[V2] pinctrl: actions: fix unsigned less than zero comparison

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

The check to see if platform_get_irq failed is performed on the
unsigned value of pctrl->irq[i] and the check is never true because
an unsigned cannot be less than zero.  Fix this by assinging the
signed int ret to the return of platform_get_irq and checking ret
instead.

Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1470247 ("Unsigned comparison against 0")

Fixes: 6c5d0736e9c0 ("pinctrl: actions: Add interrupt support for OWL S900 SoC")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---

V2: move pctrl->irq[i] = ret assignment below the check on ret, thanks
to Manivannan Sadhasivam for suggesting this change.

---
 drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 01:47:08PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> The check to see if platform_get_irq failed is performed on the
> unsigned value of pctrl->irq[i] and the check is never true because
> an unsigned cannot be less than zero.  Fix this by assinging the
> signed int ret to the return of platform_get_irq and checking ret
> instead.
> 
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1470247 ("Unsigned comparison against 0")
> 
> Fixes: 6c5d0736e9c0 ("pinctrl: actions: Add interrupt support for OWL S900 SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Thanks!

Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> 

Regards,
Mani

> ---
> 
> V2: move pctrl->irq[i] = ret assignment below the check on ret, thanks
> to Manivannan Sadhasivam for suggesting this change.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
> index 4fa9cc377b3b..24dc57fcac51 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
> @@ -1026,11 +1026,10 @@ int owl_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < pctrl->num_irq ; i++) {
> -		pctrl->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
> -		if (pctrl->irq[i] < 0) {
> -			ret = pctrl->irq[i];
> +		ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
> +		if (ret < 0)
>  			goto err_exit;
> -		}
> +		pctrl->irq[i] = ret;
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = owl_gpio_init(pctrl);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 2:47 PM Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The check to see if platform_get_irq failed is performed on the
> unsigned value of pctrl->irq[i] and the check is never true because
> an unsigned cannot be less than zero.  Fix this by assinging the
> signed int ret to the return of platform_get_irq and checking ret
> instead.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1470247 ("Unsigned comparison against 0")
>
> Fixes: 6c5d0736e9c0 ("pinctrl: actions: Add interrupt support for OWL S900 SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>
> V2: move pctrl->irq[i] = ret assignment below the check on ret, thanks
> to Manivannan Sadhasivam for suggesting this change.

Patch applied with Manivannan's ACK!

(Hope it's the right version now.)

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html