diff mbox

Fix typo in code and comments

Message ID 1303806576-10286-1-git-send-email-weil@mail.berlios.de
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

Stefan Weil April 26, 2011, 8:29 a.m. UTC 
Replace writeable -> writable

Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
---
 block.c                      |    2 +-
 block/sheepdog.c             |    4 +-
 hw/eepro100.c                |    2 +-
 hw/eeprom93xx.c              |   10 ++++----
 hw/msi.c                     |    2 +-
 hw/msix.c                    |    2 +-
 hw/pci.c                     |    6 ++--
 hw/pci.h                     |    2 +-
 hw/rtl8139.c                 |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 hw/sun4m_iommu.c             |    2 +-
 target-mips/translate_init.c |    2 +-
 11 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

Comments

Stefan Hajnoczi April 26, 2011, 9:25 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de> wrote:
> Replace writeable -> writable

Why make this change?  writeable and writable are both commonly used spellings.

Stefan
Jan Marten Simons April 26, 2011, 5:04 p.m. UTC | #2 
Am Dienstag 26 April 2011 11:25:58 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de> wrote:
> > Replace writeable -> writable
> 
> Why make this change?  writeable and writable are both commonly used
> spellings.

It seems like "writeable" is the commonly used term in computer sciences and 
"writable" is the normal english adjective formed from "to write" + "-able" in 
general English.[1]

As we are refering to computer science related "writeable" it should be left 
as is imho. But as I'm no native speaker, you might feel different on this.
On a side note: Samba offers both spellings as valid for thier configuration 
files. [2]

[1] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/writeable
[2] http://forums.contribs.org/index.php?topic=22258.0

With regards,

 Dipl. Phys.
  Jan M. Simons
 
Institute of Crystallography
RWTH Aachen University
Stefan Weil April 26, 2011, 5:26 p.m. UTC | #3 
Am 26.04.2011 19:04, schrieb Jan Marten Simons:
> Am Dienstag 26 April 2011 11:25:58 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de> 
>> wrote:
>>> Replace writeable -> writable
>>
>> Why make this change? writeable and writable are both commonly used
>> spellings.
>
> It seems like "writeable" is the commonly used term in computer 
> sciences and
> "writable" is the normal english adjective formed from "to write" + 
> "-able" in
> general English.[1]
>
> As we are refering to computer science related "writeable" it should 
> be left
> as is imho. But as I'm no native speaker, you might feel different on 
> this.
> On a side note: Samba offers both spellings as valid for thier 
> configuration
> files. [2]
>
> [1] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/writeable
> [2] http://forums.contribs.org/index.php?topic=22258.0
>
> With regards,
>
> Dipl. Phys.
> Jan M. Simons
>
> Institute of Crystallography
> RWTH Aachen University

Commonly used is not necessarily correct.

The Oxford dictionary only accepts writable (even when I select
american english). Same result with Merriam-Webster.
Google suggests writable instead of writeable.

I see "writeable" only in computer programs and related contexts,
therefore I assume that it is simply a very common spelling error
contributed by non-native speakers (like myself). Interesting
detail: The spelling checker of my mailing client (Icedove) marks
writeable as correct and writable as wrong (which is obviously wrong).
Maybe I should send a bug report to Debian.

The ratio of writeable:writable in unpatched qemu is 37:47.
Even if both writings were correct, I might argue that a
uniform spelling is better and choose the form which is more commonly
used.

Let's improve the spelling for computer programs a little bit!
Stefan Weil April 26, 2011, 8:58 p.m. UTC | #4 
Am 26.04.2011 19:26, schrieb Stefan Weil:
> Am 26.04.2011 19:04, schrieb Jan Marten Simons:
>> Am Dienstag 26 April 2011 11:25:58 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Replace writeable -> writable
>>>
>>> Why make this change? writeable and writable are both commonly used
>>> spellings.
>>
>> It seems like "writeable" is the commonly used term in computer 
>> sciences and
>> "writable" is the normal english adjective formed from "to write" + 
>> "-able" in
>> general English.[1]
>>
>> As we are refering to computer science related "writeable" it should 
>> be left
>> as is imho. But as I'm no native speaker, you might feel different on 
>> this.
>> On a side note: Samba offers both spellings as valid for thier 
>> configuration
>> files. [2]
>>
>> [1] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/writeable
>> [2] http://forums.contribs.org/index.php?topic=22258.0
>>
>> With regards,
>>
>> Dipl. Phys.
>> Jan M. Simons
>>
>> Institute of Crystallography
>> RWTH Aachen University
>
> Commonly used is not necessarily correct.
>
> The Oxford dictionary only accepts writable (even when I select
> american english). Same result with Merriam-Webster.
> Google suggests writable instead of writeable.
>
> I see "writeable" only in computer programs and related contexts,
> therefore I assume that it is simply a very common spelling error
> contributed by non-native speakers (like myself). Interesting
> detail: The spelling checker of my mailing client (Icedove) marks
> writeable as correct and writable as wrong (which is obviously wrong).
> Maybe I should send a bug report to Debian.
>
> The ratio of writeable:writable in unpatched qemu is 37:47.
> Even if both writings were correct, I might argue that a
> uniform spelling is better and choose the form which is more commonly
> used.
>
> Let's improve the spelling for computer programs a little bit!


Debian's myspell-en-gb is wrong, so I just sent a bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624249

Several other spelling lists included in Debian are correct, e.g.
hunspell-en-us, iamerican, ibritish, aspell-en.

Here is a list from a native (american) speaker with common
spelling bugs: http://marvin.cs.uidaho.edu/misspell.html
It also includes "writeable".

Cheers,
Stefan W.
Peter Maydell April 26, 2011, 10:07 p.m. UTC | #5 
On 26 April 2011 18:26, Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de> wrote:
> The Oxford dictionary only accepts writable (even when I select
> american english). Same result with Merriam-Webster.
> Google suggests writable instead of writeable.

For what it's worth, the full Oxford English Dictionary has:
# writable, adj.
# Forms: Also writeable.

with quotes including:
# 1913    G. B. Shaw Let. 26 Mar. in Bernard Shaw & Mrs. P.
# Campbell (1952) 104,   I have written everything that is
# writeable: The rest must be viva voce.

-- PMM
Stefan Hajnoczi April 27, 2011, 7:57 a.m. UTC | #6 
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de> wrote:
> Am 26.04.2011 19:04, schrieb Jan Marten Simons:
>>
>> Am Dienstag 26 April 2011 11:25:58 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Replace writeable -> writable
>>>
>>> Why make this change? writeable and writable are both commonly used
>>> spellings.
>>
>> It seems like "writeable" is the commonly used term in computer sciences
>> and
>> "writable" is the normal english adjective formed from "to write" +
>> "-able" in
>> general English.[1]
>>
>> As we are refering to computer science related "writeable" it should be
>> left
>> as is imho. But as I'm no native speaker, you might feel different on
>> this.
>> On a side note: Samba offers both spellings as valid for thier
>> configuration
>> files. [2]
>>
>> [1] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/writeable
>> [2] http://forums.contribs.org/index.php?topic=22258.0
>>
>> With regards,
>>
>> Dipl. Phys.
>> Jan M. Simons
>>
>> Institute of Crystallography
>> RWTH Aachen University
>
> Commonly used is not necessarily correct.
>
> The Oxford dictionary only accepts writable (even when I select
> american english). Same result with Merriam-Webster.
> Google suggests writable instead of writeable.
>
> I see "writeable" only in computer programs and related contexts,
> therefore I assume that it is simply a very common spelling error
> contributed by non-native speakers (like myself). Interesting
> detail: The spelling checker of my mailing client (Icedove) marks
> writeable as correct and writable as wrong (which is obviously wrong).
> Maybe I should send a bug report to Debian.
>
> The ratio of writeable:writable in unpatched qemu is 37:47.
> Even if both writings were correct, I might argue that a
> uniform spelling is better and choose the form which is more commonly
> used.

The patch mostly touches comments and won't affect external
interfaces, it makes the code consistent.  So let's take it and move
on:
http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/stefanha.git/shortlog/refs/heads/trivial-patches

Stefan
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index f731c7a..8767d31 100644
--- a/block.c
+++ b/block.c
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@  static int bdrv_open_common(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *filename,
     open_flags = flags & ~(BDRV_O_SNAPSHOT | BDRV_O_NO_BACKING);
 
     /*
-     * Snapshots should be writeable.
+     * Snapshots should be writable.
      */
     if (bs->is_temporary) {
         open_flags |= BDRV_O_RDWR;
diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
index 98946d7..0392ca8 100644
--- a/block/sheepdog.c
+++ b/block/sheepdog.c
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@  static inline uint64_t fnv_64a_buf(void *buf, size_t len, uint64_t hval)
     return hval;
 }
 
-static inline int is_data_obj_writeable(SheepdogInode *inode, unsigned int idx)
+static inline int is_data_obj_writable(SheepdogInode *inode, unsigned int idx)
 {
     return inode->vdi_id == inode->data_vdi_id[idx];
 }
@@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@  static void sd_readv_writev_bh_cb(void *p)
 
             create = 1;
         } else if (acb->aiocb_type == AIOCB_WRITE_UDATA
-                   && !is_data_obj_writeable(inode, idx)) {
+                   && !is_data_obj_writable(inode, idx)) {
             /* Copy-On-Write */
             create = 1;
             old_oid = oid;
diff --git a/hw/eepro100.c b/hw/eepro100.c
index ffcbc3d..dabb64a 100644
--- a/hw/eepro100.c
+++ b/hw/eepro100.c
@@ -1125,7 +1125,7 @@  static void eepro100_write_eeprom(eeprom_t * eeprom, uint8_t val)
 {
     TRACE(EEPROM, logout("val=0x%02x\n", val));
 
-    /* mask unwriteable bits */
+    /* mask unwritable bits */
 #if 0
     val = SET_MASKED(val, 0x31, eeprom->value);
 #endif
diff --git a/hw/eeprom93xx.c b/hw/eeprom93xx.c
index 660b28f..7b21f98 100644
--- a/hw/eeprom93xx.c
+++ b/hw/eeprom93xx.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@  struct _eeprom_t {
     uint8_t  tick;
     uint8_t  address;
     uint8_t  command;
-    uint8_t  writeable;
+    uint8_t  writable;
 
     uint8_t eecs;
     uint8_t eesk;
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@  static const VMStateDescription vmstate_eeprom = {
         VMSTATE_UINT8(tick, eeprom_t),
         VMSTATE_UINT8(address, eeprom_t),
         VMSTATE_UINT8(command, eeprom_t),
-        VMSTATE_UINT8(writeable, eeprom_t),
+        VMSTATE_UINT8(writable, eeprom_t),
 
         VMSTATE_UINT8(eecs, eeprom_t),
         VMSTATE_UINT8(eesk, eeprom_t),
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@  void eeprom93xx_write(eeprom_t *eeprom, int eecs, int eesk, int eedi)
         address = 0x0;
     } else if (eeprom->eecs && ! eecs) {
         /* End chip select cycle. This triggers write / erase. */
-        if (eeprom->writeable) {
+        if (eeprom->writable) {
             uint8_t subcommand = address >> (eeprom->addrbits - 2);
             if (command == 0 && subcommand == 2) {
                 /* Erase all. */
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@  void eeprom93xx_write(eeprom_t *eeprom, int eecs, int eesk, int eedi)
                     switch (address >> (eeprom->addrbits - 2)) {
                         case 0:
                             logout("write disable command\n");
-                            eeprom->writeable = 0;
+                            eeprom->writable = 0;
                             break;
                         case 1:
                             logout("write all command\n");
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@  void eeprom93xx_write(eeprom_t *eeprom, int eecs, int eesk, int eedi)
                             break;
                         case 3:
                             logout("write enable command\n");
-                            eeprom->writeable = 1;
+                            eeprom->writable = 1;
                             break;
                     }
                 } else {
diff --git a/hw/msi.c b/hw/msi.c
index 3dc3a24..b81ac79 100644
--- a/hw/msi.c
+++ b/hw/msi.c
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@  int msi_init(struct PCIDevice *dev, uint8_t offset,
     pci_set_word(dev->wmask + msi_data_off(dev, msi64bit), 0xffff);
 
     if (msi_per_vector_mask) {
-        /* Make mask bits 0 to nr_vectors - 1 writeable. */
+        /* Make mask bits 0 to nr_vectors - 1 writable. */
         pci_set_long(dev->wmask + msi_mask_off(dev, msi64bit),
                      0xffffffff >> (PCI_MSI_VECTORS_MAX - nr_vectors));
     }
diff --git a/hw/msix.c b/hw/msix.c
index daaf9b7..af40e26 100644
--- a/hw/msix.c
+++ b/hw/msix.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@  static int msix_add_config(struct PCIDevice *pdev, unsigned short nentries,
     pci_set_long(config + MSIX_PBA_OFFSET, (bar_size + MSIX_PAGE_PENDING) |
                  bar_nr);
     pdev->msix_cap = config_offset;
-    /* Make flags bit writeable. */
+    /* Make flags bit writable. */
     pdev->wmask[config_offset + MSIX_CONTROL_OFFSET] |= MSIX_ENABLE_MASK |
 	    MSIX_MASKALL_MASK;
     return 0;
diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
index 6b577e1..5026303 100644
--- a/hw/pci.c
+++ b/hw/pci.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@  void pci_device_reset(PCIDevice *dev)
     dev->irq_state = 0;
     pci_update_irq_status(dev);
     pci_device_deassert_intx(dev);
-    /* Clear all writeable bits */
+    /* Clear all writable bits */
     pci_word_test_and_clear_mask(dev->config + PCI_COMMAND,
                                  pci_get_word(dev->wmask + PCI_COMMAND) |
                                  pci_get_word(dev->w1cmask + PCI_COMMAND));
@@ -863,7 +863,7 @@  void pci_register_bar(PCIDevice *pci_dev, int region_num,
     wmask = ~(size - 1);
     addr = pci_bar(pci_dev, region_num);
     if (region_num == PCI_ROM_SLOT) {
-        /* ROM enable bit is writeable */
+        /* ROM enable bit is writable */
         wmask |= PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE;
     }
     pci_set_long(pci_dev->config + addr, type);
@@ -1950,7 +1950,7 @@  void pci_del_capability(PCIDevice *pdev, uint8_t cap_id, uint8_t size)
     if (!offset)
         return;
     pdev->config[prev] = pdev->config[offset + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT];
-    /* Make capability writeable again */
+    /* Make capability writable again */
     memset(pdev->wmask + offset, 0xff, size);
     memset(pdev->w1cmask + offset, 0, size);
     /* Clear cmask as device-specific registers can't be checked */
diff --git a/hw/pci.h b/hw/pci.h
index 52ee8c9..90121ca 100644
--- a/hw/pci.h
+++ b/hw/pci.h
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@  struct PCIDevice {
     /* PCI config space */
     uint8_t *config;
 
-    /* Used to enable config checks on load. Note that writeable bits are
+    /* Used to enable config checks on load. Note that writable bits are
      * never checked even if set in cmask. */
     uint8_t *cmask;
 
diff --git a/hw/rtl8139.c b/hw/rtl8139.c
index 515652f..a97029f 100644
--- a/hw/rtl8139.c
+++ b/hw/rtl8139.c
@@ -1399,7 +1399,7 @@  static void rtl8139_ChipCmd_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
         s->currCPlusTxDesc = 0;
     }
 
-    /* mask unwriteable bits */
+    /* mask unwritable bits */
     val = SET_MASKED(val, 0xe3, s->bChipCmdState);
 
     /* Deassert reset pin before next read */
@@ -1443,7 +1443,7 @@  static void rtl8139_CpCmd_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
 
     s->cplus_enabled = 1;
 
-    /* mask unwriteable bits */
+    /* mask unwritable bits */
     val = SET_MASKED(val, 0xff84, s->CpCmd);
 
     s->CpCmd = val;
@@ -1472,7 +1472,7 @@  static uint32_t rtl8139_IntrMitigate_read(RTL8139State *s)
     return ret;
 }
 
-static int rtl8139_config_writeable(RTL8139State *s)
+static int rtl8139_config_writable(RTL8139State *s)
 {
     if (s->Cfg9346 & Cfg9346_Unlock)
     {
@@ -1490,10 +1490,10 @@  static void rtl8139_BasicModeCtrl_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
 
     DPRINTF("BasicModeCtrl register write(w) val=0x%04x\n", val);
 
-    /* mask unwriteable bits */
+    /* mask unwritable bits */
     uint32_t mask = 0x4cff;
 
-    if (1 || !rtl8139_config_writeable(s))
+    if (1 || !rtl8139_config_writable(s))
     {
         /* Speed setting and autonegotiation enable bits are read-only */
         mask |= 0x3000;
@@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@  static void rtl8139_BasicModeStatus_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
 
     DPRINTF("BasicModeStatus register write(w) val=0x%04x\n", val);
 
-    /* mask unwriteable bits */
+    /* mask unwritable bits */
     val = SET_MASKED(val, 0xff3f, s->BasicModeStatus);
 
     s->BasicModeStatus = val;
@@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@  static void rtl8139_Cfg9346_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
 
     DPRINTF("Cfg9346 write val=0x%02x\n", val);
 
-    /* mask unwriteable bits */
+    /* mask unwritable bits */
     val = SET_MASKED(val, 0x31, s->Cfg9346);
 
     uint32_t opmode = val & 0xc0;
@@ -1594,10 +1594,11 @@  static void rtl8139_Config0_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
 
     DPRINTF("Config0 write val=0x%02x\n", val);
 
-    if (!rtl8139_config_writeable(s))
+    if (!rtl8139_config_writable(s)) {
         return;
+    }
 
-    /* mask unwriteable bits */
+    /* mask unwritable bits */
     val = SET_MASKED(val, 0xf8, s->Config0);
 
     s->Config0 = val;
@@ -1618,10 +1619,11 @@  static void rtl8139_Config1_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
 
     DPRINTF("Config1 write val=0x%02x\n", val);
 
-    if (!rtl8139_config_writeable(s))
+    if (!rtl8139_config_writable(s)) {
         return;
+    }
 
-    /* mask unwriteable bits */
+    /* mask unwritable bits */
     val = SET_MASKED(val, 0xC, s->Config1);
 
     s->Config1 = val;
@@ -1642,10 +1644,11 @@  static void rtl8139_Config3_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
 
     DPRINTF("Config3 write val=0x%02x\n", val);
 
-    if (!rtl8139_config_writeable(s))
+    if (!rtl8139_config_writable(s)) {
         return;
+    }
 
-    /* mask unwriteable bits */
+    /* mask unwritable bits */
     val = SET_MASKED(val, 0x8F, s->Config3);
 
     s->Config3 = val;
@@ -1666,10 +1669,11 @@  static void rtl8139_Config4_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
 
     DPRINTF("Config4 write val=0x%02x\n", val);
 
-    if (!rtl8139_config_writeable(s))
+    if (!rtl8139_config_writable(s)) {
         return;
+    }
 
-    /* mask unwriteable bits */
+    /* mask unwritable bits */
     val = SET_MASKED(val, 0x0a, s->Config4);
 
     s->Config4 = val;
@@ -1690,7 +1694,7 @@  static void rtl8139_Config5_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
 
     DPRINTF("Config5 write val=0x%02x\n", val);
 
-    /* mask unwriteable bits */
+    /* mask unwritable bits */
     val = SET_MASKED(val, 0x80, s->Config5);
 
     s->Config5 = val;
@@ -1743,7 +1747,7 @@  static void rtl8139_RxConfig_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
 {
     DPRINTF("RxConfig write val=0x%08x\n", val);
 
-    /* mask unwriteable bits */
+    /* mask unwritable bits */
     val = SET_MASKED(val, 0xf0fc0040, s->RxConfig);
 
     s->RxConfig = val;
@@ -2610,7 +2614,7 @@  static void rtl8139_IntrMask_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
 {
     DPRINTF("IntrMask write(w) val=0x%04x\n", val);
 
-    /* mask unwriteable bits */
+    /* mask unwritable bits */
     val = SET_MASKED(val, 0x1e00, s->IntrMask);
 
     s->IntrMask = val;
@@ -2642,7 +2646,7 @@  static void rtl8139_IntrStatus_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
 #else
     uint16_t newStatus = s->IntrStatus & ~val;
 
-    /* mask unwriteable bits */
+    /* mask unwritable bits */
     newStatus = SET_MASKED(newStatus, 0x1e00, s->IntrStatus);
 
     /* writing 1 to interrupt status register bit clears it */
@@ -2686,7 +2690,7 @@  static void rtl8139_MultiIntr_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
 {
     DPRINTF("MultiIntr write(w) val=0x%04x\n", val);
 
-    /* mask unwriteable bits */
+    /* mask unwritable bits */
     val = SET_MASKED(val, 0xf000, s->MultiIntr);
 
     s->MultiIntr = val;
diff --git a/hw/sun4m_iommu.c b/hw/sun4m_iommu.c
index bba69ee..7f5dad5 100644
--- a/hw/sun4m_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/sun4m_iommu.c
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ 
 #define IOPTE_PAGE          0xffffff00 /* Physical page number (PA[35:12]) */
 #define IOPTE_CACHE         0x00000080 /* Cached (in vme IOCACHE or
                                           Viking/MXCC) */
-#define IOPTE_WRITE         0x00000004 /* Writeable */
+#define IOPTE_WRITE         0x00000004 /* Writable */
 #define IOPTE_VALID         0x00000002 /* IOPTE is valid */
 #define IOPTE_WAZ           0x00000001 /* Write as zeros */
 
diff --git a/target-mips/translate_init.c b/target-mips/translate_init.c
index 590e092..8d9b5b9 100644
--- a/target-mips/translate_init.c
+++ b/target-mips/translate_init.c
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@  static const mips_def_t mips_defs[] =
       .CP0_Config1 = (1 << CP0C1_FP) | (47 << CP0C1_MMU),
       .SYNCI_Step = 16,
       .CCRes = 2,
-      .CP0_Status_rw_bitmask = 0xF5D0FF1F,   /*bit5:7 not writeable*/
+      .CP0_Status_rw_bitmask = 0xF5D0FF1F,   /*bit5:7 not writable*/
       .CP1_fcr0 = (0x5 << FCR0_PRID) | (0x1 << FCR0_REV),
       .SEGBITS = 40,
       .PABITS = 40,