[{"id":1768181,"web_url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/comment/1768181/","msgid":"<013cde59-86fe-e796-5d80-5bb6843fed65@redhat.com>","list_archive_url":null,"date":"2017-09-13T21:05:16","subject":"Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/23] make bdrv_get_block_status\n\tbyte-based","submitter":{"id":6591,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/people/6591/","name":"Eric Blake","email":"eblake@redhat.com"},"content":"On 09/13/2017 11:03 AM, Eric Blake wrote:\n> There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS,\n> but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the\n> reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even\n> much higher levels).  I've therefore started the task of\n> converting our block status code to report at a byte granularity\n> rather than sectors.\n> \n> Now that 2.11 is open, I'm rebasing/reposting the remaining patches.\n> \n> The overall conversion currently looks like:\n> part 1: bdrv_is_allocated (merged, commit 51b0a488)\n> part 2: dirty-bitmap (v7 is posted [1], mostly reviewed)\n> part 3: bdrv_get_block_status (this series, v3 at [2])\n> part 4: .bdrv_co_block_status (v2 is posted [3], but needs a rebase)\n> \n> Available as a tag at:\n> git fetch git://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git nbd-byte-status-v4\n> \n> Based-on: <20170912203119.24166-1-eblake@redhat.com>\n> ([PATCH v7 00/20] make dirty-bitmap byte-based)\n\nAlso,\n\nBased-on: <20170913210343.19078-1-eblake@redhat.com>\n(osdep: Fix ROUND_UP(64-bit, 32-bit))","headers":{"Return-Path":"<qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org>","X-Original-To":"incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org","Delivered-To":"patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org","Authentication-Results":["ozlabs.org;\n\tspf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org\n\t(client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; helo=lists.gnu.org;\n\tenvelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org;\n\treceiver=<UNKNOWN>)","ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com;\n\tdmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com","ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com;\n\tspf=fail smtp.mailfrom=eblake@redhat.com"],"Received":["from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::11])\n\t(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\n\t(No client certificate requested)\n\tby ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3xsvMm3sJzz9s7M\n\tfor <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>;\n\tThu, 14 Sep 2017 07:05:56 +1000 (AEST)","from localhost ([::1]:44669 helo=lists.gnu.org)\n\tby lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from\n\t<qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org>)\n\tid 1dsEr4-0007eH-Le\n\tfor incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:05:54 -0400","from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60654)\n\tby lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\n\t(envelope-from <eblake@redhat.com>) id 1dsEqf-0007cQ-Dc\n\tfor qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:05:30 -0400","from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)\n\t(envelope-from <eblake@redhat.com>) id 1dsEqe-0007B5-B2\n\tfor qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:05:29 -0400","from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57776)\n\tby eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)\n\t(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eblake@redhat.com>)\n\tid 1dsEqY-000776-Fz; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:05:22 -0400","from smtp.corp.redhat.com\n\t(int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13])\n\t(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\n\t(No client certificate requested)\n\tby mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88D1680F94;\n\tWed, 13 Sep 2017 21:05:21 +0000 (UTC)","from [10.10.120.201] (ovpn-120-201.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.201])\n\tby smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D2D60600;\n\tWed, 13 Sep 2017 21:05:16 +0000 (UTC)"],"DMARC-Filter":"OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 88D1680F94","To":"qemu-devel@nongnu.org","References":"<20170913160333.23622-1-eblake@redhat.com>","From":"Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>","Openpgp":"url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg","Organization":"Red Hat, Inc.","Message-ID":"<013cde59-86fe-e796-5d80-5bb6843fed65@redhat.com>","Date":"Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:05:16 -0500","User-Agent":"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101\n\tThunderbird/52.3.0","MIME-Version":"1.0","In-Reply-To":"<20170913160333.23622-1-eblake@redhat.com>","Content-Type":"multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;\n\tprotocol=\"application/pgp-signature\";\n\tboundary=\"2mU4phmR43N4440qeUIHlnTIuGDbFOdrm\"","X-Scanned-By":"MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13","X-Greylist":"Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16\n\t(mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]);\n\tWed, 13 Sep 2017 21:05:21 +0000 (UTC)","X-detected-operating-system":"by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]\n\t[fuzzy]","X-Received-From":"209.132.183.28","X-Content-Filtered-By":"Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21","Subject":"Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/23] make bdrv_get_block_status\n\tbyte-based","X-BeenThere":"qemu-devel@nongnu.org","X-Mailman-Version":"2.1.21","Precedence":"list","List-Id":"<qemu-devel.nongnu.org>","List-Unsubscribe":"<https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,\n\t<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>","List-Archive":"<http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>","List-Post":"<mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>","List-Help":"<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>","List-Subscribe":"<https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,\n\t<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>","Cc":"kwolf@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com,\n\tqemu-block@nongnu.org","Errors-To":"qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org","Sender":"\"Qemu-devel\"\n\t<qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org>"}}]