[v4,1/2] dt-bindings: eeprom: at24: add "atmel,24c2048"

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

czw., 29 lis 2018 o 20:59 Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> napisał(a):
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt
> index aededdbc262b..f9a7c984274c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ Required properties:
>                  "atmel,24c256",
>                  "atmel,24c512",
>                  "atmel,24c1024",
> +                "atmel,24c2048",
>
>                  If <manufacturer> is not "atmel", then a fallback must be used
>                  with the same <model> and "atmel" as manufacturer.
> --
> 2.11.0
>

Hi Rob,

this is a trivial patch - can we have your Ack so that I can send my
PR to Wolfram for 4.21?

Thanks in advance,
Bartosz

> this is a trivial patch - can we have your Ack so that I can send my
> PR to Wolfram for 4.21?

I think it is OK for trivial patches to go without Rob's explicit ack.
At least this is how I handle it and I think I agreed long time ago with
him about that...

On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 03:11:06PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > this is a trivial patch - can we have your Ack so that I can send my
> > PR to Wolfram for 4.21?

Pinging won't help. You can check my queue in patchwork.

> I think it is OK for trivial patches to go without Rob's explicit ack.
> At least this is how I handle it and I think I agreed long time ago with
> him about that...
> 

Indeed. In case you still want it:

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>