[v3,1/4] clk: tegra: Add la clock for Tegra210

This clock is needed by the memory built-in self test work around.

Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c         | 14 ++++++++++++++
 include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra210-car.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

On 23/01/18 09:22, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> This clock is needed by the memory built-in self test work around.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c         | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra210-car.h |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
> index 9e62608..f790c2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
>  #define CLK_SOURCE_CSITE 0x1d4
>  #define CLK_SOURCE_EMC 0x19c
>  #define CLK_SOURCE_SOR1 0x410
> +#define CLK_SOURCE_LA 0x1f8
>  
>  #define PLLC_BASE 0x80
>  #define PLLC_OUT 0x84
> @@ -2654,6 +2655,13 @@ static int tegra210_init_pllu(void)
>  			      sor1_parents_idx, 0, &sor1_lock),
>  };
>  
> +static const char * const la_parents[] = {
> +	"pll_p", "pll_c2", "pll_c", "pll_c3", "pll_re_out1", "pll_a1", "clk_m", "pll_c4_out0"
> +};
> +

I was comparing this with downstream and it appears that the parents are
listed as "pll_p", "pll_c", "pll_m", "clk_m". Can you double check the
above is correct?

Otherwise ...

> +static struct tegra_clk_periph tegra210_la =
> +	TEGRA_CLK_PERIPH(29, 7, 9, 0, 8, 1, TEGRA_DIVIDER_ROUND_UP, 76, 0, NULL, 0);
> +
>  static __init void tegra210_periph_clk_init(void __iomem *clk_base,
>  					    void __iomem *pmc_base)
>  {
> @@ -2700,6 +2708,12 @@ static __init void tegra210_periph_clk_init(void __iomem *clk_base,
>  					     periph_clk_enb_refcnt);
>  	clks[TEGRA210_CLK_DSIB] = clk;
>  
> +	/* la */
> +	clk = tegra_clk_register_periph("la", la_parents,
> +			ARRAY_SIZE(la_parents), &tegra210_la, clk_base,
> +			CLK_SOURCE_LA, 0);
> +	clks[TEGRA210_CLK_LA] = clk;
> +
>  	/* emc mux */
>  	clk = clk_register_mux(NULL, "emc_mux", mux_pllmcp_clkm,
>  			       ARRAY_SIZE(mux_pllmcp_clkm), 0,
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra210-car.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra210-car.h
> index 6422314..6b77e72 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra210-car.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra210-car.h
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
>  #define TEGRA210_CLK_CSITE 73
>  /* 74 */
>  /* 75 */
> -/* 76 */
> +#define TEGRA210_CLK_LA 76
>  /* 77 */
>  #define TEGRA210_CLK_SOC_THERM 78
>  #define TEGRA210_CLK_DTV 79

Acked-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Cheers
Jon

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:03:31AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 23/01/18 09:22, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > This clock is needed by the memory built-in self test work around.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c         | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra210-car.h |  2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
> > index 9e62608..f790c2d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
> > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
> >  #define CLK_SOURCE_CSITE 0x1d4
> >  #define CLK_SOURCE_EMC 0x19c
> >  #define CLK_SOURCE_SOR1 0x410
> > +#define CLK_SOURCE_LA 0x1f8
> >  
> >  #define PLLC_BASE 0x80
> >  #define PLLC_OUT 0x84
> > @@ -2654,6 +2655,13 @@ static int tegra210_init_pllu(void)
> >  			      sor1_parents_idx, 0, &sor1_lock),
> >  };
> >  
> > +static const char * const la_parents[] = {
> > +	"pll_p", "pll_c2", "pll_c", "pll_c3", "pll_re_out1", "pll_a1", "clk_m", "pll_c4_out0"
> > +};
> > +
> 
> I was comparing this with downstream and it appears that the parents are
> listed as "pll_p", "pll_c", "pll_m", "clk_m". Can you double check the
> above is correct?
> 

For all I can see the parents as listed in dowstream are incorrect. Likely
only pll_p is used in practice, so noone has noticed this. pll_m for example
can only be used by emc since T210, so it cannot be part of the parent list
of la.

Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html