@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
int fixup_sk_storage_map[MAX_FIXUPS];
const char *errstr;
const char *errstr_unpriv;
- uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv, insn_processed;
+ uint32_t insn_processed;
int prog_len;
enum {
UNDEF,
@@ -95,16 +95,20 @@ struct bpf_test {
} result, result_unpriv;
enum bpf_prog_type prog_type;
uint8_t flags;
- __u8 data[TEST_DATA_LEN];
void (*fill_helper)(struct bpf_test *self);
uint8_t runs;
- struct {
- uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv;
- union {
- __u8 data[TEST_DATA_LEN];
- __u64 data64[TEST_DATA_LEN / 8];
- };
- } retvals[MAX_TEST_RUNS];
+#define bpf_testdata_struct_t \
+ struct { \
+ uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv; \
+ union { \
+ __u8 data[TEST_DATA_LEN]; \
+ __u64 data64[TEST_DATA_LEN / 8]; \
+ }; \
+ }
+ union {
+ bpf_testdata_struct_t;
+ bpf_testdata_struct_t retvals[MAX_TEST_RUNS];
+ };
enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
};
@@ -949,17 +953,8 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
uint32_t expected_val;
int i;
- if (!test->runs) {
- expected_val = unpriv && test->retval_unpriv ?
- test->retval_unpriv : test->retval;
-
- err = do_prog_test_run(fd_prog, unpriv, expected_val,
- test->data, sizeof(test->data));
- if (err)
- run_errs++;
- else
- run_successes++;
- }
+ if (!test->runs)
+ test->runs = 1;
for (i = 0; i < test->runs; i++) {
if (unpriv && test->retvals[i].retval_unpriv)
test_verifier tests can specify single- and multi-runs tests. Internally logic of handling them is duplicated. Get rid of it by making single run retval/data specification to be a first run spec. Cc: Krzesimir Nowak <krzesimir@kinvolk.io> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 35 +++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)