mbox

[PULL,for-2.11,0/1] VFIO: Fix vfio-kvm device group registration

Message ID 20171206170019.24842.47488.stgit@gimli.home
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://github.com/awilliam/qemu-vfio.git tags/vfio-fixes-20171206.0

Message

Alex Williamson Dec. 6, 2017, 5:02 p.m. UTC
The following changes since commit 2babfe0c9241c239272a03fec785165a50e8288c:

  Update version for v2.11.0-rc4 release (2017-12-05 16:36:46 +0000)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://github.com/awilliam/qemu-vfio.git tags/vfio-fixes-20171206.0

for you to fetch changes up to 13e6ae741cc0848a1819f435e2251d6d0bfae3e1:

  vfio: Fix vfio-kvm group registration (2017-12-05 13:22:45 -0700)

----------------------------------------------------------------
VFIO fix for v2.11-final

 - Fix bug failing to register all but the first group attached to
   a container with kvm-vfio device (Alex Williamson)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Alex Williamson (1):
      vfio: Fix vfio-kvm group registration

 hw/vfio/common.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Peter Maydell Dec. 6, 2017, 7:07 p.m. UTC | #1
On 6 December 2017 at 17:02, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
> The following changes since commit 2babfe0c9241c239272a03fec785165a50e8288c:
>
>   Update version for v2.11.0-rc4 release (2017-12-05 16:36:46 +0000)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>   git://github.com/awilliam/qemu-vfio.git tags/vfio-fixes-20171206.0
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 13e6ae741cc0848a1819f435e2251d6d0bfae3e1:
>
>   vfio: Fix vfio-kvm group registration (2017-12-05 13:22:45 -0700)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> VFIO fix for v2.11-final
>
>  - Fix bug failing to register all but the first group attached to
>    a container with kvm-vfio device (Alex Williamson)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------

I'm afraid this has missed the boat for 2.11, since we've
already cut what we think should be the final rc. It would
have to be a really critical regression since 2.10...

thanks
-- PMM