| Message ID | 4C3F557F.3000304@austin.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:37:51 -0500 Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com> wrote: > Split the memory_block struct into a memory_block > struct to cover each sysfs directory and a new memory_block_section > struct for each memory section covered by the sysfs directory. > This change allows for creation of memory sysfs directories that > can span multiple memory sections. > > This can be beneficial in that it can reduce the number of memory > sysfs directories created at boot. This also allows different > architectures to define how many memory sections are covered by > a sysfs directory. > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com> > --- > drivers/base/memory.c | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > include/linux/memory.h | 11 +- > 2 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/memory.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/memory.c 2010-07-15 08:48:41.000000000 -0500 > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/memory.c 2010-07-15 09:55:54.000000000 -0500 > @@ -28,6 +28,14 @@ > #include <asm/uaccess.h> > > #define MEMORY_CLASS_NAME "memory" > +#define MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE (1 << SECTION_SIZE_BITS) > + > +static int sections_per_block; > + > +static inline int base_memory_block_id(int section_nr) > +{ > + return (section_nr / sections_per_block) * sections_per_block; > +} > > static struct sysdev_class memory_sysdev_class = { > .name = MEMORY_CLASS_NAME, > @@ -94,10 +102,9 @@ > } > > static void > -unregister_memory(struct memory_block *memory, struct mem_section *section) > +unregister_memory(struct memory_block *memory) > { > BUG_ON(memory->sysdev.cls != &memory_sysdev_class); > - BUG_ON(memory->sysdev.id != __section_nr(section)); > > /* drop the ref. we got in remove_memory_block() */ > kobject_put(&memory->sysdev.kobj); > @@ -123,13 +130,20 @@ > static ssize_t show_mem_removable(struct sys_device *dev, > struct sysdev_attribute *attr, char *buf) > { > + struct memory_block *mem; > + struct memory_block_section *mbs; > unsigned long start_pfn; > - int ret; > - struct memory_block *mem = > - container_of(dev, struct memory_block, sysdev); > + int ret = 1; > + > + mem = container_of(dev, struct memory_block, sysdev); > + mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); > > - start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->phys_index); > - ret = is_mem_section_removable(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); > + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { > + start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mbs->phys_index); > + ret &= is_mem_section_removable(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); > + } > + > + mutex_unlock(&mem->state_mutex); Hmm, this means memory cab be offlined the while memory block section. Right ? Please write this fact in patch description... And Documentaion/memory_hotplug.txt as "From user's perspective, memory section is not a unit of memory hotplug anymore". And descirbe about a new rule. > return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", ret); > } > > @@ -182,16 +196,16 @@ > * OK to have direct references to sparsemem variables in here. > */ > static int > -memory_block_action(struct memory_block *mem, unsigned long action) > +memory_block_action(struct memory_block_section *mbs, unsigned long action) > { > int i; > unsigned long psection; > unsigned long start_pfn, start_paddr; > struct page *first_page; > int ret; > - int old_state = mem->state; > + int old_state = mbs->state; > > - psection = mem->phys_index; > + psection = mbs->phys_index; > first_page = pfn_to_page(psection << PFN_SECTION_SHIFT); > > /* > @@ -217,18 +231,18 @@ > ret = online_pages(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); > break; > case MEM_OFFLINE: > - mem->state = MEM_GOING_OFFLINE; > + mbs->state = MEM_GOING_OFFLINE; > start_paddr = page_to_pfn(first_page) << PAGE_SHIFT; > ret = remove_memory(start_paddr, > PAGES_PER_SECTION << PAGE_SHIFT); > if (ret) { > - mem->state = old_state; > + mbs->state = old_state; > break; > } > break; > default: > WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "%s(%p, %ld) unknown action: %ld\n", > - __func__, mem, action, action); > + __func__, mbs, action, action); > ret = -EINVAL; > } > > @@ -238,19 +252,34 @@ And please check quilt's diff option. Usual patche in ML shows a function name in any changes, as @@ -241,6 +293,8 @@ static int memory_block_change_state(str Maybe "-p" option is lacked.. > static int memory_block_change_state(struct memory_block *mem, > unsigned long to_state, unsigned long from_state_req) > { > + struct memory_block_section *mbs; > int ret = 0; > + > mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); > > - if (mem->state != from_state_req) { > - ret = -EINVAL; > - goto out; > + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { > + if (mbs->state != from_state_req) > + continue; > + > + ret = memory_block_action(mbs, to_state); > + if (ret) > + break; > + } > + > + if (ret) { > + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { > + if (mbs->state == from_state_req) > + continue; > + > + if (memory_block_action(mbs, to_state)) > + printk(KERN_ERR "Could not re-enable memory " > + "section %lx\n", mbs->phys_index); Why re-enable only ? online->fail->offline never happens ? If so, please add comment at least. BTW, is it guaranteed that all sections under a block has same state after boot ? > + } > } > > - ret = memory_block_action(mem, to_state); > if (!ret) > mem->state = to_state; > > -out: > mutex_unlock(&mem->state_mutex); > return ret; > } > @@ -260,20 +289,15 @@ > struct sysdev_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count) > { > struct memory_block *mem; > - unsigned int phys_section_nr; > int ret = -EINVAL; > > mem = container_of(dev, struct memory_block, sysdev); > - phys_section_nr = mem->phys_index; > - > - if (!present_section_nr(phys_section_nr)) > - goto out; > I'm sorry but I couldn't remember why this check was necessary... > if (!strncmp(buf, "online", min((int)count, 6))) > ret = memory_block_change_state(mem, MEM_ONLINE, MEM_OFFLINE); > else if(!strncmp(buf, "offline", min((int)count, 7))) > ret = memory_block_change_state(mem, MEM_OFFLINE, MEM_ONLINE); > -out: > + > if (ret) > return ret; > return count; > @@ -435,39 +459,6 @@ > return 0; > } > > -static int add_memory_block(int nid, struct mem_section *section, > - unsigned long state, enum mem_add_context context) > -{ > - struct memory_block *mem = kzalloc(sizeof(*mem), GFP_KERNEL); > - unsigned long start_pfn; > - int ret = 0; > - > - if (!mem) > - return -ENOMEM; > - > - mem->phys_index = __section_nr(section); > - mem->state = state; > - mutex_init(&mem->state_mutex); > - start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->phys_index); > - mem->phys_device = arch_get_memory_phys_device(start_pfn); > - > - ret = register_memory(mem, section); > - if (!ret) > - ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, phys_index); > - if (!ret) > - ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, state); > - if (!ret) > - ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, phys_device); > - if (!ret) > - ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, removable); > - if (!ret) { > - if (context == HOTPLUG) > - ret = register_mem_sect_under_node(mem, nid); > - } > - > - return ret; > -} > - I don't say strongly but this kind of move-code should be done in another patch. > /* > * For now, we have a linear search to go find the appropriate > * memory_block corresponding to a particular phys_index. If > @@ -482,12 +473,13 @@ > struct sys_device *sysdev; > struct memory_block *mem; > char name[sizeof(MEMORY_CLASS_NAME) + 9 + 1]; > + int block_id = base_memory_block_id(__section_nr(section)); > > /* > * This only works because we know that section == sysdev->id > * slightly redundant with sysdev_register() > */ > - sprintf(&name[0], "%s%d", MEMORY_CLASS_NAME, __section_nr(section)); > + sprintf(&name[0], "%s%d", MEMORY_CLASS_NAME, block_id); > > kobj = kset_find_obj(&memory_sysdev_class.kset, name); > if (!kobj) > @@ -499,18 +491,98 @@ > return mem; > } > > +static int add_mem_block_section(struct memory_block *mem, > + int section_nr, unsigned long state) > +{ > + struct memory_block_section *mbs; > + > + mbs = kzalloc(sizeof(*mbs), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!mbs) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + mbs->phys_index = section_nr; > + mbs->state = state; > + > + list_add(&mbs->next, &mem->sections); > + return 0; > +} Doesn't this "sections" need to be sorted ? Hmm. > + > +static int add_memory_block(int nid, struct mem_section *section, > + unsigned long state, enum mem_add_context context) > +{ > + struct memory_block *mem; > + int ret = 0; > + > + mem = find_memory_block(section); > + if (!mem) { > + unsigned long start_pfn; > + > + mem = kzalloc(sizeof(*mem), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!mem) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + mem->state = state; > + mutex_init(&mem->state_mutex); > + start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(__section_nr(section)); > + mem->phys_device = arch_get_memory_phys_device(start_pfn); > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mem->sections); > + > + mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); > + > + ret = register_memory(mem, section); > + if (!ret) > + ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, phys_index); > + if (!ret) > + ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, state); > + if (!ret) > + ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, phys_device); > + if (!ret) > + ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, removable); > + if (!ret) { > + if (context == HOTPLUG) > + ret = register_mem_sect_under_node(mem, nid); > + } > + } else { > + kobject_put(&mem->sysdev.kobj); > + mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); > + } > + > + if (!ret) > + ret = add_mem_block_section(mem, __section_nr(section), state); > + > + mutex_unlock(&mem->state_mutex); > + return ret; > +} > + > int remove_memory_block(unsigned long node_id, struct mem_section *section, > int phys_device) > { > struct memory_block *mem; > + struct memory_block_section *mbs, *tmp; > + int section_nr = __section_nr(section); > > mem = find_memory_block(section); > - unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(mem); > - mem_remove_simple_file(mem, phys_index); > - mem_remove_simple_file(mem, state); > - mem_remove_simple_file(mem, phys_device); > - mem_remove_simple_file(mem, removable); > - unregister_memory(mem, section); > + mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); > + > + /* remove the specified section */ > + list_for_each_entry_safe(mbs, tmp, &mem->sections, next) { > + if (mbs->phys_index == section_nr) { > + list_del(&mbs->next); > + kfree(mbs); > + } > + } > + > + mutex_unlock(&mem->state_mutex); > + > + if (list_empty(&mem->sections)) { > + unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(mem); > + mem_remove_simple_file(mem, phys_index); > + mem_remove_simple_file(mem, state); > + mem_remove_simple_file(mem, phys_device); > + mem_remove_simple_file(mem, removable); > + unregister_memory(mem); > + kfree(mem); > + } > > return 0; > } > @@ -532,6 +604,24 @@ > return remove_memory_block(0, section, 0); > } > > +u32 __weak memory_block_size(void) > +{ > + return MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE; > +} > + > +static u32 get_memory_block_size(void) > +{ > + u32 blk_sz; > + > + blk_sz = memory_block_size(); > + > + /* Validate blk_sz is a power of 2 and not less than section size */ > + if ((blk_sz & (blk_sz - 1)) || (blk_sz < MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE)) > + blk_sz = MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE; > + > + return blk_sz; > +} > + > /* > * Initialize the sysfs support for memory devices... > */ > @@ -540,12 +630,16 @@ > unsigned int i; > int ret; > int err; > + int block_sz; > > memory_sysdev_class.kset.uevent_ops = &memory_uevent_ops; > ret = sysdev_class_register(&memory_sysdev_class); > if (ret) > goto out; > > + block_sz = get_memory_block_size(); > + sections_per_block = block_sz / MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE; > + > /* > * Create entries for memory sections that were found > * during boot and have been initialized > Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/memory.h > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/memory.h 2010-07-15 08:48:41.000000000 -0500 > +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/memory.h 2010-07-15 09:54:06.000000000 -0500 > @@ -19,9 +19,15 @@ > #include <linux/node.h> > #include <linux/compiler.h> > #include <linux/mutex.h> > +#include <linux/list.h> > > -struct memory_block { > +struct memory_block_section { > + unsigned long state; > unsigned long phys_index; > + struct list_head next; > +}; > + > +struct memory_block { > unsigned long state; > /* > * This serializes all state change requests. It isn't > @@ -34,6 +40,7 @@ > void *hw; /* optional pointer to fw/hw data */ > int (*phys_callback)(struct memory_block *); > struct sys_device sysdev; > + struct list_head sections; > }; > > int arch_get_memory_phys_device(unsigned long start_pfn); > @@ -113,7 +120,7 @@ > extern int remove_memory_block(unsigned long, struct mem_section *, int); > extern int memory_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); > extern int memory_isolate_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); > -extern struct memory_block *find_memory_block(unsigned long); > +extern struct memory_block *find_memory_block(struct mem_section *); > extern int memory_is_hidden(struct mem_section *); > #define CONFIG_MEM_BLOCK_SIZE (PAGES_PER_SECTION<<PAGE_SHIFT) > enum mem_add_context { BOOT, HOTPLUG }; > Okay, please go ahead. But my 1st impression is that IBM should increase ppc's SECTION_SIZE ;) Thanks, -Kame
Thanks for taking a look a this Kame, answers below... -Nathan On 07/15/2010 07:06 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:37:51 -0500 > Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com> wrote: > >> Split the memory_block struct into a memory_block >> struct to cover each sysfs directory and a new memory_block_section >> struct for each memory section covered by the sysfs directory. >> This change allows for creation of memory sysfs directories that >> can span multiple memory sections. >> >> This can be beneficial in that it can reduce the number of memory >> sysfs directories created at boot. This also allows different >> architectures to define how many memory sections are covered by >> a sysfs directory. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com> >> --- >> drivers/base/memory.c | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- >> include/linux/memory.h | 11 +- >> 2 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) >> >> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/memory.c >> =================================================================== >> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/memory.c 2010-07-15 08:48:41.000000000 -0500 >> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/memory.c 2010-07-15 09:55:54.000000000 -0500 >> @@ -28,6 +28,14 @@ >> #include <asm/uaccess.h> >> >> #define MEMORY_CLASS_NAME "memory" >> +#define MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE (1 << SECTION_SIZE_BITS) >> + >> +static int sections_per_block; >> + >> +static inline int base_memory_block_id(int section_nr) >> +{ >> + return (section_nr / sections_per_block) * sections_per_block; >> +} >> >> static struct sysdev_class memory_sysdev_class = { >> .name = MEMORY_CLASS_NAME, >> @@ -94,10 +102,9 @@ >> } >> >> static void >> -unregister_memory(struct memory_block *memory, struct mem_section *section) >> +unregister_memory(struct memory_block *memory) >> { >> BUG_ON(memory->sysdev.cls != &memory_sysdev_class); >> - BUG_ON(memory->sysdev.id != __section_nr(section)); >> >> /* drop the ref. we got in remove_memory_block() */ >> kobject_put(&memory->sysdev.kobj); >> @@ -123,13 +130,20 @@ >> static ssize_t show_mem_removable(struct sys_device *dev, >> struct sysdev_attribute *attr, char *buf) >> { >> + struct memory_block *mem; >> + struct memory_block_section *mbs; >> unsigned long start_pfn; >> - int ret; >> - struct memory_block *mem = >> - container_of(dev, struct memory_block, sysdev); >> + int ret = 1; >> + >> + mem = container_of(dev, struct memory_block, sysdev); >> + mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); >> >> - start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->phys_index); >> - ret = is_mem_section_removable(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); >> + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { >> + start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mbs->phys_index); >> + ret &= is_mem_section_removable(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); >> + } >> + >> + mutex_unlock(&mem->state_mutex); > > Hmm, this means memory cab be offlined the while memory block section. Right ? > Please write this fact in patch description... > And Documentaion/memory_hotplug.txt as "From user's perspective, memory section > is not a unit of memory hotplug anymore". > And descirbe about a new rule. You are correct. A memory block is removable only if all of the memory sections contained within the memory block are removable. I will include a documentation patch with v3 of the patches to explain this and to explain that memory add/remove operations are done on a per memory block basis. > > >> return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", ret); >> } >> >> @@ -182,16 +196,16 @@ >> * OK to have direct references to sparsemem variables in here. >> */ >> static int >> -memory_block_action(struct memory_block *mem, unsigned long action) >> +memory_block_action(struct memory_block_section *mbs, unsigned long action) >> { >> int i; >> unsigned long psection; >> unsigned long start_pfn, start_paddr; >> struct page *first_page; >> int ret; >> - int old_state = mem->state; >> + int old_state = mbs->state; >> >> - psection = mem->phys_index; >> + psection = mbs->phys_index; >> first_page = pfn_to_page(psection << PFN_SECTION_SHIFT); >> >> /* >> @@ -217,18 +231,18 @@ >> ret = online_pages(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); >> break; >> case MEM_OFFLINE: >> - mem->state = MEM_GOING_OFFLINE; >> + mbs->state = MEM_GOING_OFFLINE; >> start_paddr = page_to_pfn(first_page) << PAGE_SHIFT; >> ret = remove_memory(start_paddr, >> PAGES_PER_SECTION << PAGE_SHIFT); >> if (ret) { >> - mem->state = old_state; >> + mbs->state = old_state; >> break; >> } >> break; >> default: >> WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "%s(%p, %ld) unknown action: %ld\n", >> - __func__, mem, action, action); >> + __func__, mbs, action, action); >> ret = -EINVAL; >> } >> >> @@ -238,19 +252,34 @@ > > And please check quilt's diff option. > Usual patche in ML shows a function name in any changes, as > @@ -241,6 +293,8 @@ static int memory_block_change_state(str > > Maybe "-p" option is lacked.. sorry about that. I'm just using the default options with quilt. I'll play around with it to why this is happening. > > >> static int memory_block_change_state(struct memory_block *mem, >> unsigned long to_state, unsigned long from_state_req) >> { >> + struct memory_block_section *mbs; >> int ret = 0; >> + >> mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); >> >> - if (mem->state != from_state_req) { >> - ret = -EINVAL; >> - goto out; >> + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { >> + if (mbs->state != from_state_req) >> + continue; >> + >> + ret = memory_block_action(mbs, to_state); >> + if (ret) >> + break; >> + } >> + >> + if (ret) { >> + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { >> + if (mbs->state == from_state_req) >> + continue; >> + >> + if (memory_block_action(mbs, to_state)) >> + printk(KERN_ERR "Could not re-enable memory " >> + "section %lx\n", mbs->phys_index); > > Why re-enable only ? online->fail->offline never happens ? > If so, please add comment at least. This should handle both conditions. If we fail to move all of the memory sections to the 'to_state', it puts all of the memory sections back to the 'from_state_req'. > BTW, is it guaranteed that all sections under a block has same state after > boot ? Yes, during boot all memory sections are marked online. > >> + } >> } >> >> - ret = memory_block_action(mem, to_state); >> if (!ret) >> mem->state = to_state; >> >> -out: >> mutex_unlock(&mem->state_mutex); >> return ret; >> } >> @@ -260,20 +289,15 @@ >> struct sysdev_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count) >> { >> struct memory_block *mem; >> - unsigned int phys_section_nr; >> int ret = -EINVAL; >> >> mem = container_of(dev, struct memory_block, sysdev); >> - phys_section_nr = mem->phys_index; >> - >> - if (!present_section_nr(phys_section_nr)) >> - goto out; >> > I'm sorry but I couldn't remember why this check was necessary... Not sure either, it appears that it is there to ensure that the memory section we are trying to act on is actually present. > > > >> if (!strncmp(buf, "online", min((int)count, 6))) >> ret = memory_block_change_state(mem, MEM_ONLINE, MEM_OFFLINE); >> else if(!strncmp(buf, "offline", min((int)count, 7))) >> ret = memory_block_change_state(mem, MEM_OFFLINE, MEM_ONLINE); >> -out: >> + >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> return count; >> @@ -435,39 +459,6 @@ >> return 0; >> } >> >> -static int add_memory_block(int nid, struct mem_section *section, >> - unsigned long state, enum mem_add_context context) >> -{ >> - struct memory_block *mem = kzalloc(sizeof(*mem), GFP_KERNEL); >> - unsigned long start_pfn; >> - int ret = 0; >> - >> - if (!mem) >> - return -ENOMEM; >> - >> - mem->phys_index = __section_nr(section); >> - mem->state = state; >> - mutex_init(&mem->state_mutex); >> - start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->phys_index); >> - mem->phys_device = arch_get_memory_phys_device(start_pfn); >> - >> - ret = register_memory(mem, section); >> - if (!ret) >> - ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, phys_index); >> - if (!ret) >> - ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, state); >> - if (!ret) >> - ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, phys_device); >> - if (!ret) >> - ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, removable); >> - if (!ret) { >> - if (context == HOTPLUG) >> - ret = register_mem_sect_under_node(mem, nid); >> - } >> - >> - return ret; >> -} >> - > > I don't say strongly but this kind of move-code should be done in another patch. ok, I will move the code move piece to a differnet patch. > > >> /* >> * For now, we have a linear search to go find the appropriate >> * memory_block corresponding to a particular phys_index. If >> @@ -482,12 +473,13 @@ >> struct sys_device *sysdev; >> struct memory_block *mem; >> char name[sizeof(MEMORY_CLASS_NAME) + 9 + 1]; >> + int block_id = base_memory_block_id(__section_nr(section)); >> >> /* >> * This only works because we know that section == sysdev->id >> * slightly redundant with sysdev_register() >> */ >> - sprintf(&name[0], "%s%d", MEMORY_CLASS_NAME, __section_nr(section)); >> + sprintf(&name[0], "%s%d", MEMORY_CLASS_NAME, block_id); >> >> kobj = kset_find_obj(&memory_sysdev_class.kset, name); >> if (!kobj) >> @@ -499,18 +491,98 @@ >> return mem; >> } >> >> +static int add_mem_block_section(struct memory_block *mem, >> + int section_nr, unsigned long state) >> +{ >> + struct memory_block_section *mbs; >> + >> + mbs = kzalloc(sizeof(*mbs), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!mbs) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + mbs->phys_index = section_nr; >> + mbs->state = state; >> + >> + list_add(&mbs->next, &mem->sections); >> + return 0; >> +} > > Doesn't this "sections" need to be sorted ? Hmm. We could, but I cannot think of anything we gain by sorting it. > > >> + >> +static int add_memory_block(int nid, struct mem_section *section, >> + unsigned long state, enum mem_add_context context) >> +{ >> + struct memory_block *mem; >> + int ret = 0; >> + >> + mem = find_memory_block(section); >> + if (!mem) { >> + unsigned long start_pfn; >> + >> + mem = kzalloc(sizeof(*mem), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!mem) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + mem->state = state; >> + mutex_init(&mem->state_mutex); >> + start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(__section_nr(section)); >> + mem->phys_device = arch_get_memory_phys_device(start_pfn); >> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mem->sections); >> + >> + mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); >> + >> + ret = register_memory(mem, section); >> + if (!ret) >> + ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, phys_index); >> + if (!ret) >> + ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, state); >> + if (!ret) >> + ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, phys_device); >> + if (!ret) >> + ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, removable); >> + if (!ret) { >> + if (context == HOTPLUG) >> + ret = register_mem_sect_under_node(mem, nid); >> + } >> + } else { >> + kobject_put(&mem->sysdev.kobj); >> + mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); >> + } >> + >> + if (!ret) >> + ret = add_mem_block_section(mem, __section_nr(section), state); >> + >> + mutex_unlock(&mem->state_mutex); >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> int remove_memory_block(unsigned long node_id, struct mem_section *section, >> int phys_device) >> { >> struct memory_block *mem; >> + struct memory_block_section *mbs, *tmp; >> + int section_nr = __section_nr(section); >> >> mem = find_memory_block(section); >> - unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(mem); >> - mem_remove_simple_file(mem, phys_index); >> - mem_remove_simple_file(mem, state); >> - mem_remove_simple_file(mem, phys_device); >> - mem_remove_simple_file(mem, removable); >> - unregister_memory(mem, section); >> + mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); >> + >> + /* remove the specified section */ >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(mbs, tmp, &mem->sections, next) { >> + if (mbs->phys_index == section_nr) { >> + list_del(&mbs->next); >> + kfree(mbs); >> + } >> + } >> + >> + mutex_unlock(&mem->state_mutex); >> + >> + if (list_empty(&mem->sections)) { >> + unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(mem); >> + mem_remove_simple_file(mem, phys_index); >> + mem_remove_simple_file(mem, state); >> + mem_remove_simple_file(mem, phys_device); >> + mem_remove_simple_file(mem, removable); >> + unregister_memory(mem); >> + kfree(mem); >> + } >> >> return 0; >> } >> @@ -532,6 +604,24 @@ >> return remove_memory_block(0, section, 0); >> } >> >> +u32 __weak memory_block_size(void) >> +{ >> + return MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE; >> +} >> + >> +static u32 get_memory_block_size(void) >> +{ >> + u32 blk_sz; >> + >> + blk_sz = memory_block_size(); >> + >> + /* Validate blk_sz is a power of 2 and not less than section size */ >> + if ((blk_sz & (blk_sz - 1)) || (blk_sz < MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE)) >> + blk_sz = MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE; >> + >> + return blk_sz; >> +} >> + >> /* >> * Initialize the sysfs support for memory devices... >> */ >> @@ -540,12 +630,16 @@ >> unsigned int i; >> int ret; >> int err; >> + int block_sz; >> >> memory_sysdev_class.kset.uevent_ops = &memory_uevent_ops; >> ret = sysdev_class_register(&memory_sysdev_class); >> if (ret) >> goto out; >> >> + block_sz = get_memory_block_size(); >> + sections_per_block = block_sz / MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE; >> + >> /* >> * Create entries for memory sections that were found >> * during boot and have been initialized >> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/memory.h >> =================================================================== >> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/memory.h 2010-07-15 08:48:41.000000000 -0500 >> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/memory.h 2010-07-15 09:54:06.000000000 -0500 >> @@ -19,9 +19,15 @@ >> #include <linux/node.h> >> #include <linux/compiler.h> >> #include <linux/mutex.h> >> +#include <linux/list.h> >> >> -struct memory_block { >> +struct memory_block_section { >> + unsigned long state; >> unsigned long phys_index; >> + struct list_head next; >> +}; >> + >> +struct memory_block { >> unsigned long state; >> /* >> * This serializes all state change requests. It isn't >> @@ -34,6 +40,7 @@ >> void *hw; /* optional pointer to fw/hw data */ >> int (*phys_callback)(struct memory_block *); >> struct sys_device sysdev; >> + struct list_head sections; >> }; >> >> int arch_get_memory_phys_device(unsigned long start_pfn); >> @@ -113,7 +120,7 @@ >> extern int remove_memory_block(unsigned long, struct mem_section *, int); >> extern int memory_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); >> extern int memory_isolate_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); >> -extern struct memory_block *find_memory_block(unsigned long); >> +extern struct memory_block *find_memory_block(struct mem_section *); >> extern int memory_is_hidden(struct mem_section *); >> #define CONFIG_MEM_BLOCK_SIZE (PAGES_PER_SECTION<<PAGE_SHIFT) >> enum mem_add_context { BOOT, HOTPLUG }; >> > > Okay, please go ahead. But my 1st impression is that IBM should increase ppc's > SECTION_SIZE ;) > > Thanks, > -Kame > > > >
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 13:37 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote: > @@ -123,13 +130,20 @@ > static ssize_t show_mem_removable(struct sys_device *dev, > struct sysdev_attribute *attr, char *buf) > { > + struct memory_block *mem; > + struct memory_block_section *mbs; > unsigned long start_pfn; > - int ret; > - struct memory_block *mem = > - container_of(dev, struct memory_block, sysdev); > + int ret = 1; > + > + mem = container_of(dev, struct memory_block, sysdev); > + mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); > > - start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->phys_index); > - ret = is_mem_section_removable(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); > + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { > + start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mbs->phys_index); > + ret &= is_mem_section_removable(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); > + } > + > + mutex_unlock(&mem->state_mutex); > return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", ret); > } Now that the "state_mutex" is getting used for other stuff, should we just make it "mutex"? > @@ -182,16 +196,16 @@ > * OK to have direct references to sparsemem variables in here. > */ > static int > -memory_block_action(struct memory_block *mem, unsigned long action) > +memory_block_action(struct memory_block_section *mbs, unsigned long action) > { > int i; > unsigned long psection; > unsigned long start_pfn, start_paddr; > struct page *first_page; > int ret; > - int old_state = mem->state; > + int old_state = mbs->state; > > - psection = mem->phys_index; > + psection = mbs->phys_index; > first_page = pfn_to_page(psection << PFN_SECTION_SHIFT); > > /* > @@ -217,18 +231,18 @@ > ret = online_pages(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); > break; > case MEM_OFFLINE: > - mem->state = MEM_GOING_OFFLINE; > + mbs->state = MEM_GOING_OFFLINE; > start_paddr = page_to_pfn(first_page) << PAGE_SHIFT; > ret = remove_memory(start_paddr, > PAGES_PER_SECTION << PAGE_SHIFT); > if (ret) { > - mem->state = old_state; > + mbs->state = old_state; > break; > } > break; > default: > WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "%s(%p, %ld) unknown action: %ld\n", > - __func__, mem, action, action); > + __func__, mbs, action, action); > ret = -EINVAL; > } > > @@ -238,19 +252,34 @@ > static int memory_block_change_state(struct memory_block *mem, > unsigned long to_state, unsigned long from_state_req) > { > + struct memory_block_section *mbs; > int ret = 0; > + > mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); > > - if (mem->state != from_state_req) { > - ret = -EINVAL; > - goto out; > + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { > + if (mbs->state != from_state_req) > + continue; > + > + ret = memory_block_action(mbs, to_state); > + if (ret) > + break; > + } > + > + if (ret) { > + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { > + if (mbs->state == from_state_req) > + continue; > + > + if (memory_block_action(mbs, to_state)) > + printk(KERN_ERR "Could not re-enable memory " > + "section %lx\n", mbs->phys_index); > + } > } Please just use a goto here. It's nicer looking, and much more in line with what's there already. ... > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/memory.h 2010-07-15 08:48:41.000000000 -0500 > +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/memory.h 2010-07-15 09:54:06.000000000 -0500 > @@ -19,9 +19,15 @@ > #include <linux/node.h> > #include <linux/compiler.h> > #include <linux/mutex.h> > +#include <linux/list.h> > > -struct memory_block { > +struct memory_block_section { > + unsigned long state; > unsigned long phys_index; > + struct list_head next; > +}; > + > +struct memory_block { > unsigned long state; > /* > * This serializes all state change requests. It isn't > @@ -34,6 +40,7 @@ > void *hw; /* optional pointer to fw/hw data */ > int (*phys_callback)(struct memory_block *); > struct sys_device sysdev; > + struct list_head sections; > }; It looks like we have state in both the memory_block and memory_block_section. That seems a bit confusing to me. This also looks like it would permit non-contiguous memory_block_sections in a memory_block. Is that what you intended? If the memory_block's state was inferred to be the same as each memory_block_section, couldn't we just keep a start and end phys_index in the memory_block, and get away from having memory_block_sections at all? -- Dave
On 07/16/2010 12:15 PM, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 13:37 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote: >> @@ -123,13 +130,20 @@ >> static ssize_t show_mem_removable(struct sys_device *dev, >> struct sysdev_attribute *attr, char *buf) >> { >> + struct memory_block *mem; >> + struct memory_block_section *mbs; >> unsigned long start_pfn; >> - int ret; >> - struct memory_block *mem = >> - container_of(dev, struct memory_block, sysdev); >> + int ret = 1; >> + >> + mem = container_of(dev, struct memory_block, sysdev); >> + mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); >> >> - start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->phys_index); >> - ret = is_mem_section_removable(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); >> + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { >> + start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mbs->phys_index); >> + ret &= is_mem_section_removable(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); >> + } >> + >> + mutex_unlock(&mem->state_mutex); >> return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", ret); >> } > > Now that the "state_mutex" is getting used for other stuff, should we > just make it "mutex"? > >> @@ -182,16 +196,16 @@ >> * OK to have direct references to sparsemem variables in here. >> */ >> static int >> -memory_block_action(struct memory_block *mem, unsigned long action) >> +memory_block_action(struct memory_block_section *mbs, unsigned long action) >> { >> int i; >> unsigned long psection; >> unsigned long start_pfn, start_paddr; >> struct page *first_page; >> int ret; >> - int old_state = mem->state; >> + int old_state = mbs->state; >> >> - psection = mem->phys_index; >> + psection = mbs->phys_index; >> first_page = pfn_to_page(psection << PFN_SECTION_SHIFT); >> >> /* >> @@ -217,18 +231,18 @@ >> ret = online_pages(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); >> break; >> case MEM_OFFLINE: >> - mem->state = MEM_GOING_OFFLINE; >> + mbs->state = MEM_GOING_OFFLINE; >> start_paddr = page_to_pfn(first_page) << PAGE_SHIFT; >> ret = remove_memory(start_paddr, >> PAGES_PER_SECTION << PAGE_SHIFT); >> if (ret) { >> - mem->state = old_state; >> + mbs->state = old_state; >> break; >> } >> break; >> default: >> WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "%s(%p, %ld) unknown action: %ld\n", >> - __func__, mem, action, action); >> + __func__, mbs, action, action); >> ret = -EINVAL; >> } >> >> @@ -238,19 +252,34 @@ >> static int memory_block_change_state(struct memory_block *mem, >> unsigned long to_state, unsigned long from_state_req) >> { >> + struct memory_block_section *mbs; >> int ret = 0; >> + >> mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); >> >> - if (mem->state != from_state_req) { >> - ret = -EINVAL; >> - goto out; >> + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { >> + if (mbs->state != from_state_req) >> + continue; >> + >> + ret = memory_block_action(mbs, to_state); >> + if (ret) >> + break; >> + } >> + >> + if (ret) { >> + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { >> + if (mbs->state == from_state_req) >> + continue; >> + >> + if (memory_block_action(mbs, to_state)) >> + printk(KERN_ERR "Could not re-enable memory " >> + "section %lx\n", mbs->phys_index); >> + } >> } > > Please just use a goto here. It's nicer looking, and much more in line > with what's there already. Not sure if I follow on where you want the goto. If you mean after the if (memory_block_action())... I purposely did not have a goto here. Since this is in the recovery path I wanted to make sure we tried to return every memory section to the original state. > > ... >> =================================================================== >> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/memory.h 2010-07-15 08:48:41.000000000 -0500 >> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/memory.h 2010-07-15 09:54:06.000000000 -0500 >> @@ -19,9 +19,15 @@ >> #include <linux/node.h> >> #include <linux/compiler.h> >> #include <linux/mutex.h> >> +#include <linux/list.h> >> >> -struct memory_block { >> +struct memory_block_section { >> + unsigned long state; >> unsigned long phys_index; >> + struct list_head next; >> +}; >> + >> +struct memory_block { >> unsigned long state; >> /* >> * This serializes all state change requests. It isn't >> @@ -34,6 +40,7 @@ >> void *hw; /* optional pointer to fw/hw data */ >> int (*phys_callback)(struct memory_block *); >> struct sys_device sysdev; >> + struct list_head sections; >> }; > > It looks like we have state in both the memory_block and > memory_block_section. That seems a bit confusing to me. This also > looks like it would permit non-contiguous memory_block_sections in a > memory_block. Is that what you intended? The two state fields are a bit confusing, perhaps slightly different names, block_state and section_state. The reason for two state fileds is that memory online/offline is done on a memory block and an entire memory block is considered online or offline. The state field in the memory_block_section is used to track the state of each of the memory sections as you work through onlining or offlining the entire block so that if an error occurs we can return each memory section to its original state. You're correct that there is nothing that prevents non-contiguous memory sections in a memory block. It was not my intention to have this, but looking at the patches there is nothing to prevent it. > > If the memory_block's state was inferred to be the same as each > memory_block_section, couldn't we just keep a start and end phys_index > in the memory_block, and get away from having memory_block_sections at > all? Oooohhh... I like. Looking at the code it appears this is possible. I'll try this out and include it in the next version of the patch. Do you think we need to add an additional file to each memory block directory to indicate the number of memory sections in the memory block that are actually present? -Nathan
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 13:23 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote: > > If the memory_block's state was inferred to be the same as each > > memory_block_section, couldn't we just keep a start and end phys_index > > in the memory_block, and get away from having memory_block_sections at > > all? > > Oooohhh... I like. Looking at the code it appears this is possible. I'll > try this out and include it in the next version of the patch. > > Do you think we need to add an additional file to each memory block directory > to indicate the number of memory sections in the memory block that are actually > present? I think it's easiest to just say that each 'memory_block' can only hold contiguous 'memory_block_sections', and we give either the start/end or start/length pairs. It gets a lot more complicated if we have to deal with lots of holes. I can just see the hardware designers reading this thread, with their Dr. Evil laughs trying to come up with a reason to give us a couple of terabytes of RAM with only every-other 16MB area populated. :) -- Dave
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 13:23 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote: > >> - if (mem->state != from_state_req) { > >> - ret = -EINVAL; > >> - goto out; > >> + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { > >> + if (mbs->state != from_state_req) > >> + continue; > >> + > >> + ret = memory_block_action(mbs, to_state); > >> + if (ret) > >> + break; > >> + } > >> + > >> + if (ret) { > >> + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { > >> + if (mbs->state == from_state_req) > >> + continue; > >> + > >> + if (memory_block_action(mbs, to_state)) > >> + printk(KERN_ERR "Could not re-enable memory " > >> + "section %lx\n", mbs->phys_index); > >> + } > >> } > > > > Please just use a goto here. It's nicer looking, and much more in line > > with what's there already. > > Not sure if I follow on where you want the goto. If you mean after the > if (memory_block_action())... I purposely did not have a goto here. > Since this is in the recovery path I wanted to make sure we tried to return > every memory section to the original state. Looking at it a little closer, I see what you're doing now. First of all, should memory_block_action() get a new name since it isn not taking 'memory_block_section's? The thing I would have liked to see is to have that error handling block out of the way a bit. But, the function is small, and there's not _too_ much code in there, so what you have is probably the best way to do it. Minor nit: Please pull the memory_block_action() out of the if() and do the: > >> + ret = memory_block_action(mbs, to_state); > >> + if (ret) > >> + break; thing like above. It makes it much more obvious that the loop is related to the top one. I was thinking if it made sense to have a helper function to go through and do that list walk, so you could do: ret = set_all_states(mem->sections, to_state); if (ret) set_all_states(mem->sections, old_state); But I think you'd need to pass in a bit more information, so it probably isn't worth doing that, either. -- Dave
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/memory.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/memory.c 2010-07-15 08:48:41.000000000 -0500 +++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/memory.c 2010-07-15 09:55:54.000000000 -0500 @@ -28,6 +28,14 @@ #include <asm/uaccess.h> #define MEMORY_CLASS_NAME "memory" +#define MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE (1 << SECTION_SIZE_BITS) + +static int sections_per_block; + +static inline int base_memory_block_id(int section_nr) +{ + return (section_nr / sections_per_block) * sections_per_block; +} static struct sysdev_class memory_sysdev_class = { .name = MEMORY_CLASS_NAME, @@ -94,10 +102,9 @@ } static void -unregister_memory(struct memory_block *memory, struct mem_section *section) +unregister_memory(struct memory_block *memory) { BUG_ON(memory->sysdev.cls != &memory_sysdev_class); - BUG_ON(memory->sysdev.id != __section_nr(section)); /* drop the ref. we got in remove_memory_block() */ kobject_put(&memory->sysdev.kobj); @@ -123,13 +130,20 @@ static ssize_t show_mem_removable(struct sys_device *dev, struct sysdev_attribute *attr, char *buf) { + struct memory_block *mem; + struct memory_block_section *mbs; unsigned long start_pfn; - int ret; - struct memory_block *mem = - container_of(dev, struct memory_block, sysdev); + int ret = 1; + + mem = container_of(dev, struct memory_block, sysdev); + mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); - start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->phys_index); - ret = is_mem_section_removable(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { + start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mbs->phys_index); + ret &= is_mem_section_removable(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); + } + + mutex_unlock(&mem->state_mutex); return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", ret); } @@ -182,16 +196,16 @@ * OK to have direct references to sparsemem variables in here. */ static int -memory_block_action(struct memory_block *mem, unsigned long action) +memory_block_action(struct memory_block_section *mbs, unsigned long action) { int i; unsigned long psection; unsigned long start_pfn, start_paddr; struct page *first_page; int ret; - int old_state = mem->state; + int old_state = mbs->state; - psection = mem->phys_index; + psection = mbs->phys_index; first_page = pfn_to_page(psection << PFN_SECTION_SHIFT); /* @@ -217,18 +231,18 @@ ret = online_pages(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); break; case MEM_OFFLINE: - mem->state = MEM_GOING_OFFLINE; + mbs->state = MEM_GOING_OFFLINE; start_paddr = page_to_pfn(first_page) << PAGE_SHIFT; ret = remove_memory(start_paddr, PAGES_PER_SECTION << PAGE_SHIFT); if (ret) { - mem->state = old_state; + mbs->state = old_state; break; } break; default: WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "%s(%p, %ld) unknown action: %ld\n", - __func__, mem, action, action); + __func__, mbs, action, action); ret = -EINVAL; } @@ -238,19 +252,34 @@ static int memory_block_change_state(struct memory_block *mem, unsigned long to_state, unsigned long from_state_req) { + struct memory_block_section *mbs; int ret = 0; + mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); - if (mem->state != from_state_req) { - ret = -EINVAL; - goto out; + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { + if (mbs->state != from_state_req) + continue; + + ret = memory_block_action(mbs, to_state); + if (ret) + break; + } + + if (ret) { + list_for_each_entry(mbs, &mem->sections, next) { + if (mbs->state == from_state_req) + continue; + + if (memory_block_action(mbs, to_state)) + printk(KERN_ERR "Could not re-enable memory " + "section %lx\n", mbs->phys_index); + } } - ret = memory_block_action(mem, to_state); if (!ret) mem->state = to_state; -out: mutex_unlock(&mem->state_mutex); return ret; } @@ -260,20 +289,15 @@ struct sysdev_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count) { struct memory_block *mem; - unsigned int phys_section_nr; int ret = -EINVAL; mem = container_of(dev, struct memory_block, sysdev); - phys_section_nr = mem->phys_index; - - if (!present_section_nr(phys_section_nr)) - goto out; if (!strncmp(buf, "online", min((int)count, 6))) ret = memory_block_change_state(mem, MEM_ONLINE, MEM_OFFLINE); else if(!strncmp(buf, "offline", min((int)count, 7))) ret = memory_block_change_state(mem, MEM_OFFLINE, MEM_ONLINE); -out: + if (ret) return ret; return count; @@ -435,39 +459,6 @@ return 0; } -static int add_memory_block(int nid, struct mem_section *section, - unsigned long state, enum mem_add_context context) -{ - struct memory_block *mem = kzalloc(sizeof(*mem), GFP_KERNEL); - unsigned long start_pfn; - int ret = 0; - - if (!mem) - return -ENOMEM; - - mem->phys_index = __section_nr(section); - mem->state = state; - mutex_init(&mem->state_mutex); - start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->phys_index); - mem->phys_device = arch_get_memory_phys_device(start_pfn); - - ret = register_memory(mem, section); - if (!ret) - ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, phys_index); - if (!ret) - ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, state); - if (!ret) - ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, phys_device); - if (!ret) - ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, removable); - if (!ret) { - if (context == HOTPLUG) - ret = register_mem_sect_under_node(mem, nid); - } - - return ret; -} - /* * For now, we have a linear search to go find the appropriate * memory_block corresponding to a particular phys_index. If @@ -482,12 +473,13 @@ struct sys_device *sysdev; struct memory_block *mem; char name[sizeof(MEMORY_CLASS_NAME) + 9 + 1]; + int block_id = base_memory_block_id(__section_nr(section)); /* * This only works because we know that section == sysdev->id * slightly redundant with sysdev_register() */ - sprintf(&name[0], "%s%d", MEMORY_CLASS_NAME, __section_nr(section)); + sprintf(&name[0], "%s%d", MEMORY_CLASS_NAME, block_id); kobj = kset_find_obj(&memory_sysdev_class.kset, name); if (!kobj) @@ -499,18 +491,98 @@ return mem; } +static int add_mem_block_section(struct memory_block *mem, + int section_nr, unsigned long state) +{ + struct memory_block_section *mbs; + + mbs = kzalloc(sizeof(*mbs), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!mbs) + return -ENOMEM; + + mbs->phys_index = section_nr; + mbs->state = state; + + list_add(&mbs->next, &mem->sections); + return 0; +} + +static int add_memory_block(int nid, struct mem_section *section, + unsigned long state, enum mem_add_context context) +{ + struct memory_block *mem; + int ret = 0; + + mem = find_memory_block(section); + if (!mem) { + unsigned long start_pfn; + + mem = kzalloc(sizeof(*mem), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!mem) + return -ENOMEM; + + mem->state = state; + mutex_init(&mem->state_mutex); + start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(__section_nr(section)); + mem->phys_device = arch_get_memory_phys_device(start_pfn); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mem->sections); + + mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); + + ret = register_memory(mem, section); + if (!ret) + ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, phys_index); + if (!ret) + ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, state); + if (!ret) + ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, phys_device); + if (!ret) + ret = mem_create_simple_file(mem, removable); + if (!ret) { + if (context == HOTPLUG) + ret = register_mem_sect_under_node(mem, nid); + } + } else { + kobject_put(&mem->sysdev.kobj); + mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); + } + + if (!ret) + ret = add_mem_block_section(mem, __section_nr(section), state); + + mutex_unlock(&mem->state_mutex); + return ret; +} + int remove_memory_block(unsigned long node_id, struct mem_section *section, int phys_device) { struct memory_block *mem; + struct memory_block_section *mbs, *tmp; + int section_nr = __section_nr(section); mem = find_memory_block(section); - unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(mem); - mem_remove_simple_file(mem, phys_index); - mem_remove_simple_file(mem, state); - mem_remove_simple_file(mem, phys_device); - mem_remove_simple_file(mem, removable); - unregister_memory(mem, section); + mutex_lock(&mem->state_mutex); + + /* remove the specified section */ + list_for_each_entry_safe(mbs, tmp, &mem->sections, next) { + if (mbs->phys_index == section_nr) { + list_del(&mbs->next); + kfree(mbs); + } + } + + mutex_unlock(&mem->state_mutex); + + if (list_empty(&mem->sections)) { + unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(mem); + mem_remove_simple_file(mem, phys_index); + mem_remove_simple_file(mem, state); + mem_remove_simple_file(mem, phys_device); + mem_remove_simple_file(mem, removable); + unregister_memory(mem); + kfree(mem); + } return 0; } @@ -532,6 +604,24 @@ return remove_memory_block(0, section, 0); } +u32 __weak memory_block_size(void) +{ + return MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE; +} + +static u32 get_memory_block_size(void) +{ + u32 blk_sz; + + blk_sz = memory_block_size(); + + /* Validate blk_sz is a power of 2 and not less than section size */ + if ((blk_sz & (blk_sz - 1)) || (blk_sz < MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE)) + blk_sz = MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE; + + return blk_sz; +} + /* * Initialize the sysfs support for memory devices... */ @@ -540,12 +630,16 @@ unsigned int i; int ret; int err; + int block_sz; memory_sysdev_class.kset.uevent_ops = &memory_uevent_ops; ret = sysdev_class_register(&memory_sysdev_class); if (ret) goto out; + block_sz = get_memory_block_size(); + sections_per_block = block_sz / MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE; + /* * Create entries for memory sections that were found * during boot and have been initialized Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/memory.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/memory.h 2010-07-15 08:48:41.000000000 -0500 +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/memory.h 2010-07-15 09:54:06.000000000 -0500 @@ -19,9 +19,15 @@ #include <linux/node.h> #include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/list.h> -struct memory_block { +struct memory_block_section { + unsigned long state; unsigned long phys_index; + struct list_head next; +}; + +struct memory_block { unsigned long state; /* * This serializes all state change requests. It isn't @@ -34,6 +40,7 @@ void *hw; /* optional pointer to fw/hw data */ int (*phys_callback)(struct memory_block *); struct sys_device sysdev; + struct list_head sections; }; int arch_get_memory_phys_device(unsigned long start_pfn); @@ -113,7 +120,7 @@ extern int remove_memory_block(unsigned long, struct mem_section *, int); extern int memory_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); extern int memory_isolate_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); -extern struct memory_block *find_memory_block(unsigned long); +extern struct memory_block *find_memory_block(struct mem_section *); extern int memory_is_hidden(struct mem_section *); #define CONFIG_MEM_BLOCK_SIZE (PAGES_PER_SECTION<<PAGE_SHIFT) enum mem_add_context { BOOT, HOTPLUG };
Split the memory_block struct into a memory_block struct to cover each sysfs directory and a new memory_block_section struct for each memory section covered by the sysfs directory. This change allows for creation of memory sysfs directories that can span multiple memory sections. This can be beneficial in that it can reduce the number of memory sysfs directories created at boot. This also allows different architectures to define how many memory sections are covered by a sysfs directory. Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com> --- drivers/base/memory.c | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- include/linux/memory.h | 11 +- 2 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)