[net-next] net: qcom/emac: fix a sizeof() typo

We had intended to say "sizeof(u32)" but the "u" is missing.
Fortunately, sizeof(32) is also 4, so the original code still works.

Fixes: c4e7beea2192 ("net: qcom/emac: add ethtool support for reading hardware registers")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Am 13.02.2017 12:00, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> We had intended to say "sizeof(u32)" but the "u" is missing.
> Fortunately, sizeof(32) is also 4, so the original code still works.
> 
> Fixes: c4e7beea2192 ("net: qcom/emac: add ethtool support for reading hardware registers")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/emac/emac-ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/emac/emac-ethtool.c
> index 0d9945fb79be..bbe24639aa5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/emac/emac-ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/emac/emac-ethtool.c
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static void emac_get_regs(struct net_device *netdev,
>  
>  static int emac_get_regs_len(struct net_device *netdev)
>  {
> -	return EMAC_MAX_REG_SIZE * sizeof(32);
> +	return EMAC_MAX_REG_SIZE * sizeof(u32);
>  }
>  


We have a function where the argument is ignored and the rest is const ?

emac_ethtool_get_regs_len seems the only user. So it would be fairly easy to
move that into that function.

@maintainer:
Is there a deeper logic behind this ?


re,
 wh



>  static const struct ethtool_ops emac_ethtool_ops = {
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

walter harms wrote:
> We have a function where the argument is ignored and the rest is const ?
>
> emac_ethtool_get_regs_len seems the only user. So it would be fairly easy to
> move that into that function.
>
> @maintainer:
> Is there a deeper logic behind this ?

I don't understand the question.

The patch is valid (I have no idea how I made that mistake).

Am 13.02.2017 14:03, schrieb Timur Tabi:
> walter harms wrote:
>> We have a function where the argument is ignored and the rest is const ?
>>
>> emac_ethtool_get_regs_len seems the only user. So it would be fairly
>> easy to
>> move that into that function.
>>
>> @maintainer:
>> Is there a deeper logic behind this ?
> 
> I don't understand the question.


The question is: why is a simple calculation const*const
separated into a function ?

re,
 wh

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:55:03PM +0100, walter harms wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 13.02.2017 12:00, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > We had intended to say "sizeof(u32)" but the "u" is missing.
> > Fortunately, sizeof(32) is also 4, so the original code still works.
> > 
> > Fixes: c4e7beea2192 ("net: qcom/emac: add ethtool support for reading hardware registers")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/emac/emac-ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/emac/emac-ethtool.c
> > index 0d9945fb79be..bbe24639aa5a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/emac/emac-ethtool.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/emac/emac-ethtool.c
> > @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static void emac_get_regs(struct net_device *netdev,
> >  
> >  static int emac_get_regs_len(struct net_device *netdev)
> >  {
> > -	return EMAC_MAX_REG_SIZE * sizeof(32);
> > +	return EMAC_MAX_REG_SIZE * sizeof(u32);
> >  }
> >  
> 
> 
> We have a function where the argument is ignored and the rest is const ?
> 
> emac_ethtool_get_regs_len seems the only user. So it would be fairly easy to
> move that into that function.

It's not the only user.  We have to pass netdev because it's used as a
function pointer.

regards,
dan carpenter

walter harms wrote:
> The question is: why is a simple calculation const*const
> separated into a function ?

This is a callback function.  That's just how it's defined.

It's rare, but there are drivers that use the parameter, like this one:

http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlge/qlge_ethtool.c#n591

Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We had intended to say "sizeof(u32)" but the "u" is missing.
> Fortunately, sizeof(32) is also 4, so the original code still works.
>
> Fixes: c4e7beea2192 ("net: qcom/emac: add ethtool support for reading hardware registers")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Acked-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:00:22 +0300

> We had intended to say "sizeof(u32)" but the "u" is missing.
> Fortunately, sizeof(32) is also 4, so the original code still works.
> 
> Fixes: c4e7beea2192 ("net: qcom/emac: add ethtool support for reading hardware registers")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Applied.