Message ID | 000001cbbd85$6c6ec590$454c50b0$@bolton@arm.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
> Is the following patch OK for trunk? > > > 2011-01-26 Ian Bolton <ian.bolton@arm.com> > > * testsuite/gcc.dg/20100906-1.c: Use -fno-short-enums > option for "target arm_eabi". > > > Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20100906-1.c > =================================================================== > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20100906-1.c (revision 168543) > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20100906-1.c (working copy) > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > /* { dg-do run } */ > /* { dg-options "-O2" } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-short-enums -Wl,--no-enum-size-warning" > {target > arm_eabi} } */ > > /* This testcase got misoptimized by combine due to a wrong setting of > subst_low_luid in try_combine. */ PING.
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 10:56 +0000, Ian Bolton wrote: > > Is the following patch OK for trunk? > > > > > > 2011-01-26 Ian Bolton <ian.bolton@arm.com> > > > > * testsuite/gcc.dg/20100906-1.c: Use -fno-short-enums > > option for "target arm_eabi". > > > > > > Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20100906-1.c > > =================================================================== > > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20100906-1.c (revision 168543) > > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20100906-1.c (working copy) > > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > > /* { dg-do run } */ > > /* { dg-options "-O2" } */ > > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-short-enums -Wl,--no-enum-size-warning" > > {target > > arm_eabi} } */ > > > > /* This testcase got misoptimized by combine due to a wrong setting of > > subst_low_luid in try_combine. */ > > PING. > > OK. R.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20100906-1.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20100906-1.c (revision 168543) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20100906-1.c (working copy) @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ /* { dg-do run } */ /* { dg-options "-O2" } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-short-enums -Wl,--no-enum-size-warning" {target arm_eabi} } */ /* This testcase got misoptimized by combine due to a wrong setting of