vxge: remove duplicated part of check

This is just a cleanup to make the static checkers happy.  We don't need
to check "own" twice.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, Dan Carpenter wrote:

> This is just a cleanup to make the static checkers happy.  We don't need
> to check "own" twice.

It's indeed probably pretty pointless to put if (!A || (B && A)) because 
then B, which may rely on A being true, has already occurred.  Would 
anyone find if (!A || (A && B)) to be useful for readability?  I found 
20-some other occurrences, mostly of the latter type.

julia


> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-traffic.c b/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-traffic.c
> index 42cc298..4c10d6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-traffic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-traffic.c
> @@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ enum vxge_hw_status vxge_hw_ring_rxd_next_completed(
>  	*t_code	= (u8)VXGE_HW_RING_RXD_T_CODE_GET(control_0);
>  
>  	/* check whether it is not the end */
> -	if (!own || ((*t_code == VXGE_HW_RING_T_CODE_FRM_DROP) && own)) {
> +	if (!own || *t_code == VXGE_HW_RING_T_CODE_FRM_DROP) {
>  
>  		vxge_assert(((struct vxge_hw_ring_rxd_1 *)rxdp)->host_control !=
>  				0);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

> This is just a cleanup to make the static checkers happy.  We don't need
> to check "own" twice.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-traffic.c b/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-
> traffic.c
> index 42cc298..4c10d6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-traffic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-traffic.c
> @@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ enum vxge_hw_status vxge_hw_ring_rxd_next_completed(
>  	*t_code	= (u8)VXGE_HW_RING_RXD_T_CODE_GET(control_0);
> 
>  	/* check whether it is not the end */
> -	if (!own || ((*t_code == VXGE_HW_RING_T_CODE_FRM_DROP) && own)) {
> +	if (!own || *t_code == VXGE_HW_RING_T_CODE_FRM_DROP) {
> 
>  		vxge_assert(((struct vxge_hw_ring_rxd_1 *)rxdp)->host_control
> !=
>  				0);
Looks good, thanks.

Acked-by: Ram Vepa <ram.vepa@exar.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html