diff mbox

[03/10] target-i386: cpu: move xcc->kvm_required check to realize time

Message ID 20160609183430.GC17952@thinpad.lan.raisama.net
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Eduardo Habkost June 9, 2016, 6:34 p.m. UTC
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:16:45PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> it will allow to drop custom cpu_x86_init() and use
> cpu_generic_init() insteadi, reducing cpu_x86_create()
> to a simple 3-liner.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>

This triggers an assert when trying to use -cpu host with TCG:

  # ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -machine accel=tcg -cpu host -nographic
  qemu-system-x86_64: /root/qemu/target-i386/cpu.c:1558: host_x86_cpu_initfn: Assertion `(kvm_allowed)' failed.
  Aborted

I will squash the following fix in it:

Comments

Igor Mammedov June 10, 2016, 7:15 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 15:34:30 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:16:45PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > it will allow to drop custom cpu_x86_init() and use
> > cpu_generic_init() insteadi, reducing cpu_x86_create()
> > to a simple 3-liner.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> > Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>  
> 
> This triggers an assert when trying to use -cpu host with TCG:
> 
>   # ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -machine accel=tcg -cpu host -nographic
>   qemu-system-x86_64: /root/qemu/target-i386/cpu.c:1558: host_x86_cpu_initfn: Assertion `(kvm_allowed)' failed.
>   Aborted
This is not related to this patch and it was there before.

Maybe a separate patch saying that it replaces assert() in
host_x86_cpu_initfn() with error check and user friendly
error message at later stage.

> 
> I will squash the following fix in it:
> 
> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
> index 3f886a5..dcbfa0b 100644
> --- a/target-i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
> @@ -1555,16 +1555,17 @@ static void host_x86_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
>      CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
>      KVMState *s = kvm_state;
>  
> -    assert(kvm_enabled());
> -
>      /* We can't fill the features array here because we don't know yet if
>       * "migratable" is true or false.
>       */
>      cpu->host_features = true;
>  
> -    env->cpuid_level = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x0, 0, R_EAX);
> -    env->cpuid_xlevel = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x80000000, 0, R_EAX);
> -    env->cpuid_xlevel2 = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0xC0000000, 0, R_EAX);
> +    /* If KVM is disabled, x86_cpu_realizefn() will report an error later */
> +    if (kvm_enabled()) {
> +        env->cpuid_level = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x0, 0, R_EAX);
> +        env->cpuid_xlevel = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x80000000, 0, R_EAX);
> +        env->cpuid_xlevel2 = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0xC0000000, 0, R_EAX);
> +    }
>  
>      object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(cpu), true, "pmu", &error_abort);
>  }
>
Eduardo Habkost June 10, 2016, 11:39 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 09:15:44AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 15:34:30 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:16:45PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > it will allow to drop custom cpu_x86_init() and use
> > > cpu_generic_init() insteadi, reducing cpu_x86_create()
> > > to a simple 3-liner.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> > > Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>  
> > 
> > This triggers an assert when trying to use -cpu host with TCG:
> > 
> >   # ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -machine accel=tcg -cpu host -nographic
> >   qemu-system-x86_64: /root/qemu/target-i386/cpu.c:1558: host_x86_cpu_initfn: Assertion `(kvm_allowed)' failed.
> >   Aborted
> This is not related to this patch and it was there before.

It is caused by this patch. The assert() was there, but you
removed the check on cpu_x86_create() that prevented it from
being triggered.

> 
> Maybe a separate patch saying that it replaces assert() in
> host_x86_cpu_initfn() with error check and user friendly
> error message at later stage.

We could apply the fix below as a separate patch before 03/10, or
just squash the fix in it. What do you think? (We can't do it as
a follow-up patch.)

If you prefer to suggest another fix, I will remove the series
from x86-next and wait for v3.

> 
> > 
> > I will squash the following fix in it:
> > 
> > diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
> > index 3f886a5..dcbfa0b 100644
> > --- a/target-i386/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
> > @@ -1555,16 +1555,17 @@ static void host_x86_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
> >      CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
> >      KVMState *s = kvm_state;
> >  
> > -    assert(kvm_enabled());
> > -
> >      /* We can't fill the features array here because we don't know yet if
> >       * "migratable" is true or false.
> >       */
> >      cpu->host_features = true;
> >  
> > -    env->cpuid_level = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x0, 0, R_EAX);
> > -    env->cpuid_xlevel = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x80000000, 0, R_EAX);
> > -    env->cpuid_xlevel2 = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0xC0000000, 0, R_EAX);
> > +    /* If KVM is disabled, x86_cpu_realizefn() will report an error later */
> > +    if (kvm_enabled()) {
> > +        env->cpuid_level = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x0, 0, R_EAX);
> > +        env->cpuid_xlevel = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x80000000, 0, R_EAX);
> > +        env->cpuid_xlevel2 = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0xC0000000, 0, R_EAX);
> > +    }
> >  
> >      object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(cpu), true, "pmu", &error_abort);
> >  }
> > 
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
index 3f886a5..dcbfa0b 100644
--- a/target-i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
@@ -1555,16 +1555,17 @@  static void host_x86_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
     CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
     KVMState *s = kvm_state;
 
-    assert(kvm_enabled());
-
     /* We can't fill the features array here because we don't know yet if
      * "migratable" is true or false.
      */
     cpu->host_features = true;
 
-    env->cpuid_level = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x0, 0, R_EAX);
-    env->cpuid_xlevel = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x80000000, 0, R_EAX);
-    env->cpuid_xlevel2 = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0xC0000000, 0, R_EAX);
+    /* If KVM is disabled, x86_cpu_realizefn() will report an error later */
+    if (kvm_enabled()) {
+        env->cpuid_level = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x0, 0, R_EAX);
+        env->cpuid_xlevel = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x80000000, 0, R_EAX);
+        env->cpuid_xlevel2 = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0xC0000000, 0, R_EAX);
+    }
 
     object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(cpu), true, "pmu", &error_abort);
 }