Message ID | 20171012034720.11947-1-eblake@redhat.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | make bdrv_get_block_status byte-based | expand |
Am 12.10.2017 um 05:46 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: > There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS, > but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the > reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even > much higher levels). I've therefore started the task of > converting our block status code to report at a byte granularity > rather than sectors. > > Now that 2.11 is open, I'm rebasing/reposting the remaining patches. > > The overall conversion currently looks like: > part 1: bdrv_is_allocated (merged, commit 51b0a488) > part 2: dirty-bitmap (merged, commit ca759622) > part 3: bdrv_get_block_status (this series, v5 at [1]) > part 4: .bdrv_co_block_status (v3 is posted [2], mostly reviewed, but needs rebase) Thanks, applied to the block branch. Kevin
On 10/20/2017 12:45 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 12.10.2017 um 05:46 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: >> There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS, >> but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the >> reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even >> much higher levels). I've therefore started the task of >> converting our block status code to report at a byte granularity >> rather than sectors. >> >> Now that 2.11 is open, I'm rebasing/reposting the remaining patches. >> >> The overall conversion currently looks like: >> part 1: bdrv_is_allocated (merged, commit 51b0a488) >> part 2: dirty-bitmap (merged, commit ca759622) >> part 3: bdrv_get_block_status (this series, v5 at [1]) >> part 4: .bdrv_co_block_status (v3 is posted [2], mostly reviewed, but needs rebase) > > Thanks, applied to the block branch. > > Kevin > Thanks; Eric: does this just leave part four?
On 11/02/2017 04:01 PM, John Snow wrote: >>> The overall conversion currently looks like: >>> part 1: bdrv_is_allocated (merged, commit 51b0a488) >>> part 2: dirty-bitmap (merged, commit ca759622) >>> part 3: bdrv_get_block_status (this series, v5 at [1]) >>> part 4: .bdrv_co_block_status (v3 is posted [2], mostly reviewed, but needs rebase) >> >> Thanks, applied to the block branch. >> >> Kevin >> > > Thanks; > > Eric: does this just leave part four? Yes; the latest version of part four is v4: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-10/msg02940.html