qspi_defconfig | 2 + > > > > ...s1021atwr_sdcard_ifc_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig | 2 + > > > > configs/ls1021atwr_sdcard_ifc_defconfig | 2 + > > > > configs/ls1021atwr_sdcard_qspi_defconfig | 2 + > > > > doc/device-tree-bindings/net/fsl-tsec-phy.txt | 4 +- > > > > drivers/net/tsec.c | 59 ++-- > > > > include/configs/ls1021atsn.h | 250 +++++++++++++++++ > > > > include/configs/ls1021atwr.h | 30 +- > > > > include/tsec.h | 4 +- > > > > 29 files changed, 1038 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-) > > > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/ls1021a-tsn.dts > > > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Kconfig > > > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/MAINTAINERS > > > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/Makefile > > > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/README.rst > > > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls1021atsn.c > > > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_pbi.cfg > > > > create mode 100644 board/freescale/ls1021atsn/ls102xa_rcw_sd.cfg > > > > create mode 100644 configs/ls1021atsn_qspi_defconfig > > > > create mode 100644 configs/ls1021atsn_sdcard_defconfig > > > > create mode 100644 include/configs/ls1021atsn.h > > > > > > > > -- > > > > 2.17.1 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > U-Boot mailing list > > > > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > > > > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot > > > > Regards, > > -Vladimir > > _______________________________________________ > > U-Boot mailing list > > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:38 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 10:38, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:08 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Joe, > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 03:15, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 4:33 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This patchset adds initial support for the NXP LS1021A-TSN board, > > > > > an evaluation platform built in partnership with VVDN/Argonboards > > > > > for some IEEE 802.1 TSN features. > > > > > > > > > > It features a cleaned-up U-Boot board support taken from OpenIL, > > > > > as well as an eTSEC migration to DM_ETH. I picked up Bin Meng's > > > > > patch that converts the LS1021A-TWR (different board, same SoC): > > > > > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2018-May/330096.html > > > > > verified it on the LS1021A-TSN board I am submitting, and made a > > > > > few adjustments where necessary. > > > > > > > > > > TODO items: > > > > > - Make the eTSEC driver support fixed-link interfaces (necessary > > > > > for the enet2 <-> sja1105 internal port) > > > > > - Add driver for SJA1105 switch > > > > > - Potentially migrate the eTSEC MDIO bus driver to DM_MDIO and > > > > > expose the TBI PHY to mdio commands (useful for debugging), > > > > > once https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-June/371563.html > > > > > is merged. > > > > > > > > This series is merged at this point... are you wanting to do that > > > > migration now or do it sometime later? > > > > > > > > > > I think I would rather have these 9 patches merged first, now that > > > they got reviewed, instead of reworking them again. > > > > Sounds good. > > Thanks, > > -Joe > > > > What does this mean, that we are waiting for Prabhakar's OK? Is the > patchset going to get in through a single tree? Whose is it going to > be? Since the vast majority of the series is the Ethernet changes, I was planning to take it. Thanks, -Joe
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 21:56, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:38 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 10:38, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:08 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Joe, > > > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 03:15, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 4:33 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > This patchset adds initial support for the NXP LS1021A-TSN board, > > > > > > an evaluation platform built in partnership with VVDN/Argonboards > > > > > > for some IEEE 802.1 TSN features. > > > > > > > > > > > > It features a cleaned-up U-Boot board support taken from OpenIL, > > > > > > as well as an eTSEC migration to DM_ETH. I picked up Bin Meng's > > > > > > patch that converts the LS1021A-TWR (different board, same SoC): > > > > > > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2018-May/330096.html > > > > > > verified it on the LS1021A-TSN board I am submitting, and made a > > > > > > few adjustments where necessary. > > > > > > > > > > > > TODO items: > > > > > > - Make the eTSEC driver support fixed-link interfaces (necessary > > > > > > for the enet2 <-> sja1105 internal port) > > > > > > - Add driver for SJA1105 switch > > > > > > - Potentially migrate the eTSEC MDIO bus driver to DM_MDIO and > > > > > > expose the TBI PHY to mdio commands (useful for debugging), > > > > > > once https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-June/371563.html > > > > > > is merged. > > > > > > > > > > This series is merged at this point... are you wanting to do that > > > > > migration now or do it sometime later? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I would rather have these 9 patches merged first, now that > > > > they got reviewed, instead of reworking them again. > > > > > > Sounds good. > > > Thanks, > > > -Joe > > > > > > > What does this mean, that we are waiting for Prabhakar's OK? Is the > > patchset going to get in through a single tree? Whose is it going to > > be? > > Since the vast majority of the series is the Ethernet changes, I was > planning to take it. > Sounds reasonable to me. > Thanks, > -Joe Regards, -Vladimir
Dear Joe, > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com> > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 12:26 AM > To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> > Cc: Joseph Hershberger <joseph.hershberger@ni.com>; Prabhakar > Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>; u-boot <u- > boot@lists.denx.de>; Joseph Hershberger <joseph.hershberger@ni.com> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] NXP LS1021A-TSN Board > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:38 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 10:38, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:08 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Joe, > > > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 03:15, Joe Hershberger > <joe.hershberger@ni.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 4:33 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > This patchset adds initial support for the NXP LS1021A-TSN > > > > > > board, an evaluation platform built in partnership with > > > > > > VVDN/Argonboards for some IEEE 802.1 TSN features. > > > > > > > > > > > > It features a cleaned-up U-Boot board support taken from > > > > > > OpenIL, as well as an eTSEC migration to DM_ETH. I picked up > > > > > > Bin Meng's patch that converts the LS1021A-TWR (different board, > same SoC): > > > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2 > > > > > > F%2Flists.denx.de%2Fpipermail%2Fu-boot%2F2018- > May%2F330096.htm > > > > > > > l&data=02%7C01%7Cprabhakar.kushwaha%40nxp.com%7Cb56d806fd1 > > > > > > > d34b1e9f6e08d710689b30%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0% > > > > > > > 7C0%7C636995913790933089&sdata=p3knnJglauV7ddeHwXZqFHJTTVk > > > > > > vgIPINUzuVkH6e%2Fw%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > verified it on the LS1021A-TSN board I am submitting, and made > > > > > > a few adjustments where necessary. > > > > > > > > > > > > TODO items: > > > > > > - Make the eTSEC driver support fixed-link interfaces (necessary > > > > > > for the enet2 <-> sja1105 internal port) > > > > > > - Add driver for SJA1105 switch > > > > > > - Potentially migrate the eTSEC MDIO bus driver to DM_MDIO and > > > > > > expose the TBI PHY to mdio commands (useful for debugging), > > > > > > once > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.d > enx.de%2Fpipermail%2Fu-boot%2F2019- > June%2F371563.html&data=02%7C01%7Cprabhakar.kushwaha%40nxp.c > om%7Cb56d806fd1d34b1e9f6e08d710689b30%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c > 5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636995913790933089&sdata=dRUz6o%2FbaaRV > Fy%2FTn4Qxx%2B%2Bbng2YmxMVWtUyknP2qHY%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > is merged. > > > > > > > > > > This series is merged at this point... are you wanting to do > > > > > that migration now or do it sometime later? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I would rather have these 9 patches merged first, now that > > > > they got reviewed, instead of reworking them again. > > > > > > Sounds good. > > > Thanks, > > > -Joe > > > > > > > What does this mean, that we are waiting for Prabhakar's OK? Is the > > patchset going to get in through a single tree? Whose is it going to > > be? > > Since the vast majority of the series is the Ethernet changes, I was planning > to take it. > I hope you have taken this patch-set --pk
Hi Prabhakar, On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 12:37, Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com> wrote: > > Dear Joe, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com> > > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 12:26 AM > > To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> > > Cc: Joseph Hershberger <joseph.hershberger@ni.com>; Prabhakar > > Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>; u-boot <u- > > boot@lists.denx.de>; Joseph Hershberger <joseph.hershberger@ni.com> > > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] NXP LS1021A-TSN Board > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:38 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 10:38, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:08 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Joe, > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 03:15, Joe Hershberger > > <joe.hershberger@ni.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 4:33 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patchset adds initial support for the NXP LS1021A-TSN > > > > > > > board, an evaluation platform built in partnership with > > > > > > > VVDN/Argonboards for some IEEE 802.1 TSN features. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It features a cleaned-up U-Boot board support taken from > > > > > > > OpenIL, as well as an eTSEC migration to DM_ETH. I picked up > > > > > > > Bin Meng's patch that converts the LS1021A-TWR (different board, > > same SoC): > > > > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2 > > > > > > > F%2Flists.denx.de%2Fpipermail%2Fu-boot%2F2018- > > May%2F330096.htm > > > > > > > > > l&data=02%7C01%7Cprabhakar.kushwaha%40nxp.com%7Cb56d806fd1 > > > > > > > > > d34b1e9f6e08d710689b30%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0% > > > > > > > > > 7C0%7C636995913790933089&sdata=p3knnJglauV7ddeHwXZqFHJTTVk > > > > > > > vgIPINUzuVkH6e%2Fw%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > verified it on the LS1021A-TSN board I am submitting, and made > > > > > > > a few adjustments where necessary. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TODO items: > > > > > > > - Make the eTSEC driver support fixed-link interfaces (necessary > > > > > > > for the enet2 <-> sja1105 internal port) > > > > > > > - Add driver for SJA1105 switch > > > > > > > - Potentially migrate the eTSEC MDIO bus driver to DM_MDIO and > > > > > > > expose the TBI PHY to mdio commands (useful for debugging), > > > > > > > once > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.d > > enx.de%2Fpipermail%2Fu-boot%2F2019- > > June%2F371563.html&data=02%7C01%7Cprabhakar.kushwaha%40nxp.c > > om%7Cb56d806fd1d34b1e9f6e08d710689b30%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c > > 5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636995913790933089&sdata=dRUz6o%2FbaaRV > > Fy%2FTn4Qxx%2B%2Bbng2YmxMVWtUyknP2qHY%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > is merged. > > > > > > > > > > > > This series is merged at this point... are you wanting to do > > > > > > that migration now or do it sometime later? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I would rather have these 9 patches merged first, now that > > > > > they got reviewed, instead of reworking them again. > > > > > > > > Sounds good. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Joe > > > > > > > > > > What does this mean, that we are waiting for Prabhakar's OK? Is the > > > patchset going to get in through a single tree? Whose is it going to > > > be? > > > > Since the vast majority of the series is the Ethernet changes, I was planning > > to take it. > > > > I hope you have taken this patch-set Yes, they are now applied to the u-boot-net tree: https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-net/commits/master > > --pk > > Thanks! -Vladimir