diff mbox series

ixgbe: Don't report unsupported timestamping filters for X550

Message ID 20180109113705.8464-1-mlichvar@redhat.com
State Accepted
Delegated to: Jeff Kirsher
Headers show
Series ixgbe: Don't report unsupported timestamping filters for X550 | expand

Commit Message

Miroslav Lichvar Jan. 9, 2018, 11:37 a.m. UTC
The current code enables on X550 timestamping of all packets for any
filter, which means ethtool should not report any PTP-specific filters
as supported.

Signed-off-by: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c | 37 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Comments

Richard Cochran Jan. 9, 2018, 3:47 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:37:05PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> The current code enables on X550 timestamping of all packets for any
> filter, which means ethtool should not report any PTP-specific filters
> as supported.

Right.  I keep forgetting the rule about this.  It is found in the
comment on ethtool_ts_info:

 * Drivers should only report the filters they actually support without
 * upscaling in the SIOCSHWTSTAMP ioctl. If the SIOCSHWSTAMP request for
 * HWTSTAMP_FILTER_V1_SYNC is supported by HWTSTAMP_FILTER_V1_EVENT, then the
 * driver should only report HWTSTAMP_FILTER_V1_EVENT in this op.

Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Jacob Keller Jan. 9, 2018, 4:05 p.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcochran@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 7:47 AM
> To: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
> Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ixgbe: Don't report unsupported timestamping filters for
> X550
> 
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:37:05PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > The current code enables on X550 timestamping of all packets for any
> > filter, which means ethtool should not report any PTP-specific filters
> > as supported.
> 
> Right.  I keep forgetting the rule about this.  It is found in the
> comment on ethtool_ts_info:
> 
>  * Drivers should only report the filters they actually support without
>  * upscaling in the SIOCSHWTSTAMP ioctl. If the SIOCSHWSTAMP request for
>  * HWTSTAMP_FILTER_V1_SYNC is supported by HWTSTAMP_FILTER_V1_EVENT,
> then the
>  * driver should only report HWTSTAMP_FILTER_V1_EVENT in this op.
> 
> Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>

Yep. Various developers had different ideas about this in the past.

Acked-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>

Thanks,
Jake
Bowers, AndrewX Jan. 10, 2018, 12:35 a.m. UTC | #3
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org] On
> Behalf Of Miroslav Lichvar
> Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 3:37 AM
> To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
> Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ixgbe: Don't report unsupported
> timestamping filters for X550
> 
> The current code enables on X550 timestamping of all packets for any filter,
> which means ethtool should not report any PTP-specific filters as supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c | 37 ++++++++++++-------
> -----
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c
index 0aaf70b..0a5a351 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c
@@ -3086,26 +3086,9 @@  static int ixgbe_get_ts_info(struct net_device *dev,
 	case ixgbe_mac_X550EM_x:
 	case ixgbe_mac_x550em_a:
 		info->rx_filters |= BIT(HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL);
-		/* fallthrough */
+		break;
 	case ixgbe_mac_X540:
 	case ixgbe_mac_82599EB:
-		info->so_timestamping =
-			SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE |
-			SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE |
-			SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE |
-			SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE |
-			SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE |
-			SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE;
-
-		if (adapter->ptp_clock)
-			info->phc_index = ptp_clock_index(adapter->ptp_clock);
-		else
-			info->phc_index = -1;
-
-		info->tx_types =
-			BIT(HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF) |
-			BIT(HWTSTAMP_TX_ON);
-
 		info->rx_filters |=
 			BIT(HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_SYNC) |
 			BIT(HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_DELAY_REQ) |
@@ -3114,6 +3097,24 @@  static int ixgbe_get_ts_info(struct net_device *dev,
 	default:
 		return ethtool_op_get_ts_info(dev, info);
 	}
+
+	info->so_timestamping =
+		SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE |
+		SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE |
+		SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE |
+		SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE |
+		SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE |
+		SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE;
+
+	if (adapter->ptp_clock)
+		info->phc_index = ptp_clock_index(adapter->ptp_clock);
+	else
+		info->phc_index = -1;
+
+	info->tx_types =
+		BIT(HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF) |
+		BIT(HWTSTAMP_TX_ON);
+
 	return 0;
 }