Message ID | 20150706090759.GS11824@pengutronix.de |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Hello Linus, hello Alexandre, On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:07:59AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > now that all patches that were in next hit Linus Torvalds' tree and > v4.2-rc1 is out here comes the promised pull request that makes usage of > the flags parameter mandatory for gpiod_get et al: > > The following changes since commit d770e558e21961ad6cfdf0ff7df0eb5d7d4f0754: > > Linux 4.2-rc1 (2015-07-05 11:01:52 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux.git tags/gpiod-flags-for-4.3 > > for you to fetch changes up to b17d1bf16cc72a374a48d748940f700009d40ff4: > > gpio: make flags mandatory for gpiod_get functions (2015-07-06 10:39:24 +0200) gentle ping! Best regards Uwe
Hello Linus, hello Alexandre, On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 12:51:38PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:07:59AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > now that all patches that were in next hit Linus Torvalds' tree and > > v4.2-rc1 is out here comes the promised pull request that makes usage of > > the flags parameter mandatory for gpiod_get et al: > > > > The following changes since commit d770e558e21961ad6cfdf0ff7df0eb5d7d4f0754: > > > > Linux 4.2-rc1 (2015-07-05 11:01:52 -0700) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux.git tags/gpiod-flags-for-4.3 > > > > for you to fetch changes up to b17d1bf16cc72a374a48d748940f700009d40ff4: > > > > gpio: make flags mandatory for gpiod_get functions (2015-07-06 10:39:24 +0200) > gentle ping! the (or at least my) plan was to get this into next early after the merge window for 4.2 closes. Now we're already at -rc2. Can you please comment? As of next-20150715 there don't seem to be any new users of gpiod without flags btw. Best regards Uwe
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote: > Hello Linus, hello Alexandre, > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 12:51:38PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:07:59AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >> > now that all patches that were in next hit Linus Torvalds' tree and >> > v4.2-rc1 is out here comes the promised pull request that makes usage of >> > the flags parameter mandatory for gpiod_get et al: >> > >> > The following changes since commit d770e558e21961ad6cfdf0ff7df0eb5d7d4f0754: >> > >> > Linux 4.2-rc1 (2015-07-05 11:01:52 -0700) >> > >> > are available in the git repository at: >> > >> > git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux.git tags/gpiod-flags-for-4.3 >> > >> > for you to fetch changes up to b17d1bf16cc72a374a48d748940f700009d40ff4: >> > >> > gpio: make flags mandatory for gpiod_get functions (2015-07-06 10:39:24 +0200) >> gentle ping! > the (or at least my) plan was to get this into next early after the > merge window for 4.2 closes. Now we're already at -rc2. Can you please > comment? > > As of next-20150715 there don't seem to be any new users of gpiod > without flags btw. I'm all for taking this into -next ASAP then. Linus has control over the tree though, so his action is required. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Uwe Kleine-König > <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote: >> Hello Linus, hello Alexandre, >> >> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 12:51:38PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:07:59AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >>> > now that all patches that were in next hit Linus Torvalds' tree and >>> > v4.2-rc1 is out here comes the promised pull request that makes usage of >>> > the flags parameter mandatory for gpiod_get et al: >>> > >>> > The following changes since commit d770e558e21961ad6cfdf0ff7df0eb5d7d4f0754: >>> > >>> > Linux 4.2-rc1 (2015-07-05 11:01:52 -0700) >>> > >>> > are available in the git repository at: >>> > >>> > git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux.git tags/gpiod-flags-for-4.3 >>> > >>> > for you to fetch changes up to b17d1bf16cc72a374a48d748940f700009d40ff4: >>> > >>> > gpio: make flags mandatory for gpiod_get functions (2015-07-06 10:39:24 +0200) >>> gentle ping! >> the (or at least my) plan was to get this into next early after the >> merge window for 4.2 closes. Now we're already at -rc2. Can you please >> comment? >> >> As of next-20150715 there don't seem to be any new users of gpiod >> without flags btw. > > I'm all for taking this into -next ASAP then. Linus has control over > the tree though, so his action is required. I am pushing it today. I finally found this message in my messy inbox. I'm a bit up over my ears in patches... Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Linus, On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:28:25PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm all for taking this into -next ASAP then. Linus has control over > > the tree though, so his action is required. > > I am pushing it today. > > I finally found this message in my messy inbox. I'm a bit up over my > ears in patches... This somehow failed. My tag is merged in your devel branch, but this contains several commits missing in your for-next. Is this intended? Best regards Uwe
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote: > Hello Linus, > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:28:25PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I'm all for taking this into -next ASAP then. Linus has control over >> > the tree though, so his action is required. >> >> I am pushing it today. >> >> I finally found this message in my messy inbox. I'm a bit up over my >> ears in patches... > This somehow failed. My tag is merged in your devel branch, but this > contains several commits missing in your for-next. Is this intended? No ... :( I just pulled it in. If anything is to blame, I hope it's not me, I just issued git pull. commit 2563606ce45314bfeae811edfa9984b1921fff06 Merge: 015403145a65 b17d1bf16cc7 Author: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Date: Fri Jul 17 13:44:15 2015 +0200 Merge tag 'gpiod-flags-for-4.3' of git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux into devel The last patch in this series makes the flags parameter for the various gpiod_get* functions mandatory and so allows to remove an ugly cpp hack introduced in commit 39b2bbe3d715 (gpio: add flags argument to gpiod_get*() functions) for v3.17-rc1. The other nine commits fix the last remaining users of these functions that don't pass flags yet. (Only etraxfs-uart wasn't fixed; this driver's use of the gpiod functions needs fixing anyhow.) Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Linus, On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:41:09AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Uwe Kleine-König > <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote: > > Hello Linus, > > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:28:25PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > I'm all for taking this into -next ASAP then. Linus has control over > >> > the tree though, so his action is required. > >> > >> I am pushing it today. > >> > >> I finally found this message in my messy inbox. I'm a bit up over my > >> ears in patches... > > This somehow failed. My tag is merged in your devel branch, but this > > contains several commits missing in your for-next. Is this intended? > > No ... :( > > I just pulled it in. If anything is to blame, I hope it's not me, I just > issued git pull. > > commit 2563606ce45314bfeae811edfa9984b1921fff06 > Merge: 015403145a65 b17d1bf16cc7 > Author: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > Date: Fri Jul 17 13:44:15 2015 +0200 > > Merge tag 'gpiod-flags-for-4.3' of > git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux into devel > > The last patch in this series makes the flags parameter for the various > gpiod_get* functions mandatory and so allows to remove an ugly cpp hack > introduced in commit 39b2bbe3d715 (gpio: add flags argument to gpiod_get*() > functions) for v3.17-rc1. > > The other nine commits fix the last remaining users of these functions that > don't pass flags yet. (Only etraxfs-uart wasn't fixed; this > driver's use of the > gpiod functions needs fixing anyhow.) this is fine. It contains my signed data (you have to do git cat-file commit 2563606ce45314bfeae811edfa9984b1921fff06 to see that) and the usual ö-Problem doesn't exist here, because it was me who created the commits. Best regards Uwe
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote: >> I finally found this message in my messy inbox. I'm a bit up over my >> ears in patches... > > This somehow failed. My tag is merged in your devel branch, but this > contains several commits missing in your for-next. Is this intended? Ah wait I see. I pushed it to devel for testing, but the 0day build was not completing so I did not get green light to push it to next. I'll push to linux-next now. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html