| Message ID | 1295837418-3884-4-git-send-email-bryan.wu@canonical.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Delegated to: | Tim Gardner |
| Headers | show |
On 01/24/2011 03:50 AM, Bryan Wu wrote: > Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> > --- > meta-source/debian/control.common | 8 ++++++++ > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta-source/debian/control.common b/meta-source/debian/control.common > index d8b7f12..be7ad0c 100644 > --- a/meta-source/debian/control.common > +++ b/meta-source/debian/control.common > @@ -5,3 +5,11 @@ Maintainer: Ubuntu Kernel Team <kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com> > Standards-Version: 3.6.1 > Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.13.19), debhelper (>= 5), gawk > Vcs-Git: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git-repos/ubuntu/ubuntu-maverick-meta.git > + Ok, in general. But I find the naming scheme not too intuitive: > +Package: linux-tools-omap4 ^ no ti- > +Architecture: armel > +Section: metapackages > +Depends: ${misc:Depends}, linux-ti-omap4-tools-${kernel-abi-version} ^ with ti- and why not linux-tools-(ti-)omap4-... > +Description: Linux kernel versioned Tools > + This package will always depend on the latest Linux kernel versioned tools > + available. The Ubuntu patches have been applied.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:22:37AM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: > On 01/24/2011 03:50 AM, Bryan Wu wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> > > --- > > meta-source/debian/control.common | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta-source/debian/control.common b/meta-source/debian/control.common > > index d8b7f12..be7ad0c 100644 > > --- a/meta-source/debian/control.common > > +++ b/meta-source/debian/control.common > > @@ -5,3 +5,11 @@ Maintainer: Ubuntu Kernel Team <kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com> > > Standards-Version: 3.6.1 > > Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.13.19), debhelper (>= 5), gawk > > Vcs-Git: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git-repos/ubuntu/ubuntu-maverick-meta.git > > + > > Ok, in general. But I find the naming scheme not too intuitive: > > +Package: linux-tools-omap4 > ^ no ti- > > +Architecture: armel > > +Section: metapackages > > +Depends: ${misc:Depends}, linux-ti-omap4-tools-${kernel-abi-version} > ^ with ti- and why not > linux-tools-(ti-)omap4-... > > +Description: Linux kernel versioned Tools > > + This package will always depend on the latest Linux kernel versioned tools > > + available. The Ubuntu patches have been applied. This is because where we put names at the right hand end they are flavour names. And for better or worse the flavour name here is omap4 and not ti-omap4. -apw
On 01/24/2011 02:58 PM, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:22:37AM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: >> On 01/24/2011 03:50 AM, Bryan Wu wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> >>> --- >>> meta-source/debian/control.common | 8 ++++++++ >>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/meta-source/debian/control.common b/meta-source/debian/control.common >>> index d8b7f12..be7ad0c 100644 >>> --- a/meta-source/debian/control.common >>> +++ b/meta-source/debian/control.common >>> @@ -5,3 +5,11 @@ Maintainer: Ubuntu Kernel Team <kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com> >>> Standards-Version: 3.6.1 >>> Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.13.19), debhelper (>= 5), gawk >>> Vcs-Git: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git-repos/ubuntu/ubuntu-maverick-meta.git >>> + >> >> Ok, in general. But I find the naming scheme not too intuitive: >>> +Package: linux-tools-omap4 >> ^ no ti- >>> +Architecture: armel >>> +Section: metapackages >>> +Depends: ${misc:Depends}, linux-ti-omap4-tools-${kernel-abi-version} >> ^ with ti- and why not >> linux-tools-(ti-)omap4-... >>> +Description: Linux kernel versioned Tools >>> + This package will always depend on the latest Linux kernel versioned tools >>> + available. The Ubuntu patches have been applied. > > This is because where we put names at the right hand end they are > flavour names. And for better or worse the flavour name here is omap4 > and not ti-omap4. > > -apw Yeah, I was more targetting the linux-ti-omap-tools name of the binary which seemed to be odd. I thought we otherwise had been using linux-tools-<flavour>-... but I may be remembering incorrectly. -Stefan
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 04:23:36PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: > On 01/24/2011 02:58 PM, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:22:37AM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: > >> On 01/24/2011 03:50 AM, Bryan Wu wrote: > >>> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> > >>> --- > >>> meta-source/debian/control.common | 8 ++++++++ > >>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/meta-source/debian/control.common b/meta-source/debian/control.common > >>> index d8b7f12..be7ad0c 100644 > >>> --- a/meta-source/debian/control.common > >>> +++ b/meta-source/debian/control.common > >>> @@ -5,3 +5,11 @@ Maintainer: Ubuntu Kernel Team <kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com> > >>> Standards-Version: 3.6.1 > >>> Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.13.19), debhelper (>= 5), gawk > >>> Vcs-Git: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git-repos/ubuntu/ubuntu-maverick-meta.git > >>> + > >> > >> Ok, in general. But I find the naming scheme not too intuitive: > >>> +Package: linux-tools-omap4 > >> ^ no ti- > >>> +Architecture: armel > >>> +Section: metapackages > >>> +Depends: ${misc:Depends}, linux-ti-omap4-tools-${kernel-abi-version} > >> ^ with ti- and why not > >> linux-tools-(ti-)omap4-... > >>> +Description: Linux kernel versioned Tools > >>> + This package will always depend on the latest Linux kernel versioned tools > >>> + available. The Ubuntu patches have been applied. > > > > This is because where we put names at the right hand end they are > > flavour names. And for better or worse the flavour name here is omap4 > > and not ti-omap4. > > > > -apw > Yeah, I was more targetting the linux-ti-omap-tools name of the binary which > seemed to be odd. I thought we otherwise had been using > linux-tools-<flavour>-... but I may be remembering incorrectly. Currently in implementation the tools are actually architecture specific. Unfortuantly we only have linux-* and linux-*-flavour meta package name spaces. The linux-tools name already points to that coming from the master branch. That leaves us with only the flavour specific name available for the ti-omap4 case. In practice we likely should have used -flavour for all of tools just in case flavour specific tools come along in the future, but we have already missed that boat. -apw
diff --git a/meta-source/debian/control.common b/meta-source/debian/control.common index d8b7f12..be7ad0c 100644 --- a/meta-source/debian/control.common +++ b/meta-source/debian/control.common @@ -5,3 +5,11 @@ Maintainer: Ubuntu Kernel Team <kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com> Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.13.19), debhelper (>= 5), gawk Vcs-Git: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git-repos/ubuntu/ubuntu-maverick-meta.git + +Package: linux-tools-omap4 +Architecture: armel +Section: metapackages +Depends: ${misc:Depends}, linux-ti-omap4-tools-${kernel-abi-version} +Description: Linux kernel versioned Tools + This package will always depend on the latest Linux kernel versioned tools + available. The Ubuntu patches have been applied.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> --- meta-source/debian/control.common | 8 ++++++++ 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)