@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-@c markers: CROSSREF BUG TODO
+@c markers: BUG TODO
@c Copyright (C) 1988, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,
@c 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 Free Software
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ where near complete.
The language front end is invoked only once, via
@code{lang_hooks.parse_file}, to parse the entire input. The language
front end may use any intermediate language representation deemed
-appropriate. The C front end uses GENERIC trees (CROSSREF), plus
+appropriate. The C front end uses GENERIC trees (@pxref{GENERIC}), plus
a double handful of language specific tree codes defined in
@file{c-common.def}. The Fortran front end uses a completely different
private representation.
@@ -46,10 +46,9 @@ private representation.
At some point the front end must translate the representation used in the
front end to a representation understood by the language-independent
portions of the compiler. Current practice takes one of two forms.
-The C front end manually invokes the gimplifier (CROSSREF) on each function,
+The C front end manually invokes the gimplifier (@pxref{GIMPLE}) on each function,
and uses the gimplifier callbacks to convert the language-specific tree
-nodes directly to GIMPLE (CROSSREF) before passing the function off to
-be compiled.
+nodes directly to GIMPLE before passing the function off to be compiled.
The Fortran front end converts from a private representation to GENERIC,
which is later lowered to GIMPLE when the function is compiled. Which
route to choose probably depends on how well GENERIC (plus extensions)
@@ -111,7 +110,7 @@ definitions immediately or queue them fo
@cindex GIMPLE
@dfn{Gimplification} is a whimsical term for the process of converting
the intermediate representation of a function into the GIMPLE language
-(CROSSREF). The term stuck, and so words like ``gimplification'',
+(@pxref{GIMPLE}). The term stuck, and so words like ``gimplification'',
``gimplify'', ``gimplifier'' and the like are sprinkled throughout this
section of code.
From: "Dennis, CHENG Renquan" <crquan@fedoraproject.org> Hi, all, I'm new to Gcc hacking world, while reading these documentation (GCC Internals), found some places like this passes.texi may be unfinished, especially the places marked as CROSSREF, BUG, and TODO should be, right? I am trying to finish some parts in a series of patches; please give comments for anywhere I may be wrong; Thanks, -- Git 1.7.1.1 CHENG Renquan 38 St Thomas Walk, Singapore 238118 http://crquan.fedorapeople.org