| Message ID | 1472634319-11886-1-git-send-email-baoyou.xie@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Deferred |
| Headers | show |
On Wednesday, August 31, 2016 5:05:19 PM CEST Baoyou Xie wrote: > We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1: > drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c:104:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'tegra_xusb_lane_lookup_function' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is > declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. > So this patch marks it 'static'. > > Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Same comment as for the other patch, it's better to use "phy: tegra: ..." in the subject for clarity. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 05:05:19PM +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote: > We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1: > drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c:104:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'tegra_xusb_lane_lookup_function' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is > declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. > So this patch marks it 'static'. > > Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Hi, On Wednesday 31 August 2016 03:31 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday, August 31, 2016 5:05:19 PM CEST Baoyou Xie wrote: >> We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1: >> drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c:104:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'tegra_xusb_lane_lookup_function' [-Wmissing-prototypes] >> >> In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is >> declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. >> So this patch marks it 'static'. >> >> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> >> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > Same comment as for the other patch, it's better to use "phy: tegra: ..." > in the subject for clarity. Fixed it myself and merged this and the other patch. Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c index ec83dfd..0a372d9 100644 --- a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c +++ b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c @@ -101,7 +101,8 @@ tegra_xusb_pad_find_phy_node(struct tegra_xusb_pad *pad, unsigned int index) return of_find_node_by_name(np, pad->soc->lanes[index].name); } -int tegra_xusb_lane_lookup_function(struct tegra_xusb_lane *lane, +static int +tegra_xusb_lane_lookup_function(struct tegra_xusb_lane *lane, const char *function) { unsigned int i;
We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1: drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c:104:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'tegra_xusb_lane_lookup_function' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. So this patch marks it 'static'. Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> --- drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)