[{"id":3679038,"web_url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/comment/3679038/","msgid":"<6F8EF58E-EE6F-432B-B3B4-674166122E83@comcast.net>","list_archive_url":null,"date":"2026-04-18T23:19:03","subject":"Re: [PATCH] Revert gcc.dg/torture/pr113026-1.c XFAILs/XPASSes\n [PR113524]","submitter":{"id":4385,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/people/4385/","name":"Mike Stump","email":"mikestump@comcast.net"},"content":"On Apr 18, 2026, at 12:10 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:\n> \n> On Apr 17, 2026, Christophe Lyon wrote:\n> \n>> On 4/17/26 06:30, Alexandre Oliva wrote:\n>>> On Apr 16, 2026, Christophe Lyon wrote:\n>>> \n>>>> On 4/16/26 06:41, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-regression wrote:\n>>>>> The test fails on arm-eabi when testing with the following settings:\n>>>>> -mlittle-endian -mfloat-abi=hard -mcpu=cortex-a9 -mfpu=vfpv3\n>>>>> \n>>>>> It only fails in the following torture option set:\n>>>>> -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions\n>>> \n>>>> Isn't that combination excluded by\n>>>> /* { dg-skip-if \"\" { *-*-* } { \"-ftracer\" } { \"\" } } */\n>>>> at the beginning of the testcase?\n>>> \n>>> Aah. Yeah, I suppose in gcc-16 it does. I was looking at gcc-15\n>>> sources and results, without realizing there was a different fix in\n>>> gcc-16 for the problem I observed in gcc-15.\n>>> \n>>> I guess I should revert my change and take that one and see how it goes\n>>> in our gcc-15 builds. I'm fine with reverting my seemingly redundant\n>>> change in gcc-16; should I?\n> \n>> I think so, but since IIUC you checked on gcc-15, please check on trunk\n>> too before committing the revert.\n>> But maybe we want a partial backport of r16-5911-g7dd39924c9a696 to gcc-15?\n> \n> commit 14cd2833b27a9700aa8679fd0a090e8ae7a5f44a added xfails, but\n> 2025-12-05's Richard Biener 's PR\n> tree-optimization/120939 patch to skip gcc.dg/torture/pr113026-1.c\n> when -ftracer had already taken care of them without XPASSes.\n> \n> Tested with trunk on arm-eabi and riscv32-elf. Ok to install?\n\nOk.\n\nReverts generally don't need approval.","headers":{"Return-Path":"","X-Original-To":["incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org","gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"],"Delivered-To":["patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org","gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"],"Authentication-Results":["legolas.ozlabs.org;\n\tdkim=pass (2048-bit key;\n unprotected) header.d=comcast.net header.i=@comcast.net header.a=rsa-sha256\n header.s=20190202a header.b=1RmBWjAI;\n\tdkim-atps=neutral","legolas.ozlabs.org;\n spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org\n (client-ip=2620:52:6:3111::32; helo=vm01.sourceware.org;\n envelope-from=gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org;\n receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org)","sourceware.org;\n\tdkim=pass (2048-bit key,\n unprotected) header.d=comcast.net header.i=@comcast.net header.a=rsa-sha256\n header.s=20190202a header.b=1RmBWjAI","sourceware.org;\n dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=comcast.net","sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=comcast.net","server2.sourceware.org;\n arc=none smtp.remote-ip=96.102.19.42"],"Received":["from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org\n [IPv6:2620:52:6:3111::32])\n\t(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)\n\t key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384)\n\t(No client certificate requested)\n\tby legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4fynlg11cJz1yGt\n\tfor ; Sun, 19 Apr 2026 09:19:37 +1000 (AEST)","from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])\n\tby sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45324BA903F\n\tfor ; Sat, 18 Apr 2026 23:19:35 +0000 (GMT)","from resqmta-c2p-569299.sys.comcast.net\n (resqmta-c2p-569299.sys.comcast.net [96.102.19.42])\n by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 757954BA9009\n for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2026 23:19:09 +0000 (GMT)","from resomta-c2p-555482.sys.comcast.net ([96.102.18.233])\n (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 256/256 bits)\n (Client did not present a certificate)\n by resqmta-c2p-569299.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPS\n id EEexwCuInWkOhEEwOw8kIo; Sat, 18 Apr 2026 23:19:08 +0000","from smtpclient.apple ([76.133.244.13])\n (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 256/256 bits)\n (Client did not present a certificate)\n by resomta-c2p-555482.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA\n id EEwJwcwxxevdUEEwLwHAFj; Sat, 18 Apr 2026 23:19:08 +0000"],"DKIM-Filter":["OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B45324BA903F","OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 757954BA9009"],"DMARC-Filter":"OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 757954BA9009","ARC-Filter":"OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 757954BA9009","ARC-Seal":"i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1776554349; cv=none;\n b=XP0CTYBAZK7eDC0NlCcfDwyjH3e8El7XktmvK+1xTQ3vTEtxqmSVn/OBBrc553MeKuf3nYQCaAyxAHVN+60w5k/iLJ+/ZHPRTwo8wCvhZmfMUB3DR9NbLIgrJdQm6bTFBXRNItGuaUoIQRNkjlLwiyY9ts4bBV6M3j84F9E2gKQ=","ARC-Message-Signature":"i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;\n t=1776554349; c=relaxed/simple;\n bh=46xuiEsin4f6EWNUBF7tJFNq4L41gGKRYRbOv+DJtd4=;\n h=DKIM-Signature:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To;\n b=JxWqM1j6ZQVR1P+Dlu97W1Hi6H/+Ferl/ZvQlclkwezIuwuuYk+xid3bD6RyjedM26cmFtU9wpIQ37oI7oNjz08wSnqEhPE+Cw6LvzSbnEvWPwRp5XmbIhhn0wzm4y+0Br7s55P9V3ScSOU/Se6RM4vCpBK2sYJNx962kZBbPY8=","ARC-Authentication-Results":"i=1; server2.sourceware.org","DKIM-Signature":"v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net;\n s=20190202a; t=1776554348;\n bh=Srz2vLr2WUzOtOC3UjX3hcnZ4XmU+W1fKNcdzmLwjJg=;\n h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date:\n Message-Id:To:Xfinity-Spam-Result;\n b=1RmBWjAItIGHyexMqy3O1uWcjy6mBZG8jAge3r0T3rg3B2zwD5E85filjaA8/rh6I\n iXVkJRXbBhltY4HC4iIbLzNu7l0VEIh1MCstMvWVchAyaNzS6h1khvMtuacJ/6dpQa\n JAw6qaWuDehetM0jgF7jP+M2Lqr7q+eYhAsFfvziJB1HSP7Vj8MwTjWfny6q8UBApG\n 2VwbqknxaZhZv247jDCvx/pz/l1ooFSpiE6lWUCmxLAorwCzPo1jcR1i0zgAhlOwH/\n GEz6qSO9cxqfSr7bVtLPLPwOLadzrZ9A1JleYbDGEW/pl6n88C9mFTnGDD9cHHacL2\n bCE8uZLc0GpNA==","Xfinity-QID":"EEwJwcwxxevdUEEwOwHAFo","Content-Type":"text/plain;\n\tcharset=us-ascii","Mime-Version":"1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \\(3696.120.41.1.10\\))","Subject":"Re: [PATCH] Revert gcc.dg/torture/pr113026-1.c XFAILs/XPASSes\n [PR113524]","From":"Mike Stump ","In-Reply-To":"","Date":"Sat, 18 Apr 2026 16:19:03 -0700","Cc":"Christophe Lyon , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,\n Rainer Orth ","Content-Transfer-Encoding":"quoted-printable","Message-Id":"<6F8EF58E-EE6F-432B-B3B4-674166122E83@comcast.net>","References":"<864332704.2301.1775906005441@72d3563a6d18>\n \n <06abd38d-0750-4f26-8c5e-c6cc88f0f2de@arm.com>\n \n <1f964896-85c4-4d07-8eb1-bec8b1123c3f@arm.com>\n ","To":"Alexandre Oliva ","X-Mailer":"Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.10)","X-CMAE-Envelope":"\n MS4xfA05oxwhjb/9aosXh3NaOfX9bcl1NauUFK6wP8oSgApukDPrrRAVmL/PjRKr+vAVcH9EBJgDhTWYvfyX/oEpvSbAkuwATf4hczbJkzXQx6I28AAhbfC8\n DIQOp11V+KKzvWbimpPiducC3q+gnDXkVSjvnbvg9efSXiGRxKdPuZVoddx4F2dTbKmCWAEEPrpGO7ro+4VqMmUXkons5JvHY4kVLY6OF9HgY8lEDQuRiXQA\n F5HlbX6zoqAecaQDzhxpK8PJxq8JONQeaM9myvibSoRO65Fs1MPqoFM1YQap1bJ9lFofRWMI5DhKm0sSZIes0A==","X-BeenThere":"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org","X-Mailman-Version":"2.1.30","Precedence":"list","List-Id":"Gcc-patches mailing list ","List-Unsubscribe":",\n ","List-Archive":"","List-Post":"","List-Help":"","List-Subscribe":",\n ","Errors-To":"gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org"}}]