| Message ID | a3265a84052a7c11ae96e61e39adc988ca980d66.1539020938.git.leonard.crestez@nxp.com |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Delegated to: | Lorenzo Pieralisi |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ARM: dts: imx6sx: Add DISPLAY power domain support | expand |
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:06:23PM +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote: > This was implemented in the driver but not actually defined and > referenced in dts. This makes it always on. > > From reference manual in section "10.4.1.4.1 Power Distribution": > > "Display domain - The DISPLAY domain contains GIS, CSI, PXP, LCDIF, > PCIe, DCIC, and LDB. It is supplied by internal regulator." > > The current pd_pcie is actually only for PCIE_PHY, the PCIE ip block is > actually inside the DISPLAY domain. Handle this by adding the pcie node > in both power domains. > > Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com> Applied, thanks.
On 10/31/2018 8:12 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:06:23PM +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote: >> This was implemented in the driver but not actually defined and >> referenced in dts. This makes it always on. >> >> From reference manual in section "10.4.1.4.1 Power Distribution": >> >> "Display domain - The DISPLAY domain contains GIS, CSI, PXP, LCDIF, >> PCIe, DCIC, and LDB. It is supplied by internal regulator." >> >> The current pd_pcie is actually only for PCIE_PHY, the PCIE ip block is >> actually inside the DISPLAY domain. Handle this by adding the pcie node >> in both power domains. >> >> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com> > > Applied, thanks. As mentioned in the cover letter this requires multi-PD support in imx-pci to be implemented, specifically PATCH 3/4 of this series: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/996810/ Unless that also gets merged soon via pci I expect issues in linux-next. The patch already has reviewed-by tags so "merging it soon" is not unreasonable. Link to cover: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/996807/ There is also an mxsfb dependency but that's already merged in torvalds/master.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:17:50PM +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote: > On 10/31/2018 8:12 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:06:23PM +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote: > >> This was implemented in the driver but not actually defined and > >> referenced in dts. This makes it always on. > >> > >> From reference manual in section "10.4.1.4.1 Power Distribution": > >> > >> "Display domain - The DISPLAY domain contains GIS, CSI, PXP, LCDIF, > >> PCIe, DCIC, and LDB. It is supplied by internal regulator." > >> > >> The current pd_pcie is actually only for PCIE_PHY, the PCIE ip block is > >> actually inside the DISPLAY domain. Handle this by adding the pcie node > >> in both power domains. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com> > > > > Applied, thanks. > > As mentioned in the cover letter this requires multi-PD support in > imx-pci to be implemented, specifically PATCH 3/4 of this series: > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/996810/ > > Unless that also gets merged soon via pci I expect issues in linux-next. I do not know what you mean by "issues in linux-next" (I assume you mean when Shawn sends the patches to linux-next in preparation for v4.21); we have not planned any other PCI pull request for v4.20-rc1 material. > The patch already has reviewed-by tags so "merging it soon" is not > unreasonable. I can ACK it if Shawn wants to pull it, it may take a while to see it in -next if it has to go through the PCI tree, I think it is better to queue the series without splitting the patches across multiple channels though. Lorenzo
On 10/31/2018 5:06 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:17:50PM +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote: >> On 10/31/2018 8:12 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:06:23PM +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote: >>>> This was implemented in the driver but not actually defined and >>>> referenced in dts. This makes it always on. >>>> >>>> From reference manual in section "10.4.1.4.1 Power Distribution": >>>> >>>> "Display domain - The DISPLAY domain contains GIS, CSI, PXP, LCDIF, >>>> PCIe, DCIC, and LDB. It is supplied by internal regulator." >>>> >>>> The current pd_pcie is actually only for PCIE_PHY, the PCIE ip block is >>>> actually inside the DISPLAY domain. Handle this by adding the pcie node >>>> in both power domains. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com> >>> >>> Applied, thanks. >> >> As mentioned in the cover letter this requires multi-PD support in >> imx-pci to be implemented, specifically PATCH 3/4 of this series: >> >> Unless that also gets merged soon via pci I expect issues in linux-next. > > I do not know what you mean by "issues in linux-next" (I assume you mean > when Shawn sends the patches to linux-next in preparation for v4.21); we > have not planned any other PCI pull request for v4.20-rc1 material. Yes my concern is linux-next for 4.21 >> The patch already has reviewed-by tags so "merging it soon" is not >> unreasonable. > > I can ACK it if Shawn wants to pull it, it may take a while to see it > in -next if it has to go through the PCI tree, I think it is better > to queue the series without splitting the patches across multiple > channels though. This sounds great to me, merging the whole series through Shawn's imx tree would prevent issues in linux-next or possible bisect failures in 4.21.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:17:50PM +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote: > On 10/31/2018 8:12 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:06:23PM +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote: > >> This was implemented in the driver but not actually defined and > >> referenced in dts. This makes it always on. > >> > >> From reference manual in section "10.4.1.4.1 Power Distribution": > >> > >> "Display domain - The DISPLAY domain contains GIS, CSI, PXP, LCDIF, > >> PCIe, DCIC, and LDB. It is supplied by internal regulator." > >> > >> The current pd_pcie is actually only for PCIE_PHY, the PCIE ip block is > >> actually inside the DISPLAY domain. Handle this by adding the pcie node > >> in both power domains. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com> > > > > Applied, thanks. > > As mentioned in the cover letter this requires multi-PD support in > imx-pci to be implemented, specifically PATCH 3/4 of this series: > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/996810/ > > Unless that also gets merged soon via pci I expect issues in linux-next. > The patch already has reviewed-by tags so "merging it soon" is not > unreasonable. Oops, I overlooked the notes in cover-letter. Let's use the approach as suggested there - applying the dts change after all driver dependencies are landed. Patch dropped, sorry.
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi index 95a3c1cb877d..b7f815d82d1b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi @@ -778,10 +778,22 @@ #power-domain-cells = <0>; power-supply = <®_soc>; clocks = <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_GPU>; }; + pd_disp: power-domain@2 { + reg = <2>; + #power-domain-cells = <0>; + clocks = <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_PXP_AXI>, + <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_DISPLAY_AXI>, + <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_LCDIF1_PIX>, + <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_LCDIF_APB>, + <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_LCDIF2_PIX>, + <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_CSI>, + <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_VADC>; + }; + pd_pci: power-domain@3 { reg = <3>; #power-domain-cells = <0>; power-supply = <®_pcie>; }; @@ -1196,10 +1208,11 @@ reg = <0x02218000 0x4000>; interrupts = <GIC_SPI 8 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; clocks = <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_PXP_AXI>, <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_DISPLAY_AXI>; clock-names = "pxp-axi", "disp-axi"; + power-domains = <&pd_disp>; status = "disabled"; }; csi2: csi@221c000 { reg = <0x0221c000 0x4000>; @@ -1217,10 +1230,11 @@ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; clocks = <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_LCDIF1_PIX>, <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_LCDIF_APB>, <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_DISPLAY_AXI>; clock-names = "pix", "axi", "disp_axi"; + power-domains = <&pd_disp>; status = "disabled"; }; lcdif2: lcdif@2224000 { compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-lcdif", "fsl,imx28-lcdif"; @@ -1228,19 +1242,21 @@ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 6 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; clocks = <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_LCDIF2_PIX>, <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_LCDIF_APB>, <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_DISPLAY_AXI>; clock-names = "pix", "axi", "disp_axi"; + power-domains = <&pd_disp>; status = "disabled"; }; vadc: vadc@2228000 { reg = <0x02228000 0x4000>, <0x0222c000 0x4000>; reg-names = "vadc-vafe", "vadc-vdec"; clocks = <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_VADC>, <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_CSI>; clock-names = "vadc", "csi"; + power-domains = <&pd_disp>; status = "disabled"; }; }; adc1: adc@2280000 { @@ -1361,10 +1377,11 @@ clocks = <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_PCIE_AXI>, <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_LVDS1_OUT>, <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_PCIE_REF_125M>, <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_DISPLAY_AXI>; clock-names = "pcie", "pcie_bus", "pcie_phy", "pcie_inbound_axi"; - power-domains = <&pd_pci>; + power-domains = <&pd_disp>, <&pd_pci>; + power-domain-names = "pcie", "pcie_phy"; status = "disabled"; }; }; };
This was implemented in the driver but not actually defined and referenced in dts. This makes it always on. From reference manual in section "10.4.1.4.1 Power Distribution": "Display domain - The DISPLAY domain contains GIS, CSI, PXP, LCDIF, PCIe, DCIC, and LDB. It is supplied by internal regulator." The current pd_pcie is actually only for PCIE_PHY, the PCIE ip block is actually inside the DISPLAY domain. Handle this by adding the pcie node in both power domains. Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)