[{"id":1445137,"web_url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/comment/1445137/","msgid":"<CA+55aFx+bk4p80UYzXw+a7avwJ37eVz6PXMhK9PPt5hdnGxxVQ@mail.gmail.com>","date":"2016-09-02T20:50:34","subject":"Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] (group) maintainership models","submitter":{"id":97,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/people/97/","name":"Linus Torvalds","email":"torvalds@linux-foundation.org"},"content":"On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> wrote:\n>\n> Like this?\n\nSure.\n\n> Is it always correct to replace return NO_IRQ by return 0?\n\nOn platforms that define it to 0, like powerpc, yes.\n\nOn arm, c6x, mn10300, parisc and sparc it would need more work.\n\n> Completely untested patch below.\n\nLooks fine, but the ppc people should test it (although it really\nshould generate the exact same code, unless there was some odd\nconversion case).\n\n                 Linus","headers":{"Return-Path":"<linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org>","X-Original-To":["patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org","linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org"],"Delivered-To":["patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org","linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org"],"Received":["from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [103.22.144.68])\n\t(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\n\t(No client certificate requested)\n\tby ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3sQrs63VtWz9s3T\n\tfor <patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org>;\n\tSat,  3 Sep 2016 06:51:54 +1000 (AEST)","from ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])\n\tby lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3sQrs62F5NzDsWh\n\tfor <patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org>;\n\tSat,  3 Sep 2016 06:51:54 +1000 (AEST)","from mail-oi0-x241.google.com (mail-oi0-x241.google.com\n\t[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::241])\n\t(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128\n\tbits)) (No client certificate requested)\n\tby lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3sQrqd12QNzDrpK\n\tfor <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>;\n\tSat,  3 Sep 2016 06:50:37 +1000 (AEST)","by mail-oi0-x241.google.com with SMTP id e126so2504572oig.0\n\tfor <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>;\n\tFri, 02 Sep 2016 13:50:37 -0700 (PDT)","by 10.182.190.69 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:50:34 -0700 (PDT)"],"Authentication-Results":["ozlabs.org;\n\tdkim=fail reason=\"signature verification failed\" (2048-bit key;\n\tunprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=isPT3O0N;\n\tdkim-atps=neutral","lists.ozlabs.org;\n\tdkim=fail reason=\"signature verification failed\" (2048-bit key;\n\tunprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=isPT3O0N;\n\tdkim-atps=neutral","lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key;\n\tunprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=isPT3O0N;\n\tdkim-atps=neutral"],"DKIM-Signature":"v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\n\th=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id\n\t:subject:to:cc;\n\tbh=j/22aF+u17kRisC6P5ssoa+gMCVnR6ixopiJtoUmy4Q=;\n\tb=isPT3O0NN/s0QB3TA++ElPkmnkHqeNymZliYjEXn6aKjkZrOJt7q1chLMm8Adty/TD\n\tdY790oyFJ+ZH5gd3mVqyrOFZxCnP1QKWiY5Cokt97/f/Q2wxfHrahGv3OxO4zURArMIE\n\tXKVuXN4z2r09r6pfzBKgV8YMa4GhxIp0adddBbWVJSrp6R1IZMVKk3cyUVIXC45OCKOn\n\tc4K0+GO9xvQWpxxELAPYtuj35BMjs5lQIYYp4tNN5qqzL+VeXkDdt70a+DadIXeJEqkW\n\tX94XNpMagDhMDdroJp785QtTAfGXs+xtnFRMHo0NYt03HVxFtXGKnNglnr/ykqkgggbL\n\tKmKQ==","X-Google-DKIM-Signature":"v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\n\td=1e100.net; s=20130820;\n\th=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from\n\t:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;\n\tbh=j/22aF+u17kRisC6P5ssoa+gMCVnR6ixopiJtoUmy4Q=;\n\tb=itMcdChycqCYDum3YHki0hegHpmTWao93vWidJjpGUz7njELVau7vtgrhDZoS2gzxQ\n\t1jYqQO0hn6UD+R9/crM1kBp2vRujDAQtVSppTPr1evGvzbMtt+P5vPhiJnWoqSJmZbnA\n\tItLO8Sfyx1SRr1X7AKxZ1XuyqP82Y9YDVjmNkScF5i+xAWlgf5XJoemKuknS+CouBBDk\n\tMm9iiF8emf4rsHrNv+/AJFUhOvcBtquQ/ux1K4cCEDJ5pLpeR6YEYtzkSZJiDUZ7A8O5\n\ts5YwfykRoCQ1MbtnaO66Y+IB7VX495xDO5jW5ABC4tN6W/IEXFo3/nzEfMLjzIvn9AsR\n\tmaZg==","X-Gm-Message-State":"AE9vXwNpjuHLvD7odIZe/B5Yf0RF+vlok2U+iN6c1oJygpI/RwlSurg2cXXCqUoc0elLeBsEyC+Pwchl0wdC6Q==","X-Received":"by 10.157.63.180 with SMTP id r49mr21060959otc.140.1472849435274;\n\tFri, 02 Sep 2016 13:50:35 -0700 (PDT)","MIME-Version":"1.0","In-Reply-To":"<alpine.DEB.2.10.1609022241560.3378@hadrien>","References":"<CAKMK7uEuqLLf2bCyB-sAuu5WvVA1Kp7Jvc33k3um5DfdQr4eyg@mail.gmail.com>\n\t<20160902104619.GD9355@localhost>\n\t<CA+55aFwSpNrOuOzaR5hh0A1XvuTu0=xVbE_CV1RVf9GMrTPDNQ@mail.gmail.com>\n\t<7359509.5sppVSLXcK@wuerfel>\n\t<CA+55aFzw-KkQOhVJG+c-WEFA=6o5aXy=yU9KXQ7jwy-xy--d9Q@mail.gmail.com>\n\t<alpine.DEB.2.10.1609022241560.3378@hadrien>","From":"Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>","Date":"Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:50:34 -0700","X-Google-Sender-Auth":"qXMTfUFV9VkIVbryPXdO_ZC_8e0","Message-ID":"<CA+55aFx+bk4p80UYzXw+a7avwJ37eVz6PXMhK9PPt5hdnGxxVQ@mail.gmail.com>","Subject":"Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] (group) maintainership models","To":"Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>","Content-Type":"text/plain; charset=UTF-8","X-BeenThere":"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org","X-Mailman-Version":"2.1.22","Precedence":"list","List-Id":"Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List\n\t<linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>","List-Unsubscribe":"<https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,\n\t<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>","List-Archive":"<http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>","List-Post":"<mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>","List-Help":"<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>","List-Subscribe":"<https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,\n\t<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>","Cc":"Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,\n\tDave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, \"Nikula,\n\tJani\" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>, \n\tGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,\n\tppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>","Errors-To":"linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org","Sender":"\"Linuxppc-dev\"\n\t<linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org>"}}]