| Message ID | 20170321000712.26500-7-arnout@mind.be |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
Hello, On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:07:02 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) wrote: > ubus had a hash file, but is says "none" because it is a git download. > Since our git downloads are not reproducible, we can actually add a I guess you meant "are *now* reproducible", right? Ditto for the next commits. No need to resend just for that, it can be fixed up when applying. Thomas
On 21-03-17 10:47, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:07:02 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle > (Essensium/Mind) wrote: >> ubus had a hash file, but is says "none" because it is a git download. >> Since our git downloads are not reproducible, we can actually add a > > I guess you meant "are *now* reproducible", right? Right. Looks like my fingers were quicker than my brains again. > Ditto for the next > commits. Ah, the joys of 'git commit -c HEAD' :-) Regards, Arnout > No need to resend just for that, it can be fixed up when > applying. > > Thomas >
diff --git a/package/ubus/ubus.hash b/package/ubus/ubus.hash index af9b652b0e..4e6a755c7f 100644 --- a/package/ubus/ubus.hash +++ b/package/ubus/ubus.hash @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -# No hash for this git snapshot -none xxx ubus-259450f414d8c9ee41896e8e6d6bc57ec00e2b63.tar.gz +# Locally calculated +sha256 0dbf75c2103f3f567b9bf1bb719ea9776d18401bbf2dfd8bed2c2ebbdd1021da ubus-259450f414d8c9ee41896e8e6d6bc57ec00e2b63.tar.gz
ubus had a hash file, but is says "none" because it is a git download. Since our git downloads are not reproducible, we can actually add a hash. Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be> --- package/ubus/ubus.hash | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)