diff mbox

[U-Boot] mx25: Make the UART port number explicit in its setup function

Message ID F09210E57DF486449C294B7BFB865347150304@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net
State Accepted
Delegated to: Stefano Babic
Headers show

Commit Message

Estevam Fabio-R49496 March 2, 2011, 1:31 a.m. UTC 
Hi Stefano,

Ping?

Regards,

Fabio Estevam

-----Original Message-----
From: Estevam Fabio-R49496 
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 5:50 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: sbabic@denx.de; Estevam Fabio-R49496
Subject: [PATCH] mx25: Make the UART port number explicit in its setup function

Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
---
 arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c |    2 +-
 board/karo/tx25/tx25.c                |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Stefano Babic March 2, 2011, 9:15 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 03/02/2011 02:31 AM, Estevam Fabio-R49496 wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
> 

Hi Fabio,

> Ping?

As I do not see any fix for the current release, I have not yet merged
it into u-boot-imx and I will do it when the window is open again. I
imagine your patch is an introduction for further patches, where more as
one uart is used, right ? Should it belong maybe to the same patchset ?

checkpatch reports your patch is corrupted. Strange, I do not why, I
have fixed myself.

Best regards,
Stefano Babic
Fabio Estevam March 2, 2011, 3:19 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 3/2/2011 6:15 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
...
> As I do not see any fix for the current release, I have not yet merged
> it into u-boot-imx and I will do it when the window is open again. I
> imagine your patch is an introduction for further patches, where more as
> one uart is used, right ? Should it belong maybe to the same patchset ?

I was working on adding MX25PDK support and I think that that the UART reference should be explicit, as different boards can boot from different UART ports.
 
> checkpatch reports your patch is corrupted. Strange, I do not why, I
> have fixed myself.

Thanks, I haven´t noticed this.

Regards,

Fabio Estevam
Stefano Babic March 2, 2011, 7:08 p.m. UTC | #3 
On 03/02/2011 04:19 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:

> I was working on adding MX25PDK support and I think that that the
> UART reference should be explicit, as different boards can boot from
> different UART ports.

I have applied your patch to u-boot-imx, next branch. Maybe it is easier
to you to use it as base for your port.

Best regards,
Stefano Babic
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c
index c6e1146..150eb69 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@  int cpu_mmc_init (bd_t * bis)  }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MXC_UART
-void mx25_uart_init_pins (void)
+void mx25_uart1_init_pins(void)
 {
 	struct iomuxc_mux_ctl *muxctl;
 	struct iomuxc_pad_ctl *padctl;
diff --git a/board/karo/tx25/tx25.c b/board/karo/tx25/tx25.c index dc57d5c..269858c 100644
--- a/board/karo/tx25/tx25.c
+++ b/board/karo/tx25/tx25.c
@@ -141,9 +141,9 @@  void tx25_fec_init(void)  int board_init()  {  #ifdef CONFIG_MXC_UART
-	extern void mx25_uart_init_pins(void);
+	extern void mx25_uart1_init_pins(void);
 
-	mx25_uart_init_pins();
+	mx25_uart1_init_pins();
 #endif
 	/* board id for linux */
 	gd->bd->bi_arch_number = MACH_TYPE_TX25;
--
1.6.0.4