diff mbox

[net] net: don't global ICMP rate limit packets originating from loopback

Message ID 149743965710.19877.13901728209731997446.stgit@firesoul
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Jesper Dangaard Brouer June 14, 2017, 11:27 a.m. UTC
Florian Weimer seems to have a glibc test-case which requires that
loopback interfaces does not get ICMP ratelimited.  This was broken by
commit c0303efeab73 ("net: reduce cycles spend on ICMP replies that
gets rate limited").

An ICMP response will usually be routed back-out the same incoming
interface.  Thus, take advantage of this and skip global ICMP
ratelimit when the incoming device is loopback.  In the unlikely event
that the outgoing it not loopback, due to strange routing policy
rules, ICMP rate limiting still works via peer ratelimiting via
icmpv4_xrlim_allow().  Thus, we should still comply with RFC1812
(section 4.3.2.8 "Rate Limiting").

This seems to fix the reproducer given by Florian.  While still
avoiding to perform expensive and unneeded outgoing route lookup for
rate limited packets (in the non-loopback case).

Fixes: c0303efeab73 ("net: reduce cycles spend on ICMP replies that gets rate limited")
Reported-by: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Reported-by: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
---
 net/ipv4/icmp.c |    8 ++++++--
 net/ipv6/icmp.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

David Miller June 14, 2017, 7:34 p.m. UTC | #1
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:27:37 +0200

> Florian Weimer seems to have a glibc test-case which requires that
> loopback interfaces does not get ICMP ratelimited.  This was broken by
> commit c0303efeab73 ("net: reduce cycles spend on ICMP replies that
> gets rate limited").
> 
> An ICMP response will usually be routed back-out the same incoming
> interface.  Thus, take advantage of this and skip global ICMP
> ratelimit when the incoming device is loopback.  In the unlikely event
> that the outgoing it not loopback, due to strange routing policy
> rules, ICMP rate limiting still works via peer ratelimiting via
> icmpv4_xrlim_allow().  Thus, we should still comply with RFC1812
> (section 4.3.2.8 "Rate Limiting").
> 
> This seems to fix the reproducer given by Florian.  While still
> avoiding to perform expensive and unneeded outgoing route lookup for
> rate limited packets (in the non-loopback case).
> 
> Fixes: c0303efeab73 ("net: reduce cycles spend on ICMP replies that gets rate limited")
> Reported-by: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>

Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks Jesper.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/net/ipv4/icmp.c b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
index 43318b5f5647..9144fa7df2ad 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
@@ -657,8 +657,12 @@  void icmp_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int type, int code, __be32 info)
 	/* Needed by both icmp_global_allow and icmp_xmit_lock */
 	local_bh_disable();
 
-	/* Check global sysctl_icmp_msgs_per_sec ratelimit */
-	if (!icmpv4_global_allow(net, type, code))
+	/* Check global sysctl_icmp_msgs_per_sec ratelimit, unless
+	 * incoming dev is loopback.  If outgoing dev change to not be
+	 * loopback, then peer ratelimit still work (in icmpv4_xrlim_allow)
+	 */
+	if (!(skb_in->dev && (skb_in->dev->flags&IFF_LOOPBACK)) &&
+	      !icmpv4_global_allow(net, type, code))
 		goto out_bh_enable;
 
 	sk = icmp_xmit_lock(net);
diff --git a/net/ipv6/icmp.c b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
index 230b5aac9f03..8d7b113958b1 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@  static void icmp6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info,
 	local_bh_disable();
 
 	/* Check global sysctl_icmp_msgs_per_sec ratelimit */
-	if (!icmpv6_global_allow(type))
+	if (!(skb->dev->flags&IFF_LOOPBACK) && !icmpv6_global_allow(type))
 		goto out_bh_enable;
 
 	mip6_addr_swap(skb);