Message ID | 20110408163349.GA1212@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:33:49AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > diff --git a/configure b/configure > index ae97e11..c5b85fe 100755 > --- a/configure > +++ b/configure > @@ -1233,7 +1233,8 @@ else > fi > sdl=no > fi > -if test -n "$cross_prefix" && test "`basename $sdlconfig`" = sdl-config; then > +if test -n "$cross_prefix" -a -n "$sdlconfig" && \ > + test "`basename $sdlconfig`" = sdl-config; then Instead of doing test -n "$sdlconfig" first with short-circuit evaluation, I think would should do: test $(basename "$sdlconfig") = sdl-config Then you don't need to test sdlconfig because basename will produce an empty string without error. Stefan
On 04/08/2011 01:56 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:33:49AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: >> diff --git a/configure b/configure >> index ae97e11..c5b85fe 100755 >> --- a/configure >> +++ b/configure >> @@ -1233,7 +1233,8 @@ else >> fi >> sdl=no >> fi >> -if test -n "$cross_prefix"&& test "`basename $sdlconfig`" = sdl-config; then >> +if test -n "$cross_prefix" -a -n "$sdlconfig"&& \ >> + test "`basename $sdlconfig`" = sdl-config; then > Instead of doing test -n "$sdlconfig" first with short-circuit > evaluation, I think would should do: > > test $(basename "$sdlconfig") = sdl-config $() is a bash-ism FYI. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Then you don't need to test sdlconfig because basename will produce an > empty string without error. > > Stefan >
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:06:57 -0500 Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote: > On 04/08/2011 01:56 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:33:49AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > >> diff --git a/configure b/configure > >> index ae97e11..c5b85fe 100755 > >> --- a/configure > >> +++ b/configure > >> @@ -1233,7 +1233,8 @@ else > >> fi > >> sdl=no > >> fi > >> -if test -n "$cross_prefix"&& test "`basename $sdlconfig`" = sdl-config; then > >> +if test -n "$cross_prefix" -a -n "$sdlconfig"&& \ > >> + test "`basename $sdlconfig`" = sdl-config; then > > Instead of doing test -n "$sdlconfig" first with short-circuit > > evaluation, I think would should do: > > > > test $(basename "$sdlconfig") = sdl-config > > $() is a bash-ism FYI. See section 2.6.3 of http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html And I've tested that it works in dash. -Scott
diff --git a/configure b/configure index ae97e11..c5b85fe 100755 --- a/configure +++ b/configure @@ -1233,7 +1233,8 @@ else fi sdl=no fi -if test -n "$cross_prefix" && test "`basename $sdlconfig`" = sdl-config; then +if test -n "$cross_prefix" -a -n "$sdlconfig" && \ + test "`basename $sdlconfig`" = sdl-config; then echo warning: using "\"$sdlconfig\"" to detect cross-compiled sdl >&2 fi
basename prints a missing-argument error when sdlconfig is empty and we're cross-compiling. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> --- configure | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)