diff mbox

[PATCHv2,11/31] ppc: FP exceptions are always precise

Message ID 1469602609-31349-11-git-send-email-benh@kernel.crashing.org
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Benjamin Herrenschmidt July 27, 2016, 6:56 a.m. UTC
We don't implement imprecise FP exceptions and using store_current
which sets SRR1 to the *previous* instruction never makes sense
for these. So let's be truthful and make them precise, which is
allowed by the architecture.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
 target-ppc/excp_helper.c | 11 ++++++-----
 target-ppc/translate.c   |  1 -
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

David Gibson July 27, 2016, 7:21 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 04:56:29PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> We don't implement imprecise FP exceptions and using store_current
> which sets SRR1 to the *previous* instruction never makes sense
> for these. So let's be truthful and make them precise, which is
> allowed by the architecture.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
>  target-ppc/excp_helper.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  target-ppc/translate.c   |  1 -
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c b/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
> index 96c6fd9..02d9e79 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
> @@ -274,12 +274,13 @@ static inline void powerpc_excp(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp_model, int excp)
>                  env->error_code = 0;
>                  return;
>              }
> +
> +            /* FP exceptions always have NIP pointing to the faulting
> +             * instruction, so always use store_next and claim we are
> +             * precise in the MSR.
> +             */
>              msr |= 0x00100000;
> -            if (msr_fe0 == msr_fe1) {
> -                goto store_next;
> -            }
> -            msr |= 0x00010000;
> -            break;
> +            goto store_next;
>          case POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL:
>              LOG_EXCP("Invalid instruction at " TARGET_FMT_lx "\n", env->nip);
>              msr |= 0x00080000;
> diff --git a/target-ppc/translate.c b/target-ppc/translate.c
> index 3cfa40f..ba14bda 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/translate.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/translate.c
> @@ -3060,7 +3060,6 @@ static void gen_conditional_store(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv EA,
>                                    int reg, int size)
>  {
>      TCGv t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> -    uint32_t save_exception = ctx->exception;

This looks like an unrelated change, and one which would break compile
without other changes in gen_conditional_store() that I don't see.

Have you compiled the user-only targets with this change?

>      tcg_gen_st_tl(EA, cpu_env, offsetof(CPUPPCState, reserve_ea));
>      tcg_gen_movi_tl(t0, (size << 5) | reg);
Benjamin Herrenschmidt July 27, 2016, 9:44 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 17:21 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 04:56:29PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt

> wrote:

> > 

> > We don't implement imprecise FP exceptions and using store_current

> > which sets SRR1 to the *previous* instruction never makes sense

> > for these. So let's be truthful and make them precise, which is

> > allowed by the architecture.

> > 

> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

> > ---

> >  target-ppc/excp_helper.c | 11 ++++++-----

> >  target-ppc/translate.c   |  1 -

> >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

> > 

> > diff --git a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c b/target-ppc/excp_helper.c

> > index 96c6fd9..02d9e79 100644

> > --- a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c

> > +++ b/target-ppc/excp_helper.c

> > @@ -274,12 +274,13 @@ static inline void powerpc_excp(PowerPCCPU

> > *cpu, int excp_model, int excp)

> >                  env->error_code = 0;

> >                  return;

> >              }

> > +

> > +            /* FP exceptions always have NIP pointing to the

> > faulting

> > +             * instruction, so always use store_next and claim we

> > are

> > +             * precise in the MSR.

> > +             */

> >              msr |= 0x00100000;

> > -            if (msr_fe0 == msr_fe1) {

> > -                goto store_next;

> > -            }

> > -            msr |= 0x00010000;

> > -            break;

> > +            goto store_next;

> >          case POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL:

> >              LOG_EXCP("Invalid instruction at " TARGET_FMT_lx "\n",

> > env->nip);

> >              msr |= 0x00080000;

> > diff --git a/target-ppc/translate.c b/target-ppc/translate.c

> > index 3cfa40f..ba14bda 100644

> > --- a/target-ppc/translate.c

> > +++ b/target-ppc/translate.c

> > @@ -3060,7 +3060,6 @@ static void

> > gen_conditional_store(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv EA,

> >                                    int reg, int size)

> >  {

> >      TCGv t0 = tcg_temp_new();

> > -    uint32_t save_exception = ctx->exception;

> 

> This looks like an unrelated change, and one which would break

> compile

> without other changes in gen_conditional_store() that I don't see.

> 

> Have you compiled the user-only targets with this change?


Ah yes, the whole series does work in user-only, I tested, it's
just a messup beween 2 commits. The rest of the change is in:

"ppc: Rework NIP updates vs. exception generation"

What happened is that I initially forgot to remove that line
from the above commit, causing a warning. I did a fix, then
folded the fix into the wrong commmit :)

You can either take it out of this commit and put it into the
above mentioned one, or I can do a 3rd spin... but the fix is
trivial.

Cheers,
Ben.

> > 



> >      tcg_gen_st_tl(EA, cpu_env, offsetof(CPUPPCState, reserve_ea));

> >      tcg_gen_movi_tl(t0, (size << 5) | reg);

>
David Gibson July 28, 2016, 12:32 a.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 07:44:26PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 17:21 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 04:56:29PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > We don't implement imprecise FP exceptions and using store_current
> > > which sets SRR1 to the *previous* instruction never makes sense
> > > for these. So let's be truthful and make them precise, which is
> > > allowed by the architecture.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> > > ---
> > >  target-ppc/excp_helper.c | 11 ++++++-----
> > >  target-ppc/translate.c   |  1 -
> > >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c b/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
> > > index 96c6fd9..02d9e79 100644
> > > --- a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
> > > +++ b/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
> > > @@ -274,12 +274,13 @@ static inline void powerpc_excp(PowerPCCPU
> > > *cpu, int excp_model, int excp)
> > >                  env->error_code = 0;
> > >                  return;
> > >              }
> > > +
> > > +            /* FP exceptions always have NIP pointing to the
> > > faulting
> > > +             * instruction, so always use store_next and claim we
> > > are
> > > +             * precise in the MSR.
> > > +             */
> > >              msr |= 0x00100000;
> > > -            if (msr_fe0 == msr_fe1) {
> > > -                goto store_next;
> > > -            }
> > > -            msr |= 0x00010000;
> > > -            break;
> > > +            goto store_next;
> > >          case POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL:
> > >              LOG_EXCP("Invalid instruction at " TARGET_FMT_lx "\n",
> > > env->nip);
> > >              msr |= 0x00080000;
> > > diff --git a/target-ppc/translate.c b/target-ppc/translate.c
> > > index 3cfa40f..ba14bda 100644
> > > --- a/target-ppc/translate.c
> > > +++ b/target-ppc/translate.c
> > > @@ -3060,7 +3060,6 @@ static void
> > > gen_conditional_store(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv EA,
> > >                                    int reg, int size)
> > >  {
> > >      TCGv t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> > > -    uint32_t save_exception = ctx->exception;
> > 
> > This looks like an unrelated change, and one which would break
> > compile
> > without other changes in gen_conditional_store() that I don't see.
> > 
> > Have you compiled the user-only targets with this change?
> 
> Ah yes, the whole series does work in user-only, I tested, it's
> just a messup beween 2 commits. The rest of the change is in:
> 
> "ppc: Rework NIP updates vs. exception generation"
> 
> What happened is that I initially forgot to remove that line
> from the above commit, causing a warning. I did a fix, then
> folded the fix into the wrong commmit :)
> 
> You can either take it out of this commit and put it into the
> above mentioned one, or I can do a 3rd spin... but the fix is
> trivial.

Ok, I've fixed it up in place.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c b/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
index 96c6fd9..02d9e79 100644
--- a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
+++ b/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
@@ -274,12 +274,13 @@  static inline void powerpc_excp(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp_model, int excp)
                 env->error_code = 0;
                 return;
             }
+
+            /* FP exceptions always have NIP pointing to the faulting
+             * instruction, so always use store_next and claim we are
+             * precise in the MSR.
+             */
             msr |= 0x00100000;
-            if (msr_fe0 == msr_fe1) {
-                goto store_next;
-            }
-            msr |= 0x00010000;
-            break;
+            goto store_next;
         case POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL:
             LOG_EXCP("Invalid instruction at " TARGET_FMT_lx "\n", env->nip);
             msr |= 0x00080000;
diff --git a/target-ppc/translate.c b/target-ppc/translate.c
index 3cfa40f..ba14bda 100644
--- a/target-ppc/translate.c
+++ b/target-ppc/translate.c
@@ -3060,7 +3060,6 @@  static void gen_conditional_store(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv EA,
                                   int reg, int size)
 {
     TCGv t0 = tcg_temp_new();
-    uint32_t save_exception = ctx->exception;
 
     tcg_gen_st_tl(EA, cpu_env, offsetof(CPUPPCState, reserve_ea));
     tcg_gen_movi_tl(t0, (size << 5) | reg);